Better to use ++i than i++ (minor optimization)

[kdenlive] / src / clipproperties.cpp

diff --git a/src/clipproperties.cpp b/src/clipproperties.cpp
index d2c764703c7cb379fc02380e40dc7035b7ab4b90..589f58945347433066885574bd563dc12866ec0a 100644 (file)
--- a/src/clipproperties.cpp
+++ b/src/clipproperties.cpp
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ ClipProperties::ClipProperties(DocClipBase *clip, const Timecode &tc, double fps
             m_view.animation->setCurrentIndex(0);
         QString path = props.value("resource");
         QString ext = path.section('.', -1);
-        for (int i = 0; i < m_view.image_type->count(); i++) {
+        for (int i = 0; i < m_view.image_type->count(); ++i) {
             if (m_view.image_type->itemData(i).toString() == ext) {
                 m_view.image_type->setCurrentIndex(i);
                 break;
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ void ClipProperties::slotDeleteMarker()
 {
     QList < CommentedTime > marks = m_clip->commentedSnapMarkers();
     QList < CommentedTime > toDelete;
-    for (int i = 0; i < marks.count(); i++) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < marks.count(); ++i) {
        if (m_view.markers_list->topLevelItem(i)->isSelected()) {
            CommentedTime marker = marks.at(i);
            marker.setMarkerType(-1);