From 0e130e6beff03105c637bafc3482b8860ac0056b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sgunderson Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 17:27:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Updated documentation: Tell about recursion in internal ls; tell that we have Debian packages again. --- doc/CHANGES | 5 +++-- doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/CHANGES b/doc/CHANGES index a6e48f6..40a20e1 100644 --- a/doc/CHANGES +++ b/doc/CHANGES @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ CHANGES-0.0.8. - Fixed a LOT of bugs, some segfaulting, some minor. - MAJOR performance improvements in almost all areas. One of the main contributors in this area has been Dan Kegel (see the CREDITS file). -- Some changes to compile better under Debian GNU/Linux. A .deb-file was ready, - but due to lost access of a Debian-system, this was discontinued :-( +- Some changes to compile better under Debian GNU/Linux, a debian/ directory, + and .deb files available for download. - BetaFTPD will now try to install itself (wow! (not)) in the same directory as the file called `ftpd', if you have that file. - Support for non-Linux platforms! For now, only SunOS/SVR4 and FreeBSD. SunOS @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ CHANGES-0.0.8. - root (or any other user with uid=0) can't FTP anymore. - .spec file (for you RPM junkies :-) ), provided by Sean MacLennan . +- Recursive directory listings (`-R' to the internal ls). Version 0.0.7: - Shadow support. (Give --enable-shadow to configure to enable it.) diff --git a/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE b/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE index 2ad0e28..1213aa6 100644 --- a/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE +++ b/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE @@ -40,9 +40,10 @@ The RETR command is believed to be compliant with RFC959. (There is no default data port, though -- I'm unsure about this.) LIST/NLST: -The LIST and NLST commands ignore some flags (like `-R') given to them. (This -is much better than it was before, though.) The RFCs say nothing about -directory listing formats anyway, but I guess this is a violation of GNU ls :-) +The LIST and NLST commands ignore some flags (like `-1') given to them. (This +is much better than it was before, though, even recursive listings should work +now.) The RFCs say nothing about directory listing formats anyway, but I guess +this is a violation of GNU ls :-) REST: The REST command is implemented, but it doesn't check that its argument really -- 2.39.2