From: Steinar H. Gunderson Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:18:39 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Be more consistent about how we handle textures and bouncing; either bounce them... X-Git-Tag: 1.0~262 X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=movit;a=commitdiff_plain;h=abb7221a797bb5332f9ff9346396beb4c95dcc34;ds=inline Be more consistent about how we handle textures and bouncing; either bounce them, or do not. Trying to do both (in different phases) causes issues currently. --- diff --git a/effect_chain.cpp b/effect_chain.cpp index 64e3dec..d509fba 100644 --- a/effect_chain.cpp +++ b/effect_chain.cpp @@ -330,13 +330,27 @@ void EffectChain::construct_glsl_programs(Node *output) start_new_phase = true; } - if (deps[i]->outgoing_links.size() > 1 && deps[i]->effect->num_inputs() > 0) { - // More than one effect uses this as the input, - // and it is not a texture itself. - // The easiest thing to do (and probably also the safest - // performance-wise in most cases) is to bounce it to a texture - // and then let the next passes read from that. - start_new_phase = true; + if (deps[i]->outgoing_links.size() > 1) { + if (deps[i]->effect->num_inputs() > 0) { + // More than one effect uses this as the input, + // and it is not a texture itself. + // The easiest thing to do (and probably also the safest + // performance-wise in most cases) is to bounce it to a texture + // and then let the next passes read from that. + start_new_phase = true; + } else { + // For textures, we try to be slightly more clever; + // if none of our outputs need a bounce, we don't bounce + // but instead simply use the effect many times. + // + // Strictly speaking, we could bounce it for some outputs + // and use it directly for others, but the processing becomes + // somewhat simpler if the effect is only used in one such way. + for (unsigned j = 0; j < deps[i]->outgoing_links.size(); ++j) { + Node *rdep = deps[i]->outgoing_links[j]; + start_new_phase |= rdep->effect->needs_texture_bounce(); + } + } } if (deps[i]->effect->changes_output_size()) {