X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fmovepick.cpp;h=aa6f7c19bc9ac9aa45b5368133d7010f155f32ee;hp=3897f4c10048bf7c164d67c4c2e9858e597c3994;hb=877b468e3e8a3b7f7482266007237c6974f7f282;hpb=436fa5c8fa5302f69a83ad28491702c5dc3d4af7 diff --git a/src/movepick.cpp b/src/movepick.cpp index 3897f4c1..aa6f7c19 100644 --- a/src/movepick.cpp +++ b/src/movepick.cpp @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* Stockfish, a UCI chess playing engine derived from Glaurung 2.1 Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tord Romstad (Glaurung author) - Copyright (C) 2008-2009 Marco Costalba + Copyright (C) 2008-2010 Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski, Tord Romstad Stockfish is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by @@ -23,11 +23,9 @@ //// Includes //// -#include #include #include "history.h" -#include "evaluate.h" #include "movegen.h" #include "movepick.h" #include "search.h" @@ -40,14 +38,23 @@ namespace { - /// Variables - - MovePicker::MovegenPhase PhaseTable[32]; - int MainSearchPhaseIndex; - int EvasionsPhaseIndex; - int QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex; - int QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex; - + enum MovegenPhase { + PH_TT_MOVES, // Transposition table move and mate killer + PH_GOOD_CAPTURES, // Queen promotions and captures with SEE values >= 0 + PH_KILLERS, // Killer moves from the current ply + PH_NONCAPTURES, // Non-captures and underpromotions + PH_BAD_CAPTURES, // Queen promotions and captures with SEE values < 0 + PH_EVASIONS, // Check evasions + PH_QCAPTURES, // Captures in quiescence search + PH_QCHECKS, // Non-capture checks in quiescence search + PH_STOP + }; + + CACHE_LINE_ALIGNMENT + const uint8_t MainSearchPhaseTable[] = { PH_TT_MOVES, PH_GOOD_CAPTURES, PH_KILLERS, PH_NONCAPTURES, PH_BAD_CAPTURES, PH_STOP}; + const uint8_t EvasionsPhaseTable[] = { PH_TT_MOVES, PH_EVASIONS, PH_STOP}; + const uint8_t QsearchWithChecksPhaseTable[] = { PH_TT_MOVES, PH_QCAPTURES, PH_QCHECKS, PH_STOP}; + const uint8_t QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseTable[] = { PH_TT_MOVES, PH_QCAPTURES, PH_STOP}; } @@ -56,195 +63,153 @@ namespace { //// -/// Constructor for the MovePicker class. Apart from the position for which +/// Constructor for the MovePicker class. Apart from the position for which /// it is asked to pick legal moves, MovePicker also wants some information /// to help it to return the presumably good moves first, to decide which /// moves to return (in the quiescence search, for instance, we only want to /// search captures, promotions and some checks) and about how important good /// move ordering is at the current node. -MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, bool pv, Move ttm, - const SearchStack& ss, Depth d) : pos(p) { - pvNode = pv; - ttMove = ttm; - mateKiller = (ss.mateKiller == ttm)? MOVE_NONE : ss.mateKiller; - killer1 = ss.killers[0]; - killer2 = ss.killers[1]; - depth = d; - movesPicked = 0; - numOfMoves = 0; - numOfBadCaptures = 0; +MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, Depth d, const History& h, + SearchStack* ss, Value beta) : pos(p), H(h) { + int searchTT = ttm; + ttMoves[0].move = ttm; + badCaptureThreshold = 0; + badCaptures = moves + MOVES_MAX; + + pinned = p.pinned_pieces(pos.side_to_move()); + + if (ss && !p.is_check()) + { + ttMoves[1].move = (ss->mateKiller == ttm) ? MOVE_NONE : ss->mateKiller; + searchTT |= ttMoves[1].move; + killers[0].move = ss->killers[0]; + killers[1].move = ss->killers[1]; + } else + ttMoves[1].move = killers[0].move = killers[1].move = MOVE_NONE; if (p.is_check()) - phaseIndex = EvasionsPhaseIndex; - else if (depth > Depth(0)) - phaseIndex = MainSearchPhaseIndex; - else if (depth == Depth(0)) - phaseIndex = QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex; - else - phaseIndex = QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex; + phasePtr = EvasionsPhaseTable; + else if (d > DEPTH_ZERO) + { + // Consider sligtly negative captures as good if at low + // depth and far from beta. + if (ss && ss->eval < beta - PawnValueMidgame && d < 3 * ONE_PLY) + badCaptureThreshold = -PawnValueMidgame; - Color us = pos.side_to_move(); + phasePtr = MainSearchPhaseTable; + } + else if (d >= DEPTH_QS_CHECKS) + phasePtr = QsearchWithChecksPhaseTable; + else + { + phasePtr = QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseTable; - dc = p.discovered_check_candidates(us); - pinned = p.pinned_pieces(us); + // Skip TT move if is not a capture or a promotion, this avoids + // qsearch tree explosion due to a possible perpetual check or + // similar rare cases when TT table is full. + if (ttm != MOVE_NONE && !pos.move_is_capture_or_promotion(ttm)) + searchTT = ttMoves[0].move = MOVE_NONE; + } - finished = false; + phasePtr += int(!searchTT) - 1; + go_next_phase(); } -/// MovePicker::get_next_move() is the most important method of the MovePicker -/// class. It returns a new legal move every time it is called, until there -/// are no more moves left of the types we are interested in. +/// MovePicker::go_next_phase() generates, scores and sorts the next bunch +/// of moves when there are no more moves to try for the current phase. -Move MovePicker::get_next_move() { +void MovePicker::go_next_phase() { - Move move; + curMove = moves; + phase = *(++phasePtr); + switch (phase) { - while (true) - { - // If we already have a list of generated moves, pick the best move from - // the list, and return it. - move = pick_move_from_list(); - if (move != MOVE_NONE) - { - assert(move_is_ok(move)); - return move; - } - - // Next phase - phaseIndex++; - switch (PhaseTable[phaseIndex]) { - - case PH_TT_MOVE: - if (ttMove != MOVE_NONE) - { - assert(move_is_ok(ttMove)); - if (move_is_legal(pos, ttMove, pinned)) - return ttMove; - } - break; - - case PH_MATE_KILLER: - if (mateKiller != MOVE_NONE) - { - assert(move_is_ok(mateKiller)); - if (move_is_legal(pos, mateKiller, pinned)) - return mateKiller; - } - break; - - case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: - numOfMoves = generate_captures(pos, moves); - score_captures(); - std::sort(moves, moves + numOfMoves); - movesPicked = 0; - break; - - case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: - // It's probably a good idea to use SEE move ordering here. FIXME - movesPicked = 0; - break; - - case PH_NONCAPTURES: - numOfMoves = generate_noncaptures(pos, moves); - score_noncaptures(); - std::sort(moves, moves + numOfMoves); - movesPicked = 0; - break; - - case PH_EVASIONS: - assert(pos.is_check()); - numOfMoves = generate_evasions(pos, moves, pinned); - score_evasions(); - std::sort(moves, moves + numOfMoves); - movesPicked = 0; - break; - - case PH_QCAPTURES: - numOfMoves = generate_captures(pos, moves); - score_qcaptures(); - std::sort(moves, moves + numOfMoves); - movesPicked = 0; - break; - - case PH_QCHECKS: - // Perhaps we should order moves move here? FIXME - numOfMoves = generate_non_capture_checks(pos, moves, dc); - movesPicked = 0; - break; - - case PH_STOP: - return MOVE_NONE; - - default: - assert(false); - return MOVE_NONE; - } - } -} + case PH_TT_MOVES: + curMove = ttMoves; + lastMove = curMove + 2; + return; + case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: + lastMove = generate(pos, moves); + score_captures(); + return; + + case PH_KILLERS: + curMove = killers; + lastMove = curMove + 2; + return; -/// A variant of get_next_move() which takes a lock as a parameter, used to -/// prevent multiple threads from picking the same move at a split point. + case PH_NONCAPTURES: + lastMove = generate(pos, moves); + score_noncaptures(); + sort_moves(moves, lastMove, &lastGoodNonCapture); + return; + + case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: + // Bad captures SEE value is already calculated so just pick + // them in order to get SEE move ordering. + curMove = badCaptures; + lastMove = moves + MOVES_MAX; + return; + + case PH_EVASIONS: + assert(pos.is_check()); + lastMove = generate(pos, moves); + score_evasions(); + return; + + case PH_QCAPTURES: + lastMove = generate(pos, moves); + score_captures(); + return; -Move MovePicker::get_next_move(Lock &lock) { + case PH_QCHECKS: + lastMove = generate(pos, moves); + return; - lock_grab(&lock); - if (finished) - { - lock_release(&lock); - return MOVE_NONE; - } - Move m = get_next_move(); - if (m == MOVE_NONE) - finished = true; + case PH_STOP: + lastMove = curMove + 1; // Avoids another go_next_phase() call + return; - lock_release(&lock); - return m; + default: + assert(false); + return; + } } -/// MovePicker::score_captures(), MovePicker::score_noncaptures(), -/// MovePicker::score_evasions() and MovePicker::score_qcaptures() assign a -/// numerical move ordering score to each move in a move list. The moves -/// with highest scores will be picked first by pick_move_from_list(). +/// MovePicker::score_captures(), MovePicker::score_noncaptures() and +/// MovePicker::score_evasions() assign a numerical move ordering score +/// to each move in a move list. The moves with highest scores will be +/// picked first by get_next_move(). void MovePicker::score_captures() { // Winning and equal captures in the main search are ordered by MVV/LVA. // Suprisingly, this appears to perform slightly better than SEE based - // move ordering. The reason is probably that in a position with a winning + // move ordering. The reason is probably that in a position with a winning // capture, capturing a more valuable (but sufficiently defended) piece - // first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and + // first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and // the hanging piece will still be hanging (except in the unusual cases // where it is possible to recapture with the hanging piece). Exchanging // big pieces before capturing a hanging piece probably helps to reduce // the subtree size. - // While scoring captures it moves all captures with negative SEE values - // to the badCaptures[] array. + // In main search we want to push captures with negative SEE values to + // badCaptures[] array, but instead of doing it now we delay till when + // the move has been picked up in pick_move_from_list(), this way we save + // some SEE calls in case we get a cutoff (idea from Pablo Vazquez). Move m; - int seeValue; - for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) + // Use MVV/LVA ordering + for (MoveStack* cur = moves; cur != lastMove; cur++) { - m = moves[i].move; - seeValue = pos.see(m); - if (seeValue >= 0) - { - if (move_promotion(m)) - moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame; - else - moves[i].score = int(pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m))) - -int(pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m))); - } + m = cur->move; + if (move_is_promotion(m)) + cur->score = QueenValueMidgame; else - { - // Losing capture, move it to the badCaptures[] array - assert(numOfBadCaptures < 63); - moves[i].score = seeValue; - badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures++] = moves[i]; - moves[i--] = moves[--numOfMoves]; - } + cur->score = pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m)) + - pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m)); } } @@ -253,156 +218,140 @@ void MovePicker::score_noncaptures() { // piece/square tables values. This seems to be better then a // random choice when we don't have an history for any move. Move m; - int hs; + Piece piece; + Square from, to; - for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) + for (MoveStack* cur = moves; cur != lastMove; cur++) { - m = moves[i].move; - - if (m == killer1) - hs = HistoryMax + 2; - else if (m == killer2) - hs = HistoryMax + 1; - else - hs = H.move_ordering_score(pos.piece_on(move_from(m)), move_to(m)); - - // Ensure history is always preferred to pst - if (hs > 0) - hs += 1000; - - // pst based scoring - moves[i].score = hs + pos.mg_pst_delta(m); + m = cur->move; + from = move_from(m); + to = move_to(m); + piece = pos.piece_on(from); + cur->score = H.value(piece, to) + H.gain(piece, to); } } void MovePicker::score_evasions() { + // Try good captures ordered by MVV/LVA, then non-captures if + // destination square is not under attack, ordered by history + // value, and at the end bad-captures and non-captures with a + // negative SEE. This last group is ordered by the SEE score. + Move m; + int seeScore; - for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) - { - Move m = moves[i].move; - if (m == ttMove) - moves[i].score = 2*HistoryMax; - else if (!pos.square_is_empty(move_to(m))) - { - int seeScore = pos.see(m); - moves[i].score = (seeScore >= 0)? seeScore + HistoryMax : seeScore; - } else - moves[i].score = H.move_ordering_score(pos.piece_on(move_from(m)), move_to(m)); - } -} - -void MovePicker::score_qcaptures() { + // Skip if we don't have at least two moves to order + if (lastMove < moves + 2) + return; - // Use MVV/LVA ordering - for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++) + for (MoveStack* cur = moves; cur != lastMove; cur++) { - Move m = moves[i].move; - if (move_promotion(m)) - moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame; + m = cur->move; + if ((seeScore = pos.see_sign(m)) < 0) + cur->score = seeScore - History::MaxValue; // Be sure we are at the bottom + else if (pos.move_is_capture(m)) + cur->score = pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m)) + - pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m)) + History::MaxValue; else - moves[i].score = int(pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m))) - -int(pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m))); + cur->score = H.value(pos.piece_on(move_from(m)), move_to(m)); } } +/// MovePicker::get_next_move() is the most important method of the MovePicker +/// class. It returns a new legal move every time it is called, until there +/// are no more moves left. +/// It picks the move with the biggest score from a list of generated moves taking +/// care not to return the tt move if has already been searched previously. +/// Note that this function is not thread safe so should be lock protected by +/// caller when accessed through a shared MovePicker object. -/// MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() picks the move with the biggest score -/// from a list of generated moves (moves[] or badCaptures[], depending on -/// the current move generation phase). It takes care not to return the -/// transposition table move if that has already been serched previously. - -Move MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() { - - assert(movesPicked >= 0); - assert(!pos.is_check() || PhaseTable[phaseIndex] == PH_EVASIONS || PhaseTable[phaseIndex] == PH_STOP); - assert( pos.is_check() || PhaseTable[phaseIndex] != PH_EVASIONS); - - switch (PhaseTable[phaseIndex]) { - - case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: - case PH_NONCAPTURES: - while (movesPicked < numOfMoves) - { - Move move = moves[movesPicked++].move; - if ( move != ttMove - && move != mateKiller - && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) - return move; - } - break; - - case PH_EVASIONS: - if (movesPicked < numOfMoves) - return moves[movesPicked++].move; +Move MovePicker::get_next_move() { - break; + Move move; - case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: - while (movesPicked < numOfBadCaptures) + while (true) + { + while (curMove != lastMove) { - Move move = badCaptures[movesPicked++].move; - if ( move != ttMove - && move != mateKiller - && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) + switch (phase) { + + case PH_TT_MOVES: + move = (curMove++)->move; + if ( move != MOVE_NONE + && move_is_legal(pos, move, pinned)) + return move; + break; + + case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: + move = pick_best(curMove++, lastMove).move; + if ( move != ttMoves[0].move + && move != ttMoves[1].move + && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) + { + // Check for a non negative SEE now + int seeValue = pos.see_sign(move); + if (seeValue >= badCaptureThreshold) + return move; + + // Losing capture, move it to the tail of the array, note + // that move has now been already checked for legality. + (--badCaptures)->move = move; + badCaptures->score = seeValue; + } + break; + + case PH_KILLERS: + move = (curMove++)->move; + if ( move != MOVE_NONE + && move_is_legal(pos, move, pinned) + && move != ttMoves[0].move + && move != ttMoves[1].move + && !pos.move_is_capture(move)) + return move; + break; + + case PH_NONCAPTURES: + + // Sort negative scored moves only when we get there + if (curMove == lastGoodNonCapture) + insertion_sort(lastGoodNonCapture, lastMove); + + move = (curMove++)->move; + if ( move != ttMoves[0].move + && move != ttMoves[1].move + && move != killers[0].move + && move != killers[1].move + && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) + return move; + break; + + case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: + move = pick_best(curMove++, lastMove).move; return move; - } - break; - case PH_QCAPTURES: - case PH_QCHECKS: - while (movesPicked < numOfMoves) - { - Move move = moves[movesPicked++].move; - // Maybe postpone the legality check until after futility pruning? - if ( move != ttMove - && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) - return move; + case PH_EVASIONS: + case PH_QCAPTURES: + move = pick_best(curMove++, lastMove).move; + if ( move != ttMoves[0].move + && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) + return move; + break; + + case PH_QCHECKS: + move = (curMove++)->move; + if ( move != ttMoves[0].move + && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) + return move; + break; + + case PH_STOP: + return MOVE_NONE; + + default: + assert(false); + break; + } } - break; - - default: - break; + go_next_phase(); } - return MOVE_NONE; } - -/// MovePicker::init_phase_table() initializes the PhaseTable[], -/// MainSearchPhaseIndex, EvasionPhaseIndex, QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex -/// and QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex. It is only called once during -/// program startup, and never again while the program is running. - -void MovePicker::init_phase_table() { - - int i = 0; - - // Main search - MainSearchPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_TT_MOVE; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_MATE_KILLER; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_GOOD_CAPTURES; - // PH_KILLER_1 and PH_KILLER_2 are not yet used. - // PhaseTable[i++] = PH_KILLER_1; - // PhaseTable[i++] = PH_KILLER_2; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_NONCAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_BAD_CAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; - - // Check evasions - EvasionsPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_EVASIONS; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; - - // Quiescence search with checks - QsearchWithChecksPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_TT_MOVE; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCHECKS; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; - - // Quiescence search without checks - QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex = i - 1; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_TT_MOVE; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_QCAPTURES; - PhaseTable[i++] = PH_STOP; -}