X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fmovepick.cpp;h=7e338dbf62de586ec2e14fa0346eaab44c36b875;hp=4b08e1b46d35c07e95bd65cf547e459f1bdbe86e;hb=b088f0aefd658261e9231b556382acf532920513;hpb=3e0753bef36e5efeed700d7277187f6fbd7275f5 diff --git a/src/movepick.cpp b/src/movepick.cpp index 4b08e1b4..7e338dbf 100644 --- a/src/movepick.cpp +++ b/src/movepick.cpp @@ -42,12 +42,13 @@ namespace { /// Variables - MovePicker::MovegenPhase PhaseTable[32]; - int MainSearchPhaseIndex; - int EvasionsPhaseIndex; - int QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex; - int QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex; - + CACHE_LINE_ALIGNMENT + const MovegenPhaseT MainSearchPhaseTable[] = { PH_STOP, PH_NULL_MOVE, PH_TT_MOVES, PH_GOOD_CAPTURES, PH_KILLERS, PH_NONCAPTURES, PH_BAD_CAPTURES, PH_STOP}; + const MovegenPhaseT MainSearchNoNullPhaseTable[] = { PH_STOP, PH_TT_MOVES, PH_GOOD_CAPTURES, PH_KILLERS, PH_NONCAPTURES, PH_BAD_CAPTURES, PH_STOP}; + const MovegenPhaseT LowSearchPhaseTable[] = { PH_STOP, PH_TT_MOVES, PH_GOOD_CAPTURES, PH_NULL_MOVE, PH_KILLERS, PH_NONCAPTURES, PH_BAD_CAPTURES, PH_STOP}; + const MovegenPhaseT EvasionsPhaseTable[] = { PH_STOP, PH_EVASIONS, PH_STOP}; + const MovegenPhaseT QsearchWithChecksPhaseTable[] = { PH_STOP, PH_TT_MOVES, PH_QCAPTURES, PH_QCHECKS, PH_STOP}; + const MovegenPhaseT QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseTable[] = { PH_STOP, PH_TT_MOVES, PH_QCAPTURES, PH_STOP}; } @@ -64,34 +65,34 @@ namespace { /// move ordering is at the current node. MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, Depth d, - const History& h, SearchStack* ss) : pos(p), H(h) { - ttMove = ttm; + const History& h, SearchStack* ss, bool useNullMove) : pos(p), H(h) { + ttMoves[0] = ttm; if (ss) { - mateKiller = (ss->mateKiller == ttm)? MOVE_NONE : ss->mateKiller; - killer1 = ss->killers[0]; - killer2 = ss->killers[1]; + ttMoves[1] = (ss->mateKiller == ttm)? MOVE_NONE : ss->mateKiller; + killers[0] = ss->killers[0]; + killers[1] = ss->killers[1]; } else - mateKiller = killer1 = killer2 = MOVE_NONE; + ttMoves[1] = killers[0] = killers[1] = MOVE_NONE; movesPicked = numOfMoves = numOfBadCaptures = 0; - checkKillers = checkLegal = finished = false; + finished = false; if (p.is_check()) - phaseIndex = EvasionsPhaseIndex; + phasePtr = EvasionsPhaseTable; + else if (d >= Depth(3 * OnePly)) + phasePtr = useNullMove ? MainSearchPhaseTable : MainSearchNoNullPhaseTable; else if (d > Depth(0)) - phaseIndex = MainSearchPhaseIndex; + phasePtr = useNullMove ? LowSearchPhaseTable : MainSearchNoNullPhaseTable; else if (d == Depth(0)) - phaseIndex = QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex; + phasePtr = QsearchWithChecksPhaseTable; else - phaseIndex = QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex; + phasePtr = QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseTable; Color us = pos.side_to_move(); dc = p.discovered_check_candidates(us); pinned = p.pinned_pieces(us); - - finished = false; } @@ -115,25 +116,14 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() { } // Next phase - phaseIndex++; - switch (PhaseTable[phaseIndex]) { - - case PH_TT_MOVE: - if (ttMove != MOVE_NONE) - { - assert(move_is_ok(ttMove)); - if (move_is_legal(pos, ttMove, pinned)) - return ttMove; - } - break; + phasePtr++; + switch (*phasePtr) { - case PH_MATE_KILLER: - if (mateKiller != MOVE_NONE) - { - assert(move_is_ok(mateKiller)); - if (move_is_legal(pos, mateKiller, pinned)) - return mateKiller; - } + case PH_NULL_MOVE: + return MOVE_NULL; + + case PH_TT_MOVES: + movesPicked = 0; // This is used as index to ttMoves[] break; case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: @@ -141,30 +131,22 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() { score_captures(); std::sort(moves, moves + numOfMoves); movesPicked = 0; - checkLegal = true; break; case PH_KILLERS: - movesPicked = numOfMoves = 0; - checkLegal = false; - if (killer1 != MOVE_NONE && move_is_legal(pos, killer1, pinned) && !pos.move_is_capture(killer1)) - moves[numOfMoves++].move = killer1; - if (killer2 != MOVE_NONE && move_is_legal(pos, killer2, pinned) && !pos.move_is_capture(killer2) ) - moves[numOfMoves++].move = killer2; + movesPicked = 0; // This is used as index to killers[] break; case PH_NONCAPTURES: - checkKillers = (numOfMoves != 0); // previous phase is PH_KILLERS numOfMoves = generate_noncaptures(pos, moves); score_noncaptures(); std::sort(moves, moves + numOfMoves); movesPicked = 0; - checkLegal = true; break; case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: - // Bad captures SEE value is already calculated by score_captures() - // so just sort them to get SEE move ordering. + // Bad captures SEE value is already calculated so just sort them + // to get SEE move ordering. std::sort(badCaptures, badCaptures + numOfBadCaptures); movesPicked = 0; break; @@ -179,7 +161,7 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() { case PH_QCAPTURES: numOfMoves = generate_captures(pos, moves); - score_qcaptures(); + score_captures(); std::sort(moves, moves + numOfMoves); movesPicked = 0; break; @@ -229,38 +211,28 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move(Lock &lock) { void MovePicker::score_captures() { // Winning and equal captures in the main search are ordered by MVV/LVA. // Suprisingly, this appears to perform slightly better than SEE based - // move ordering. The reason is probably that in a position with a winning + // move ordering. The reason is probably that in a position with a winning // capture, capturing a more valuable (but sufficiently defended) piece - // first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and + // first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and // the hanging piece will still be hanging (except in the unusual cases // where it is possible to recapture with the hanging piece). Exchanging // big pieces before capturing a hanging piece probably helps to reduce // the subtree size. - // While scoring captures it moves all captures with negative SEE values - // to the badCaptures[] array. + // In main search we want to push captures with negative SEE values to + // badCaptures[] array, but instead of doing it now we delay till when + // the move has been picked up in pick_move_from_list(), this way we save + // some SEE calls in case we get a cutoff (idea from Pablo Vazquez). Move m; - int seeValue; + // Use MVV/LVA ordering for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) { m = moves[i].move; - seeValue = pos.see(m); - if (seeValue >= 0) - { - if (move_promotion(m)) - moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame; - else - moves[i].score = int(pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m))) - -int(pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m))); - } + if (move_is_promotion(m)) + moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame; else - { - // Losing capture, move it to the badCaptures[] array - assert(numOfBadCaptures < 63); - moves[i].score = seeValue; - badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures++] = moves[i]; - moves[i--] = moves[--numOfMoves]; - } + moves[i].score = int(pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m))) + -int(pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m))); } } @@ -268,20 +240,23 @@ void MovePicker::score_noncaptures() { // First score by history, when no history is available then use // piece/square tables values. This seems to be better then a // random choice when we don't have an history for any move. - Move m; + Piece piece; + Square from, to; int hs; for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) { - m = moves[i].move; - hs = H.move_ordering_score(pos.piece_on(move_from(m)), move_to(m)); + from = move_from(moves[i].move); + to = move_to(moves[i].move); + piece = pos.piece_on(from); + hs = H.move_ordering_score(piece, to); // Ensure history is always preferred to pst if (hs > 0) hs += 1000; // pst based scoring - moves[i].score = hs + pos.mg_pst_delta(m); + moves[i].score = hs + pos.pst_delta(piece, from, to); } } @@ -290,7 +265,7 @@ void MovePicker::score_evasions() { for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) { Move m = moves[i].move; - if (m == ttMove) + if (m == ttMoves[0]) moves[i].score = 2*HistoryMax; else if (!pos.square_is_empty(move_to(m))) { @@ -301,20 +276,6 @@ void MovePicker::score_evasions() { } } -void MovePicker::score_qcaptures() { - - // Use MVV/LVA ordering - for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) - { - Move m = moves[i].move; - if (move_promotion(m)) - moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame; - else - moves[i].score = int(pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m))) - -int(pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m))); - } -} - /// MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() picks the move with the biggest score /// from a list of generated moves (moves[] or badCaptures[], depending on @@ -324,21 +285,63 @@ void MovePicker::score_qcaptures() { Move MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() { assert(movesPicked >= 0); - assert(!pos.is_check() || PhaseTable[phaseIndex] == PH_EVASIONS || PhaseTable[phaseIndex] == PH_STOP); - assert( pos.is_check() || PhaseTable[phaseIndex] != PH_EVASIONS); + assert(!pos.is_check() || *phasePtr == PH_EVASIONS || *phasePtr == PH_STOP); + assert( pos.is_check() || *phasePtr != PH_EVASIONS); - switch (PhaseTable[phaseIndex]) { + switch (*phasePtr) { + + case PH_TT_MOVES: + while (movesPicked < 2) { + Move move = ttMoves[movesPicked++]; + if ( move != MOVE_NONE + && move_is_legal(pos, move, pinned)) + return move; + } + break; case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: + while (movesPicked < numOfMoves) + { + Move move = moves[movesPicked++].move; + if ( move != ttMoves[0] + && move != ttMoves[1] + && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) + { + // Check for a non negative SEE now + int seeValue = pos.see_sign(move); + if (seeValue >= 0) + return move; + + // Losing capture, move it to the badCaptures[] array, note + // that move has now been already checked for legality. + assert(numOfBadCaptures < 63); + badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures].move = move; + badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures++].score = seeValue; + } + } + break; + case PH_KILLERS: + while (movesPicked < 2) { + Move move = killers[movesPicked++]; + if ( move != MOVE_NONE + && move != ttMoves[0] + && move != ttMoves[1] + && move_is_legal(pos, move, pinned) + && !pos.move_is_capture(move)) + return move; + } + break; + case PH_NONCAPTURES: while (movesPicked < numOfMoves) { Move move = moves[movesPicked++].move; - if ( move != ttMove - && move != mateKiller - && (!checkKillers || (move != killer1 && move != killer2)) - && (!checkLegal || pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned))) + if ( move != ttMoves[0] + && move != ttMoves[1] + && move != killers[0] + && move != killers[1] + && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) return move; } break; @@ -346,18 +349,11 @@ Move MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() { case PH_EVASIONS: if (movesPicked < numOfMoves) return moves[movesPicked++].move; - break; case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: - while (movesPicked < numOfBadCaptures) - { - Move move = badCaptures[movesPicked++].move; - if ( move != ttMove - && move != mateKiller - && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) - return move; - } + if (movesPicked < numOfBadCaptures) + return badCaptures[movesPicked++].move; break; case PH_QCAPTURES: @@ -366,7 +362,7 @@ Move MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() { { Move move = moves[movesPicked++].move; // Maybe postpone the legality check until after futility pruning? - if ( move != ttMove + if ( move != ttMoves[0] && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) return move; } @@ -377,42 +373,3 @@ Move MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() { } return MOVE_NONE; } - - -/// MovePicker::init_phase_table() initializes the PhaseTable[], -/// MainSearchPhaseIndex, EvasionPhaseIndex, QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex -/// and QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex. It is only called once during -/// program startup, and never again while the program is running. - -void MovePicker::init_phase_table() { - - int i = 0; - - // Main search - MainSearchPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_TT_MOVE; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_MATE_KILLER; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_GOOD_CAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_KILLERS; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_NONCAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_BAD_CAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; - - // Check evasions - EvasionsPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_EVASIONS; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; - - // Quiescence search with checks - QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_TT_MOVE; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCHECKS; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; - - // Quiescence search without checks - QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_TT_MOVE; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; -}