X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fmovepick.cpp;h=a69a4c1b5bb899741acac76440d4f6cae8596a91;hb=1d977aa79ecaf410f4b2065eb8f11e0a5e689db4;hp=1a00367b334314ab80fee3d7abf46913058fcdfd;hpb=a03ab94f4446f4b27fa7c1a764af4c5a22a42352;p=stockfish
diff --git a/src/movepick.cpp b/src/movepick.cpp
index 1a00367b..a69a4c1b 100644
--- a/src/movepick.cpp
+++ b/src/movepick.cpp
@@ -1,502 +1,351 @@
/*
- Glaurung, a UCI chess playing engine.
- Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tord Romstad
+ Stockfish, a UCI chess playing engine derived from Glaurung 2.1
+ Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tord Romstad (Glaurung author)
+ Copyright (C) 2008-2015 Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski, Tord Romstad
- Glaurung is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ Stockfish is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
-
- Glaurung is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+
+
+ Stockfish is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
-
+
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see .
*/
-
-////
-//// Includes
-////
-
#include
-#include "history.h"
-#include "movegen.h"
#include "movepick.h"
-#include "search.h"
-#include "value.h"
+#include "thread.h"
+namespace {
-////
-//// Local definitions
-////
+ enum Stages {
+ MAIN_SEARCH, GOOD_CAPTURES, KILLERS, GOOD_QUIETS, BAD_QUIETS, BAD_CAPTURES,
+ EVASION, ALL_EVASIONS,
+ QSEARCH_WITH_CHECKS, QCAPTURES_1, CHECKS,
+ QSEARCH_WITHOUT_CHECKS, QCAPTURES_2,
+ PROBCUT, PROBCUT_CAPTURES,
+ RECAPTURE, RECAPTURES,
+ STOP
+ };
+
+ // Our insertion sort, which is guaranteed to be stable, as it should be
+ void insertion_sort(ExtMove* begin, ExtMove* end)
+ {
+ ExtMove tmp, *p, *q;
+
+ for (p = begin + 1; p < end; ++p)
+ {
+ tmp = *p;
+ for (q = p; q != begin && *(q-1) < tmp; --q)
+ *q = *(q-1);
+ *q = tmp;
+ }
+ }
-namespace {
+ // pick_best() finds the best move in the range (begin, end) and moves it to
+ // the front. It's faster than sorting all the moves in advance when there
+ // are few moves e.g. the possible captures.
+ Move pick_best(ExtMove* begin, ExtMove* end)
+ {
+ std::swap(*begin, *std::max_element(begin, end));
+ return *begin;
+ }
- /// Variables
+} // namespace
- MovePicker::MovegenPhase PhaseTable[32];
- int MainSearchPhaseIndex;
- int EvasionsPhaseIndex;
- int QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex;
- int QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex;
-}
+/// Constructors of the MovePicker class. As arguments we pass information
+/// to help it to return the (presumably) good moves first, to decide which
+/// moves to return (in the quiescence search, for instance, we only want to
+/// search captures, promotions and some checks) and how important good move
+/// ordering is at the current node.
+MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, Depth d, const HistoryStats& h, const CounterMovesHistoryStats& cmh,
+ Move cm, Search::Stack* s) : pos(p), history(h), counterMovesHistory(cmh), depth(d) {
+ assert(d > DEPTH_ZERO);
-////
-//// Functions
-////
+ endBadCaptures = moves + MAX_MOVES - 1;
+ countermove = cm;
+ ss = s;
+ if (pos.checkers())
+ stage = EVASION;
-/// Constructor for the MovePicker class. Apart from the position for which
-/// it is asked to pick legal moves, MovePicker also wants some information
-/// to help it to return the presumably good moves first, to decide which
-/// moves to return (in the quiescence search, for instance, we only want to
-/// search captures, promotions and some checks) and about how important good
-/// move ordering is at the current node.
-
-MovePicker::MovePicker(Position &p, bool pvnode, Move ttm, Move mk,
- Move k1, Move k2, Depth dpth) {
- pos = &p;
- pvNode = pvnode;
- ttMove = ttm;
- mateKiller = (mk == ttm)? MOVE_NONE : mk;
- killer1 = k1;
- killer2 = k2;
- depth = dpth;
- movesPicked = 0;
- numOfMoves = 0;
- numOfBadCaptures = 0;
- dc = p.discovered_check_candidates(p.side_to_move());
-
- if(p.is_check())
- phaseIndex = EvasionsPhaseIndex;
- else if(depth > Depth(0))
- phaseIndex = MainSearchPhaseIndex;
- else if(depth == Depth(0))
- phaseIndex = QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex;
else
- phaseIndex = QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex;
-
- pinned = p.pinned_pieces(p.side_to_move());
+ stage = MAIN_SEARCH;
- finished = false;
+ ttMove = (ttm && pos.pseudo_legal(ttm) ? ttm : MOVE_NONE);
+ endMoves += (ttMove != MOVE_NONE);
}
+MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, Depth d, const HistoryStats& h, const CounterMovesHistoryStats& cmh,
+ Square s) : pos(p), history(h), counterMovesHistory(cmh) {
-/// MovePicker::get_next_move() is the most important method of the MovePicker
-/// class. It returns a new legal move every time it is called, until there
-/// are no more moves left of the types we are interested in.
+ assert(d <= DEPTH_ZERO);
-Move MovePicker::get_next_move() {
- Move move;
+ if (pos.checkers())
+ stage = EVASION;
- while(true) {
- // If we already have a list of generated moves, pick the best move from
- // the list, and return it:
- move = this->pick_move_from_list();
- if(move != MOVE_NONE) {
- assert(move_is_ok(move));
- return move;
- }
+ else if (d > DEPTH_QS_NO_CHECKS)
+ stage = QSEARCH_WITH_CHECKS;
- // Next phase:
- phaseIndex++;
- switch(PhaseTable[phaseIndex]) {
-
- case PH_TT_MOVE:
- if(ttMove != MOVE_NONE) {
- assert(move_is_ok(ttMove));
- Move m = generate_move_if_legal(*pos, ttMove, pinned);
- if(m != MOVE_NONE) {
- assert(m == ttMove);
- return m;
- }
- }
- break;
+ else if (d > DEPTH_QS_RECAPTURES)
+ stage = QSEARCH_WITHOUT_CHECKS;
- case PH_MATE_KILLER:
- if(mateKiller != MOVE_NONE) {
- assert(move_is_ok(mateKiller));
- Move m = generate_move_if_legal(*pos, mateKiller, pinned);
- if(m != MOVE_NONE) {
- assert(m == mateKiller);
- return m;
- }
- }
- break;
-
- case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES:
- // pinned = pos->pinned_pieces(pos->side_to_move());
- numOfMoves = generate_captures(*pos, moves);
- this->score_captures();
- movesPicked = 0;
- break;
+ else
+ {
+ stage = RECAPTURE;
+ recaptureSquare = s;
+ ttm = MOVE_NONE;
+ }
- case PH_BAD_CAPTURES:
- badCapturesPicked = 0;
- break;
+ ttMove = (ttm && pos.pseudo_legal(ttm) ? ttm : MOVE_NONE);
+ endMoves += (ttMove != MOVE_NONE);
+}
- case PH_NONCAPTURES:
- numOfMoves = generate_noncaptures(*pos, moves);
- this->score_noncaptures();
- movesPicked = 0;
- break;
+MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, const HistoryStats& h, const CounterMovesHistoryStats& cmh, PieceType pt)
+ : pos(p), history(h), counterMovesHistory(cmh) {
- case PH_EVASIONS:
- assert(pos->is_check());
- // pinned = pos->pinned_pieces(pos->side_to_move());
- numOfMoves = generate_evasions(*pos, moves);
- this->score_evasions();
- movesPicked = 0;
- break;
+ assert(!pos.checkers());
- case PH_QCAPTURES:
- // pinned = pos->pinned_pieces(pos->side_to_move());
- numOfMoves = generate_captures(*pos, moves);
- this->score_qcaptures();
- movesPicked = 0;
- break;
+ stage = PROBCUT;
- case PH_QCHECKS:
- numOfMoves = generate_checks(*pos, moves, dc);
- movesPicked = 0;
- break;
+ // In ProbCut we generate only captures that are better than the parent's
+ // captured piece.
+ captureThreshold = PieceValue[MG][pt];
+ ttMove = (ttm && pos.pseudo_legal(ttm) ? ttm : MOVE_NONE);
- case PH_STOP:
- return MOVE_NONE;
+ if (ttMove && (!pos.capture(ttMove) || pos.see(ttMove) <= captureThreshold))
+ ttMove = MOVE_NONE;
- default:
- assert(false);
- return MOVE_NONE;
- }
- }
+ endMoves += (ttMove != MOVE_NONE);
+}
- assert(false);
- return MOVE_NONE;
+/// score() assign a numerical value to each move in a move list. The moves with
+/// highest values will be picked first.
+template<>
+void MovePicker::score() {
+ // Winning and equal captures in the main search are ordered by MVV.
+ // Suprisingly, this appears to perform slightly better than SEE based
+ // move ordering. The reason is probably that in a position with a winning
+ // capture, capturing a valuable (but sufficiently defended) piece
+ // first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and
+ // the hanging piece will still be hanging (except in the unusual cases
+ // where it is possible to recapture with the hanging piece). Exchanging
+ // big pieces before capturing a hanging piece probably helps to reduce
+ // the subtree size.
+ // In main search we want to push captures with negative SEE values to the
+ // badCaptures[] array, but instead of doing it now we delay until the move
+ // has been picked up in pick_move_from_list(). This way we save some SEE
+ // calls in case we get a cutoff.
+ for (auto& m : *this)
+ m.value = PieceValue[MG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(m))]
+ - Value(200 * relative_rank(pos.side_to_move(), to_sq(m)));
}
+template<>
+void MovePicker::score() {
-/// A variant of get_next_move() which takes a lock as a parameter, used to
-/// prevent multiple threads from picking the same move at a split point.
-
-Move MovePicker::get_next_move(Lock &lock) {
- Move m;
+ Square prevSq = to_sq((ss-1)->currentMove);
+ const HistoryStats& cmh = counterMovesHistory[pos.piece_on(prevSq)][prevSq];
- lock_grab(&lock);
- if(finished) {
- lock_release(&lock);
- return MOVE_NONE;
- }
- m = this->get_next_move();
- if(m == MOVE_NONE)
- finished = true;
- lock_release(&lock);
-
- return m;
+ for (auto& m : *this)
+ m.value = history[pos.moved_piece(m)][to_sq(m)]
+ + cmh[pos.moved_piece(m)][to_sq(m)] * 3;
}
-
-/// MovePicker::number_of_moves() simply returns the numOfMoves member
-/// variable. It is intended to be used in positions where the side to move
-/// is in check, for detecting checkmates or situations where there is only
-/// a single reply to check.
+template<>
+void MovePicker::score() {
+ // Try good captures ordered by MVV/LVA, then non-captures if destination square
+ // is not under attack, ordered by history value, then bad-captures and quiet
+ // moves with a negative SEE. This last group is ordered by the SEE value.
+ Value see;
-int MovePicker::number_of_moves() const {
- return numOfMoves;
+ for (auto& m : *this)
+ if ((see = pos.see_sign(m)) < VALUE_ZERO)
+ m.value = see - HistoryStats::Max; // At the bottom
+
+ else if (pos.capture(m))
+ m.value = PieceValue[MG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(m))]
+ - Value(type_of(pos.moved_piece(m))) + HistoryStats::Max;
+ else
+ m.value = history[pos.moved_piece(m)][to_sq(m)];
}
-/// MovePicker::score_captures(), MovePicker::score_noncaptures(),
-/// MovePicker::score_evasions() and MovePicker::score_qcaptures() assign a
-/// numerical move ordering score to each move in a move list. The moves
-/// with highest scores will be picked first by
-/// MovePicker::pick_move_from_list().
+/// generate_next_stage() generates, scores and sorts the next bunch of moves,
+/// when there are no more moves to try for the current stage.
-void MovePicker::score_captures() {
- // Winning and equal captures in the main search are ordered by MVV/LVA.
- // Suprisingly, this appears to perform slightly better than SEE based
- // move ordering. The reason is probably that in a position with a winning
- // capture, capturing a more valuable (but sufficiently defended) piece
- // first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and
- // the hanging piece will still be hanging (except in the unusual cases
- // where it is possible to recapture with the hanging piece). Exchanging
- // big pieces before capturing a hanging piece probably helps to reduce
- // the subtree size.
- for(int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) {
- int seeValue = pos->see(moves[i].move);
- if(seeValue >= 0) {
- if(move_promotion(moves[i].move))
- moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame;
- else
- moves[i].score =
- int(pos->midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(moves[i].move))) -
- int(pos->type_of_piece_on(move_from(moves[i].move)));
- }
- else
- moves[i].score = seeValue;
-
- }
-}
+void MovePicker::generate_next_stage() {
-void MovePicker::score_noncaptures() {
+ cur = moves;
- All_zero = true;
- for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++)
- {
- Move m = moves[i].move;
- if (m == killer1)
- {
- moves[i].score = HistoryMax + 2;
- All_zero = false;
- }
- else if (m == killer2)
- {
- moves[i].score = HistoryMax + 1;
- All_zero = false;
- }
- else
- {
- moves[i].score = H.move_ordering_score(pos->piece_on(move_from(m)), m);
- if (All_zero && moves[i].score != 0)
- All_zero = false;
- }
- }
- //if (!all_zero)
- // return;
-
- // If we don't have at least one history score then
- // try to order using psq tables difference between
- // from square and to square.
- //for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++)
- // moves[i].score = pos->mg_pst_delta(moves[i].move);
-}
+ switch (++stage) {
-void MovePicker::score_evasions() {
- for(int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) {
- Move m = moves[i].move;
- if(m == ttMove)
- moves[i].score = 2*HistoryMax;
- else if(!pos->square_is_empty(move_to(m))) {
- int seeScore = pos->see(m);
- moves[i].score = (seeScore >= 0)? seeScore + HistoryMax : seeScore;
- }
- else
- moves[i].score = H.move_ordering_score(pos->piece_on(move_from(m)), m);
- }
-}
+ case GOOD_CAPTURES: case QCAPTURES_1: case QCAPTURES_2:
+ case PROBCUT_CAPTURES: case RECAPTURES:
+ endMoves = generate(pos, moves);
+ score();
+ break;
+
+ case KILLERS:
+ cur = killers;
+ endMoves = cur + 2;
+
+ killers[0] = ss->killers[0];
+ killers[1] = ss->killers[1];
+ killers[2].move = MOVE_NONE;
-void MovePicker::score_qcaptures() {
- // Use MVV/LVA ordering.
- for(int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) {
- Move m = moves[i].move;
- if(move_promotion(m))
- moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame;
- else
- moves[i].score =
- int(pos->midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m))) -
- int(pos->midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m))) / 64;
+ // Be sure countermoves are different from killers
+ if ( countermove != killers[0]
+ && countermove != killers[1])
+ *endMoves++ = countermove;
+ break;
+
+ case GOOD_QUIETS:
+ endQuiets = endMoves = generate(pos, moves);
+ score();
+ endMoves = std::partition(cur, endMoves, [](const ExtMove& m) { return m.value > VALUE_ZERO; });
+ insertion_sort(cur, endMoves);
+ break;
+
+ case BAD_QUIETS:
+ cur = endMoves;
+ endMoves = endQuiets;
+ if (depth >= 3 * ONE_PLY)
+ insertion_sort(cur, endMoves);
+ break;
+
+ case BAD_CAPTURES:
+ // Just pick them in reverse order to get MVV/LVA ordering
+ cur = moves + MAX_MOVES - 1;
+ endMoves = endBadCaptures;
+ break;
+
+ case ALL_EVASIONS:
+ endMoves = generate(pos, moves);
+ if (endMoves - moves > 1)
+ score();
+ break;
+
+ case CHECKS:
+ endMoves = generate(pos, moves);
+ break;
+
+ case EVASION: case QSEARCH_WITH_CHECKS: case QSEARCH_WITHOUT_CHECKS:
+ case PROBCUT: case RECAPTURE:
+ stage = STOP;
+ /* Fall through */
+
+ case STOP:
+ endMoves = cur + 1; // Avoid another generate_next_stage() call
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ assert(false);
}
}
-/// MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() picks the move with the biggest score
-/// from a list of generated moves (moves[] or badCaptures[], depending on
-/// the current move generation phase). It takes care not to return the
-/// transposition table move if that has already been serched previously.
-/// While picking captures in the PH_GOOD_CAPTURES phase (i.e. while picking
-/// non-losing captures in the main search), it moves all captures with
-/// negative SEE values to the badCaptures[] array.
+/// next_move() is the most important method of the MovePicker class. It returns
+/// a new pseudo legal move every time it is called, until there are no more moves
+/// left. It picks the move with the biggest value from a list of generated moves
+/// taking care not to return the ttMove if it has already been searched.
+template<>
+Move MovePicker::next_move() {
-Move MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() {
- int bestScore = -10000000;
- int bestIndex;
Move move;
- switch(PhaseTable[phaseIndex]) {
-
- case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES:
- assert(!pos->is_check());
- assert(movesPicked >= 0);
- while(movesPicked < numOfMoves) {
- bestScore = -10000000;
- bestIndex = -1;
- for(int i = movesPicked; i < numOfMoves; i++) {
- if(moves[i].score < 0) {
- // Losing capture, move it to the badCaptures[] array
- assert(numOfBadCaptures < 63);
- badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures++] = moves[i];
- moves[i--] = moves[--numOfMoves];
- }
- else if(moves[i].score > bestScore) {
- bestIndex = i;
- bestScore = moves[i].score;
- }
- }
- if(bestIndex != -1) { // Found a good capture
- move = moves[bestIndex].move;
- moves[bestIndex] = moves[movesPicked++];
- if(move != ttMove && move != mateKiller &&
- pos->move_is_legal(move, pinned))
- return move;
- }
- }
- break;
-
- case PH_NONCAPTURES:
- assert(!pos->is_check());
- assert(movesPicked >= 0);
- while(movesPicked < numOfMoves) {
- bestScore = -10000000;
-
- // If this is a PV node or we have only picked a few moves, scan
- // the entire move list for the best move. If many moves have already
- // been searched and it is not a PV node, we are probably failing low
- // anyway, so we just pick the first move from the list.
- if(!All_zero && (pvNode || movesPicked < 12)) {
- bestIndex = -1;
- for(int i = movesPicked; i < numOfMoves; i++)
- if(moves[i].score > bestScore) {
- bestIndex = i;
- bestScore = moves[i].score;
- }
- }
- else
- bestIndex = movesPicked;
-
- if(bestIndex != -1) {
- move = moves[bestIndex].move;
- moves[bestIndex] = moves[movesPicked++];
- if(move != ttMove && move != mateKiller &&
- pos->move_is_legal(move, pinned))
- return move;
- }
- }
- break;
-
- case PH_EVASIONS:
- assert(pos->is_check());
- assert(movesPicked >= 0);
- while(movesPicked < numOfMoves) {
- bestScore = -10000000;
- bestIndex = -1;
- for(int i = movesPicked; i < numOfMoves; i++)
- if(moves[i].score > bestScore) {
- bestIndex = i;
- bestScore = moves[i].score;
- }
-
- if(bestIndex != -1) {
- move = moves[bestIndex].move;
- moves[bestIndex] = moves[movesPicked++];
- return move;
- }
- }
- break;
-
- case PH_BAD_CAPTURES:
- assert(!pos->is_check());
- assert(badCapturesPicked >= 0);
- // It's probably a good idea to use SEE move ordering here, instead
- // of just picking the first move. FIXME
- while(badCapturesPicked < numOfBadCaptures) {
- move = badCaptures[badCapturesPicked++].move;
- if(move != ttMove && move != mateKiller &&
- pos->move_is_legal(move, pinned))
- return move;
- }
- break;
-
- case PH_QCAPTURES:
- assert(!pos->is_check());
- assert(movesPicked >= 0);
- while(movesPicked < numOfMoves) {
- bestScore = -10000000;
- if(movesPicked < 4) {
- bestIndex = -1;
- for(int i = movesPicked; i < numOfMoves; i++)
- if(moves[i].score > bestScore) {
- bestIndex = i;
- bestScore = moves[i].score;
+ while (true)
+ {
+ while (cur == endMoves)
+ generate_next_stage();
+
+ switch (stage) {
+
+ case MAIN_SEARCH: case EVASION: case QSEARCH_WITH_CHECKS:
+ case QSEARCH_WITHOUT_CHECKS: case PROBCUT:
+ ++cur;
+ return ttMove;
+
+ case GOOD_CAPTURES:
+ move = pick_best(cur++, endMoves);
+ if (move != ttMove)
+ {
+ if (pos.see_sign(move) >= VALUE_ZERO)
+ return move;
+
+ // Losing capture, move it to the tail of the array
+ *endBadCaptures-- = move;
}
+ break;
+
+ case KILLERS:
+ move = *cur++;
+ if ( move != MOVE_NONE
+ && move != ttMove
+ && pos.pseudo_legal(move)
+ && !pos.capture(move))
+ return move;
+ break;
+
+ case GOOD_QUIETS: case BAD_QUIETS:
+ move = *cur++;
+ if ( move != ttMove
+ && move != killers[0]
+ && move != killers[1]
+ && move != killers[2])
+ return move;
+ break;
+
+ case BAD_CAPTURES:
+ return *cur--;
+
+ case ALL_EVASIONS: case QCAPTURES_1: case QCAPTURES_2:
+ move = pick_best(cur++, endMoves);
+ if (move != ttMove)
+ return move;
+ break;
+
+ case PROBCUT_CAPTURES:
+ move = pick_best(cur++, endMoves);
+ if (move != ttMove && pos.see(move) > captureThreshold)
+ return move;
+ break;
+
+ case RECAPTURES:
+ move = pick_best(cur++, endMoves);
+ if (to_sq(move) == recaptureSquare)
+ return move;
+ break;
+
+ case CHECKS:
+ move = *cur++;
+ if (move != ttMove)
+ return move;
+ break;
+
+ case STOP:
+ return MOVE_NONE;
+
+ default:
+ assert(false);
}
- else
- bestIndex = movesPicked;
-
- if(bestIndex != -1) {
- move = moves[bestIndex].move;
- moves[bestIndex] = moves[movesPicked++];
- // Remember to change the line below if we decide to hash the qsearch!
- // Maybe also postpone the legality check until after futility pruning?
- if(/* move != ttMove && */ pos->move_is_legal(move, pinned))
- return move;
- }
- }
- break;
-
- case PH_QCHECKS:
- assert(!pos->is_check());
- assert(movesPicked >= 0);
- // Perhaps we should do something better than just picking the first
- // move here? FIXME
- while(movesPicked < numOfMoves) {
- move = moves[movesPicked++].move;
- // Remember to change the line below if we decide to hash the qsearch!
- if(/* move != ttMove && */ pos->move_is_legal(move, pinned))
- return move;
- }
- break;
-
- default:
- break;
}
-
- return MOVE_NONE;
}
-MovePicker::MovegenPhase MovePicker::current_move_type() const {
- return PhaseTable[phaseIndex];
-}
-/// MovePicker::init_phase_table() initializes the PhaseTable[],
-/// MainSearchPhaseIndex, EvasionPhaseIndex, QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex
-/// and QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex variables. It is only called once
-/// during program startup, and never again while the program is running.
-
-void MovePicker::init_phase_table() {
- int i = 0;
-
- // Main search
- MainSearchPhaseIndex = i - 1;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_TT_MOVE;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_MATE_KILLER;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_GOOD_CAPTURES;
- // PH_KILLER_1 and PH_KILLER_2 are not yet used.
- // PhaseTable[i++] = PH_KILLER_1;
- // PhaseTable[i++] = PH_KILLER_2;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_NONCAPTURES;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_BAD_CAPTURES;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP;
-
- // Check evasions
- EvasionsPhaseIndex = i - 1;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_EVASIONS;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP;
-
- // Quiescence search with checks
- QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex = i - 1;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCAPTURES;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCHECKS;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP;
-
- // Quiescence search without checks
- QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex = i - 1;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCAPTURES;
- PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP;
-}
+/// Version of next_move() to use at split point nodes where the move is grabbed
+/// from the split point's shared MovePicker object. This function is not thread
+/// safe so must be lock protected by the caller.
+template<>
+Move MovePicker::next_move() { return ss->splitPoint->movePicker->next_move(); }