Updated documentation: Tell about recursion in internal ls; tell that we have Debian...

diff --git a/doc/CHANGES b/doc/CHANGES
index a6e48f65d36ee7db276a0429e559ddf6d51679c3..40a20e11e0c048ef1733c4d5bfcbf826d3db3eaf 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/CHANGES
+++ b/doc/CHANGES
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ CHANGES-0.0.8.
 - Fixed a LOT of bugs, some segfaulting, some minor.
 - MAJOR performance improvements in almost all areas. One of the main
   contributors in this area has been Dan Kegel (see the CREDITS file).
-- Some changes to compile better under Debian GNU/Linux. A .deb-file was ready,
-  but due to lost access of a Debian-system, this was discontinued :-(
+- Some changes to compile better under Debian GNU/Linux, a debian/ directory,
+  and .deb files available for download.
 - BetaFTPD will now try to install itself (wow! (not)) in the same directory as
   the file called `ftpd', if you have that file.
 - Support for non-Linux platforms! For now, only SunOS/SVR4 and FreeBSD.  SunOS
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ CHANGES-0.0.8.
 - root (or any other user with uid=0) can't FTP anymore.
 - .spec file (for you RPM junkies :-) ), provided by Sean MacLennan
   <seanm@netwinder.org>.
+- Recursive directory listings (`-R' to the internal ls).
 
 Version 0.0.7:
 - Shadow support. (Give --enable-shadow to configure to enable it.)

diff --git a/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE b/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE
index 2ad0e2836159cc2ea6917ce997860ec2a82d7e14..1213aa6b7c5599ef496c013805e00d674d2f5eca 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE
+++ b/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE
@@ -40,9 +40,10 @@ The RETR command is believed to be compliant with RFC959. (There is no default
 data port, though -- I'm unsure about this.)
 
 LIST/NLST:
-The LIST and NLST commands ignore some flags (like `-R') given to them. (This
-is much better than it was before, though.) The RFCs say nothing about
-directory listing formats anyway, but I guess this is a violation of GNU ls :-)
+The LIST and NLST commands ignore some flags (like `-1') given to them. (This
+is much better than it was before, though, even recursive listings should work
+now.) The RFCs say nothing about directory listing formats anyway, but I guess
+this is a violation of GNU ls :-)
 
 REST:
 The REST command is implemented, but it doesn't check that its argument really