X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=1e82203a7775f7e4232f5b27f469667c6049b7c6;hb=5930c0defbe01576315d7d081447f94a01daf337;hp=8d9dc04fc486073697588e2a0a8b48b3be58dbf1;hpb=28442195c7d168a87221c6f1ae9ac51893427250;p=stockfish diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index 8d9dc04f..1e82203a 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ namespace { // Futility margin Value futility_margin(Depth d, bool improving) { - return Value(154 * (d - improving)); + return Value(140 * (d - improving)); } // Reductions lookup table, initialized at startup @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ namespace { Depth reduction(bool i, Depth d, int mn, Value delta, Value rootDelta) { int r = Reductions[d] * Reductions[mn]; - return (r + 1449 - int(delta) * 937 / int(rootDelta)) / 1024 + (!i && r > 941); + return (r + 1372 - int(delta) * 1073 / int(rootDelta)) / 1024 + (!i && r > 936); } constexpr int futility_move_count(bool improving, Depth depth) { @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ namespace { // History and stats update bonus, based on depth int stat_bonus(Depth d) { - return std::min(341 * d - 470, 1710); + return std::min(336 * d - 547, 1561); } // Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3-fold blindness @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ namespace { void Search::init() { for (int i = 1; i < MAX_MOVES; ++i) - Reductions[i] = int((19.47 + std::log(Threads.size()) / 2) * std::log(i)); + Reductions[i] = int((20.57 + std::log(Threads.size()) / 2) * std::log(i)); } @@ -348,12 +348,12 @@ void Thread::search() { // Reset aspiration window starting size Value prev = rootMoves[pvIdx].averageScore; - delta = Value(10) + int(prev) * prev / 16502; + delta = Value(10) + int(prev) * prev / 15799; alpha = std::max(prev - delta,-VALUE_INFINITE); beta = std::min(prev + delta, VALUE_INFINITE); // Adjust optimism based on root move's previousScore - int opt = 102 * prev / (std::abs(prev) + 147); + int opt = 109 * prev / (std::abs(prev) + 141); optimism[ us] = Value(opt); optimism[~us] = -optimism[us]; @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ void Thread::search() { else break; - delta += delta / 4 + 2; + delta += delta / 3; assert(alpha >= -VALUE_INFINITE && beta <= VALUE_INFINITE); } @@ -615,10 +615,9 @@ namespace { // At non-PV nodes we check for an early TT cutoff if ( !PvNode - && ss->ttHit && !excludedMove && tte->depth() > depth - (tte->bound() == BOUND_EXACT) - && ttValue != VALUE_NONE // Possible in case of TT access race + && ttValue != VALUE_NONE // Possible in case of TT access race or if !ttHit && (tte->bound() & (ttValue >= beta ? BOUND_LOWER : BOUND_UPPER))) { // If ttMove is quiet, update move sorting heuristics on TT hit (~2 Elo) @@ -742,7 +741,7 @@ namespace { // Use static evaluation difference to improve quiet move ordering (~4 Elo) if (is_ok((ss-1)->currentMove) && !(ss-1)->inCheck && !priorCapture) { - int bonus = std::clamp(-19 * int((ss-1)->staticEval + ss->staticEval), -1920, 1920); + int bonus = std::clamp(-18 * int((ss-1)->staticEval + ss->staticEval), -1817, 1817); thisThread->mainHistory[~us][from_to((ss-1)->currentMove)] << bonus; } @@ -752,13 +751,13 @@ namespace { // margin and the improving flag are used in various pruning heuristics. improvement = (ss-2)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-2)->staticEval : (ss-4)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-4)->staticEval - : 156; + : 173; improving = improvement > 0; // Step 7. Razoring (~1 Elo). // If eval is really low check with qsearch if it can exceed alpha, if it can't, // return a fail low. - if (eval < alpha - 426 - 256 * depth * depth) + if (eval < alpha - 456 - 252 * depth * depth) { value = qsearch(pos, ss, alpha - 1, alpha); if (value < alpha) @@ -769,18 +768,18 @@ namespace { // The depth condition is important for mate finding. if ( !ss->ttPv && depth < 9 - && eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) - (ss-1)->statScore / 280 >= beta + && eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) - (ss-1)->statScore / 306 >= beta && eval >= beta - && eval < 25128) // larger than VALUE_KNOWN_WIN, but smaller than TB wins + && eval < 24923) // larger than VALUE_KNOWN_WIN, but smaller than TB wins return eval; // Step 9. Null move search with verification search (~35 Elo) if ( !PvNode && (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL - && (ss-1)->statScore < 18755 + && (ss-1)->statScore < 17329 && eval >= beta && eval >= ss->staticEval - && ss->staticEval >= beta - 20 * depth - improvement / 13 + 253 + && ss->staticEval >= beta - 21 * depth - improvement * 99 / 1300 + 258 && !excludedMove && pos.non_pawn_material(us) && (ss->ply >= thisThread->nmpMinPly)) @@ -788,7 +787,7 @@ namespace { assert(eval - beta >= 0); // Null move dynamic reduction based on depth and eval - Depth R = std::min(int(eval - beta) / 172, 6) + depth / 3 + 4; + Depth R = std::min(int(eval - beta) / 173, 6) + depth / 3 + 4; ss->currentMove = MOVE_NULL; ss->continuationHistory = &thisThread->continuationHistory[0][0][NO_PIECE][0]; @@ -823,20 +822,19 @@ namespace { } } - probCutBeta = beta + 186 - 54 * improving; + probCutBeta = beta + 168 - 61 * improving; // Step 10. ProbCut (~10 Elo) // If we have a good enough capture (or queen promotion) and a reduced search returns a value // much above beta, we can (almost) safely prune the previous move. if ( !PvNode - && depth > 4 + && depth > 3 && abs(beta) < VALUE_TB_WIN_IN_MAX_PLY // if value from transposition table is lower than probCutBeta, don't attempt probCut // there and in further interactions with transposition table cutoff depth is set to depth - 3 // because probCut search has depth set to depth - 4 but we also do a move before it // so effective depth is equal to depth - 3 - && !( ss->ttHit - && tte->depth() >= depth - 3 + && !( tte->depth() >= depth - 3 && ttValue != VALUE_NONE && ttValue < probCutBeta)) { @@ -887,20 +885,19 @@ namespace { return qsearch(pos, ss, alpha, beta); if ( cutNode - && depth >= 7 + && depth >= 8 && !ttMove) depth -= 2; moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here // Step 12. A small Probcut idea, when we are in check (~4 Elo) - probCutBeta = beta + 391; + probCutBeta = beta + 413; if ( ss->inCheck && !PvNode - && depth >= 2 && ttCapture && (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER) - && tte->depth() >= depth - 3 + && tte->depth() >= depth - 4 && ttValue >= probCutBeta && abs(ttValue) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN && abs(beta) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN) @@ -979,40 +976,22 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here moveCountPruning = moveCount >= futility_move_count(improving, depth); // Reduced depth of the next LMR search - int lmrDepth = std::max(newDepth - r, 0); + int lmrDepth = newDepth - r; if ( capture || givesCheck) { // Futility pruning for captures (~2 Elo) if ( !givesCheck - && lmrDepth < 6 + && lmrDepth < 7 && !ss->inCheck - && ss->staticEval + 182 + 230 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[EG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(move))] + && ss->staticEval + 197 + 248 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[EG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(move))] + captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] / 7 < alpha) continue; - Bitboard occupied; // SEE based pruning (~11 Elo) - if (!pos.see_ge(move, occupied, Value(-206) * depth)) - { - if (depth < 2 - capture) + if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-205) * depth)) continue; - // Don't prune the move if opp. King/Queen/Rook gets a discovered attack during or after the exchanges - Bitboard leftEnemies = pos.pieces(~us, KING, QUEEN, ROOK); - Bitboard attacks = 0; - occupied |= to_sq(move); - while (leftEnemies && !attacks) - { - Square sq = pop_lsb(leftEnemies); - attacks = pos.attackers_to(sq, occupied) & pos.pieces(us) & occupied; - // Exclude Queen/Rook(s) which were already threatened before SEE (opp King can't be in check when it's our turn) - if (attacks && sq != pos.square(~us) && (pos.attackers_to(sq, pos.pieces()) & pos.pieces(us))) - attacks = 0; - } - if (!attacks) - continue; - } } else { @@ -1021,25 +1000,25 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]; // Continuation history based pruning (~2 Elo) - if ( lmrDepth < 5 - && history < -4405 * (depth - 1)) + if ( lmrDepth < 6 + && history < -3832 * depth) continue; history += 2 * thisThread->mainHistory[us][from_to(move)]; - lmrDepth += history / 7278; + lmrDepth += history / 7011; lmrDepth = std::max(lmrDepth, -2); // Futility pruning: parent node (~13 Elo) if ( !ss->inCheck - && lmrDepth < 13 - && ss->staticEval + 103 + 138 * lmrDepth <= alpha) + && lmrDepth < 12 + && ss->staticEval + 112 + 138 * lmrDepth <= alpha) continue; lmrDepth = std::max(lmrDepth, 0); // Prune moves with negative SEE (~4 Elo) - if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-24 * lmrDepth * lmrDepth - 16 * lmrDepth))) + if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-27 * lmrDepth * lmrDepth - 16 * lmrDepth))) continue; } } @@ -1054,7 +1033,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here // a reduced search on all the other moves but the ttMove and if the // result is lower than ttValue minus a margin, then we will extend the ttMove. if ( !rootNode - && depth >= 4 - (thisThread->completedDepth > 21) + 2 * (PvNode && tte->is_pv()) + && depth >= 4 - (thisThread->completedDepth > 22) + 2 * (PvNode && tte->is_pv()) && move == ttMove && !excludedMove // Avoid recursive singular search /* && ttValue != VALUE_NONE Already implicit in the next condition */ @@ -1062,7 +1041,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here && (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER) && tte->depth() >= depth - 3) { - Value singularBeta = ttValue - (3 + 2 * (ss->ttPv && !PvNode)) * depth / 2; + Value singularBeta = ttValue - (82 + 65 * (ss->ttPv && !PvNode)) * depth / 64; Depth singularDepth = (depth - 1) / 2; ss->excludedMove = move; @@ -1076,8 +1055,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here // Avoid search explosion by limiting the number of double extensions if ( !PvNode - && value < singularBeta - 25 - && ss->doubleExtensions <= 10) + && value < singularBeta - 21 + && ss->doubleExtensions <= 11) { extension = 2; depth += depth < 13; @@ -1106,16 +1085,14 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here } // Check extensions (~1 Elo) - else if ( givesCheck - && depth > 10 - && abs(ss->staticEval) > 88) + else if ( givesCheck && depth > 8) extension = 1; // Quiet ttMove extensions (~1 Elo) else if ( PvNode && move == ttMove && move == ss->killers[0] - && (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] >= 5705) + && (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] >= 5168) extension = 1; } @@ -1144,7 +1121,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here r -= cutNode && tte->depth() >= depth + 3 ? 3 : 2; // Decrease reduction if opponent's move count is high (~1 Elo) - if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 7) + if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 8) r--; // Increase reduction for cut nodes (~3 Elo) @@ -1174,10 +1151,10 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here + (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - - 4082; + - 4006; // Decrease/increase reduction for moves with a good/bad history (~25 Elo) - r -= ss->statScore / (11079 + 4626 * (depth > 6 && depth < 19)); + r -= ss->statScore / (11124 + 4740 * (depth > 5 && depth < 22)); // Step 17. Late moves reduction / extension (LMR, ~117 Elo) // We use various heuristics for the sons of a node after the first son has @@ -1201,8 +1178,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here { // Adjust full depth search based on LMR results - if result // was good enough search deeper, if it was bad enough search shallower - const bool doDeeperSearch = value > (alpha + 58 + 12 * (newDepth - d)); - const bool doEvenDeeperSearch = value > alpha + 588 && ss->doubleExtensions <= 5; + const bool doDeeperSearch = value > (bestValue + 64 + 11 * (newDepth - d)); + const bool doEvenDeeperSearch = value > alpha + 711 && ss->doubleExtensions <= 6; const bool doShallowerSearch = value < bestValue + newDepth; ss->doubleExtensions = ss->doubleExtensions + doEvenDeeperSearch; @@ -1227,7 +1204,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here if (!ttMove && cutNode) r += 2; - value = -search(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth - (r > 4), !cutNode); + value = -search(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth - (r > 3), !cutNode); } // For PV nodes only, do a full PV search on the first move or after a fail @@ -1310,22 +1287,23 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here if (PvNode && !rootNode) // Update pv even in fail-high case update_pv(ss->pv, move, (ss+1)->pv); - if (PvNode && value < beta) // Update alpha! Always alpha < beta + if (value >= beta) + { + ss->cutoffCnt += 1 + !ttMove; + assert(value >= beta); // Fail high + break; + } + else { // Reduce other moves if we have found at least one score improvement (~1 Elo) + // Reduce more for depth > 3 and depth < 12 (~1 Elo) if ( depth > 1 - && beta < 12535 - && value > -12535) - depth -= 1; + && beta < 14362 + && value > -12393) + depth -= depth > 3 && depth < 12 ? 2 : 1; assert(depth > 0); - alpha = value; - } - else - { - ss->cutoffCnt += 1 + !ttMove; - assert(value >= beta); // Fail high - break; + alpha = value; // Update alpha! Always alpha < beta } } } @@ -1370,7 +1348,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here // Bonus for prior countermove that caused the fail low else if (!priorCapture && prevSq != SQ_NONE) { - int bonus = (depth > 5) + (PvNode || cutNode) + (bestValue < alpha - 97 * depth) + ((ss-1)->moveCount > 10); + int bonus = (depth > 5) + (PvNode || cutNode) + (bestValue < alpha - 113 * depth) + ((ss-1)->moveCount > 12); update_continuation_histories(ss-1, pos.piece_on(prevSq), prevSq, stat_bonus(depth) * bonus); } @@ -1454,9 +1432,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here // At non-PV nodes we check for an early TT cutoff if ( !PvNode - && ss->ttHit && tte->depth() >= ttDepth - && ttValue != VALUE_NONE // Only in case of TT access race + && ttValue != VALUE_NONE // Only in case of TT access race or if !ttHit && (tte->bound() & (ttValue >= beta ? BOUND_LOWER : BOUND_UPPER))) return ttValue; @@ -1499,7 +1476,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here if (PvNode && bestValue > alpha) alpha = bestValue; - futilityBase = bestValue + 168; + futilityBase = bestValue + 200; } const PieceToHistory* contHist[] = { (ss-1)->continuationHistory, (ss-2)->continuationHistory, @@ -1572,7 +1549,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here continue; // Do not search moves with bad enough SEE values (~5 Elo) - if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-110))) + if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-95))) continue; } @@ -1705,7 +1682,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here if (!pos.capture_stage(bestMove)) { - int bonus2 = bestValue > beta + 153 ? bonus1 // larger bonus + int bonus2 = bestValue > beta + 145 ? bonus1 // larger bonus : stat_bonus(depth); // smaller bonus // Increase stats for the best move in case it was a quiet move