X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=05773469c64220ca2d201c151504c5446e379f8b;hp=b8b325e57202f885ee24ee727f35fb11d59d1898;hb=f811a5693e5c65637923f5f72e6d95d9d7b4f858;hpb=f026517e5ee4db8dca5eb2bfd9ce7078a9d39725 diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index b8b325e5..05773469 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* Stockfish, a UCI chess playing engine derived from Glaurung 2.1 Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tord Romstad (Glaurung author) - Copyright (C) 2008-2013 Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski, Tord Romstad + Copyright (C) 2008-2014 Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski, Tord Romstad Stockfish is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by @@ -77,13 +77,13 @@ namespace { return (Depth) Reductions[PvNode][i][std::min(int(d) / ONE_PLY, 63)][std::min(mn, 63)]; } - size_t PVSize, PVIdx; + size_t MultiPV, PVIdx; TimeManager TimeMgr; double BestMoveChanges; Value DrawValue[COLOR_NB]; HistoryStats History; GainsStats Gains; - CountermovesStats Countermoves; + MovesStats Countermoves, Followupmoves; template Value search(Position& pos, Stack* ss, Value alpha, Value beta, Depth depth, bool cutNode); @@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ namespace { void id_loop(Position& pos); Value value_to_tt(Value v, int ply); Value value_from_tt(Value v, int ply); - bool allows(const Position& pos, Move first, Move second); - bool refutes(const Position& pos, Move first, Move second); + void update_stats(Position& pos, Stack* ss, Move move, Depth depth, Move* quiets, int quietsCnt); string uci_pv(const Position& pos, int depth, Value alpha, Value beta); struct Skill { @@ -128,7 +127,7 @@ void Search::init() { // Init reductions array for (hd = 1; hd < 64; ++hd) for (mc = 1; mc < 64; ++mc) { - double pvRed = log(double(hd)) * log(double(mc)) / 3.0; + double pvRed = 0.00 + log(double(hd)) * log(double(mc)) / 3.00; double nonPVRed = 0.33 + log(double(hd)) * log(double(mc)) / 2.25; Reductions[1][1][hd][mc] = (int8_t) ( pvRed >= 1.0 ? floor( pvRed * int(ONE_PLY)) : 0); Reductions[0][1][hd][mc] = (int8_t) (nonPVRed >= 1.0 ? floor(nonPVRed * int(ONE_PLY)) : 0); @@ -146,8 +145,8 @@ void Search::init() { // Init futility move count array for (d = 0; d < 32; ++d) { - FutilityMoveCounts[0][d] = int(2.4 + 0.222 * pow(d + 0.0, 1.8)); - FutilityMoveCounts[1][d] = int(3.0 + 0.3 * pow(d + 0.98, 1.8)); + FutilityMoveCounts[0][d] = int(2.4 + 0.222 * pow(d + 0.00, 1.8)); + FutilityMoveCounts[1][d] = int(3.0 + 0.300 * pow(d + 0.98, 1.8)); } } @@ -155,10 +154,10 @@ void Search::init() { /// Search::perft() is our utility to verify move generation. All the leaf nodes /// up to the given depth are generated and counted and the sum returned. -static size_t perft(Position& pos, Depth depth) { +static uint64_t perft(Position& pos, Depth depth) { StateInfo st; - size_t cnt = 0; + uint64_t cnt = 0; CheckInfo ci(pos); const bool leaf = depth == 2 * ONE_PLY; @@ -171,7 +170,7 @@ static size_t perft(Position& pos, Depth depth) { return cnt; } -size_t Search::perft(Position& pos, Depth depth) { +uint64_t Search::perft(Position& pos, Depth depth) { return depth > ONE_PLY ? ::perft(pos, depth) : MoveList(pos).size(); } @@ -186,6 +185,10 @@ void Search::think() { RootColor = RootPos.side_to_move(); TimeMgr.init(Limits, RootPos.game_ply(), RootColor); + int cf = Options["Contempt Factor"] * PawnValueMg / 100; // From centipawns + DrawValue[ RootColor] = VALUE_DRAW - Value(cf); + DrawValue[~RootColor] = VALUE_DRAW + Value(cf); + if (RootMoves.empty()) { RootMoves.push_back(MOVE_NONE); @@ -207,16 +210,6 @@ void Search::think() { } } - if (Options["Contempt Factor"] && !Options["UCI_AnalyseMode"]) - { - int cf = Options["Contempt Factor"] * PawnValueMg / 100; // From centipawns - cf = cf * Material::game_phase(RootPos) / PHASE_MIDGAME; // Scale down with phase - DrawValue[ RootColor] = VALUE_DRAW - Value(cf); - DrawValue[~RootColor] = VALUE_DRAW + Value(cf); - } - else - DrawValue[WHITE] = DrawValue[BLACK] = VALUE_DRAW; - if (Options["Write Search Log"]) { Log log(Options["Search Log Filename"]); @@ -229,7 +222,7 @@ void Search::think() { << std::endl; } - // Reset the threads, still sleeping: will be wake up at split time + // Reset the threads, still sleeping: will wake up at split time for (size_t i = 0; i < Threads.size(); ++i) Threads[i]->maxPly = 0; @@ -305,22 +298,23 @@ namespace { History.clear(); Gains.clear(); Countermoves.clear(); + Followupmoves.clear(); - PVSize = Options["MultiPV"]; + MultiPV = Options["MultiPV"]; Skill skill(Options["Skill Level"]); // Do we have to play with skill handicap? In this case enable MultiPV search // that we will use behind the scenes to retrieve a set of possible moves. - if (skill.enabled() && PVSize < 4) - PVSize = 4; + if (skill.enabled() && MultiPV < 4) + MultiPV = 4; - PVSize = std::min(PVSize, RootMoves.size()); + MultiPV = std::min(MultiPV, RootMoves.size()); // Iterative deepening loop until requested to stop or target depth reached while (++depth <= MAX_PLY && !Signals.stop && (!Limits.depth || depth <= Limits.depth)) { // Age out PV variability metric - BestMoveChanges *= 0.8; + BestMoveChanges *= 0.5; // Save the last iteration's scores before first PV line is searched and // all the move scores except the (new) PV are set to -VALUE_INFINITE. @@ -328,7 +322,7 @@ namespace { RootMoves[i].prevScore = RootMoves[i].score; // MultiPV loop. We perform a full root search for each PV line - for (PVIdx = 0; PVIdx < PVSize && !Signals.stop; ++PVIdx) + for (PVIdx = 0; PVIdx < MultiPV && !Signals.stop; ++PVIdx) { // Reset aspiration window starting size if (depth >= 5) @@ -348,9 +342,9 @@ namespace { // Bring the best move to the front. It is critical that sorting // is done with a stable algorithm because all the values but the // first and eventually the new best one are set to -VALUE_INFINITE - // and we want to keep the same order for all the moves but the new - // PV that goes to the front. Note that in case of MultiPV search - // the already searched PV lines are preserved. + // and we want to keep the same order for all the moves except the + // new PV that goes to the front. Note that in case of MultiPV + // search the already searched PV lines are preserved. std::stable_sort(RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx, RootMoves.end()); // Write PV back to transposition table in case the relevant @@ -393,7 +387,7 @@ namespace { // Sort the PV lines searched so far and update the GUI std::stable_sort(RootMoves.begin(), RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx + 1); - if (PVIdx + 1 == PVSize || Time::now() - SearchTime > 3000) + if (PVIdx + 1 == MultiPV || Time::now() - SearchTime > 3000) sync_cout << uci_pv(pos, depth, alpha, beta) << sync_endl; } @@ -421,39 +415,14 @@ namespace { // Do we have time for the next iteration? Can we stop searching now? if (Limits.use_time_management() && !Signals.stop && !Signals.stopOnPonderhit) { - bool stop = false; // Local variable, not the volatile Signals.stop - // Take some extra time if the best move has changed - if (depth > 4 && depth < 50 && PVSize == 1) + if (depth > 4 && depth < 50 && MultiPV == 1) TimeMgr.pv_instability(BestMoveChanges); - // Stop the search if most of the available time has been used. We - // probably don't have enough time to search the first move at the - // next iteration anyway. - if (Time::now() - SearchTime > (TimeMgr.available_time() * 62) / 100) - stop = true; - - // Stop the search early if one move seems to be much better than others - if ( depth >= 12 - && BestMoveChanges <= DBL_EPSILON - && !stop - && PVSize == 1 - && bestValue > VALUE_MATED_IN_MAX_PLY - && ( RootMoves.size() == 1 - || Time::now() - SearchTime > (TimeMgr.available_time() * 20) / 100)) - { - Value rBeta = bestValue - 2 * PawnValueMg; - ss->excludedMove = RootMoves[0].pv[0]; - ss->skipNullMove = true; - Value v = search(pos, ss, rBeta - 1, rBeta, (depth - 3) * ONE_PLY, true); - ss->skipNullMove = false; - ss->excludedMove = MOVE_NONE; - - if (v < rBeta) - stop = true; - } - - if (stop) + // Stop the search if only one legal move is available or all + // of the available time has been used. + if ( RootMoves.size() == 1 + || Time::now() - SearchTime > TimeMgr.available_time()) { // If we are allowed to ponder do not stop the search now but // keep pondering until the GUI sends "ponderhit" or "stop". @@ -481,7 +450,7 @@ namespace { const bool SpNode = (NT == SplitPointPV || NT == SplitPointNonPV || NT == SplitPointRoot); const bool RootNode = (NT == Root || NT == SplitPointRoot); - assert(alpha >= -VALUE_INFINITE && alpha < beta && beta <= VALUE_INFINITE); + assert(-VALUE_INFINITE <= alpha && alpha < beta && beta <= VALUE_INFINITE); assert(PvNode || (alpha == beta - 1)); assert(depth > DEPTH_ZERO); @@ -490,7 +459,7 @@ namespace { const TTEntry *tte; SplitPoint* splitPoint; Key posKey; - Move ttMove, move, excludedMove, bestMove, threatMove; + Move ttMove, move, excludedMove, bestMove; Depth ext, newDepth, predictedDepth; Value bestValue, value, ttValue, eval, nullValue, futilityValue; bool inCheck, givesCheck, pvMove, singularExtensionNode, improving; @@ -505,7 +474,6 @@ namespace { { splitPoint = ss->splitPoint; bestMove = splitPoint->bestMove; - threatMove = splitPoint->threatMove; bestValue = splitPoint->bestValue; tte = NULL; ttMove = excludedMove = MOVE_NONE; @@ -518,7 +486,7 @@ namespace { moveCount = quietCount = 0; bestValue = -VALUE_INFINITE; - ss->currentMove = threatMove = (ss+1)->excludedMove = bestMove = MOVE_NONE; + ss->currentMove = ss->ttMove = (ss+1)->excludedMove = bestMove = MOVE_NONE; ss->ply = (ss-1)->ply + 1; (ss+1)->skipNullMove = false; (ss+1)->reduction = DEPTH_ZERO; (ss+2)->killers[0] = (ss+2)->killers[1] = MOVE_NONE; @@ -531,7 +499,7 @@ namespace { { // Step 2. Check for aborted search and immediate draw if (Signals.stop || pos.is_draw() || ss->ply > MAX_PLY) - return DrawValue[pos.side_to_move()]; + return ss->ply > MAX_PLY && !inCheck ? evaluate(pos) : DrawValue[pos.side_to_move()]; // Step 3. Mate distance pruning. Even if we mate at the next move our score // would be at best mate_in(ss->ply+1), but if alpha is already bigger because @@ -551,7 +519,7 @@ namespace { excludedMove = ss->excludedMove; posKey = excludedMove ? pos.exclusion_key() : pos.key(); tte = TT.probe(posKey); - ttMove = RootNode ? RootMoves[PVIdx].pv[0] : tte ? tte->move() : MOVE_NONE; + ss->ttMove = ttMove = RootNode ? RootMoves[PVIdx].pv[0] : tte ? tte->move() : MOVE_NONE; ttValue = tte ? value_from_tt(tte->value(), ss->ply) : VALUE_NONE; // At PV nodes we check for exact scores, whilst at non-PV nodes we check for @@ -566,17 +534,12 @@ namespace { : ttValue >= beta ? (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER) : (tte->bound() & BOUND_UPPER))) { - TT.refresh(tte); ss->currentMove = ttMove; // Can be MOVE_NONE - if ( ttValue >= beta - && ttMove - && !pos.capture_or_promotion(ttMove) - && ttMove != ss->killers[0]) - { - ss->killers[1] = ss->killers[0]; - ss->killers[0] = ttMove; - } + // If ttMove is quiet, update killers, history, counter move and followup move on TT hit + if (ttValue >= beta && ttMove && !pos.capture_or_promotion(ttMove) && !inCheck) + update_stats(pos, ss, ttMove, depth, NULL, 0); + return ttValue; } @@ -617,16 +580,14 @@ namespace { // Step 6. Razoring (skipped when in check) if ( !PvNode && depth < 4 * ONE_PLY - && eval + razor_margin(depth) < beta + && eval + razor_margin(depth) <= alpha && ttMove == MOVE_NONE && abs(beta) < VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY && !pos.pawn_on_7th(pos.side_to_move())) { - Value rbeta = beta - razor_margin(depth); - Value v = qsearch(pos, ss, rbeta-1, rbeta, DEPTH_ZERO); - if (v < rbeta) - // Logically we should return (v + razor_margin(depth)), but - // surprisingly this performed slightly weaker in tests. + Value ralpha = alpha - razor_margin(depth); + Value v = qsearch(pos, ss, ralpha, ralpha+1, DEPTH_ZERO); + if (v <= ralpha) return v; } @@ -650,17 +611,17 @@ namespace { { ss->currentMove = MOVE_NULL; - // Null move dynamic reduction based on depth - Depth R = 3 * ONE_PLY + depth / 4; + assert(eval - beta >= 0); - // Null move dynamic reduction based on value - if (eval - PawnValueMg > beta) - R += ONE_PLY; + // Null move dynamic reduction based on depth and value + Depth R = 3 * ONE_PLY + + depth / 4 + + int(eval - beta) / PawnValueMg * ONE_PLY; pos.do_null_move(st); (ss+1)->skipNullMove = true; - nullValue = depth-R < ONE_PLY ? -qsearch(pos, ss+1, -beta, -alpha, DEPTH_ZERO) - : - search(pos, ss+1, -beta, -alpha, depth-R, !cutNode); + nullValue = depth-R < ONE_PLY ? -qsearch(pos, ss+1, -beta, -beta+1, DEPTH_ZERO) + : - search(pos, ss+1, -beta, -beta+1, depth-R, !cutNode); (ss+1)->skipNullMove = false; pos.undo_null_move(); @@ -675,28 +636,13 @@ namespace { // Do verification search at high depths ss->skipNullMove = true; - Value v = search(pos, ss, alpha, beta, depth-R, false); + Value v = depth-R < ONE_PLY ? qsearch(pos, ss, beta-1, beta, DEPTH_ZERO) + : search(pos, ss, beta-1, beta, depth-R, false); ss->skipNullMove = false; if (v >= beta) return nullValue; } - else - { - // The null move failed low, which means that we may be faced with - // some kind of threat. If the previous move was reduced, check if - // the move that refuted the null move was somehow connected to the - // move which was reduced. If a connection is found, return a fail - // low score (which will cause the reduced move to fail high in the - // parent node, which will trigger a re-search with full depth). - threatMove = (ss+1)->currentMove; - - if ( depth < 5 * ONE_PLY - && (ss-1)->reduction - && threatMove != MOVE_NONE - && allows(pos, (ss-1)->currentMove, threatMove)) - return alpha; - } } // Step 9. ProbCut (skipped when in check) @@ -708,8 +654,8 @@ namespace { && !ss->skipNullMove && abs(beta) < VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY) { - Value rbeta = beta + 200; - Depth rdepth = depth - ONE_PLY - 3 * ONE_PLY; + Value rbeta = std::min(beta + 200, VALUE_INFINITE); + Depth rdepth = depth - 4 * ONE_PLY; assert(rdepth >= ONE_PLY); assert((ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NONE); @@ -731,8 +677,8 @@ namespace { } // Step 10. Internal iterative deepening (skipped when in check) - if ( depth >= (PvNode ? 5 * ONE_PLY : 8 * ONE_PLY) - && ttMove == MOVE_NONE + if ( depth >= (PvNode ? 5 * ONE_PLY : 8 * ONE_PLY) + && !ttMove && (PvNode || ss->staticEval + Value(256) >= beta)) { Depth d = depth - 2 * ONE_PLY - (PvNode ? DEPTH_ZERO : depth / 4); @@ -751,7 +697,11 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here Move countermoves[] = { Countermoves[pos.piece_on(prevMoveSq)][prevMoveSq].first, Countermoves[pos.piece_on(prevMoveSq)][prevMoveSq].second }; - MovePicker mp(pos, ttMove, depth, History, countermoves, ss); + Square prevOwnMoveSq = to_sq((ss-2)->currentMove); + Move followupmoves[] = { Followupmoves[pos.piece_on(prevOwnMoveSq)][prevOwnMoveSq].first, + Followupmoves[pos.piece_on(prevOwnMoveSq)][prevOwnMoveSq].second }; + + MovePicker mp(pos, ttMove, depth, History, countermoves, followupmoves, ss); CheckInfo ci(pos); value = bestValue; // Workaround a bogus 'uninitialized' warning under gcc improving = ss->staticEval >= (ss-2)->staticEval @@ -776,7 +726,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here continue; // At root obey the "searchmoves" option and skip moves not listed in Root - // Move List, as a consequence any illegal move is also skipped. In MultiPV + // Move List. As a consequence any illegal move is also skipped. In MultiPV // mode we also skip PV moves which have been already searched. if (RootNode && !std::count(RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx, RootMoves.end(), move)) continue; @@ -805,13 +755,17 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here ext = DEPTH_ZERO; captureOrPromotion = pos.capture_or_promotion(move); - givesCheck = pos.gives_check(move, ci); + + givesCheck = type_of(move) == NORMAL && !ci.dcCandidates + ? ci.checkSq[type_of(pos.piece_on(from_sq(move)))] & to_sq(move) + : pos.gives_check(move, ci); + dangerous = givesCheck || type_of(move) != NORMAL || pos.advanced_pawn_push(move); // Step 12. Extend checks - if (givesCheck && pos.see_sign(move) >= 0) + if (givesCheck && pos.see_sign(move) >= VALUE_ZERO) ext = ONE_PLY; // Singular extension search. If all moves but one fail low on a search of @@ -851,8 +805,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here { // Move count based pruning if ( depth < 16 * ONE_PLY - && moveCount >= FutilityMoveCounts[improving][depth] - && (!threatMove || !refutes(pos, move, threatMove))) + && moveCount >= FutilityMoveCounts[improving][depth] ) { if (SpNode) splitPoint->mutex.lock(); @@ -883,7 +836,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here } // Prune moves with negative SEE at low depths - if (predictedDepth < 4 * ONE_PLY && pos.see_sign(move) < 0) + if (predictedDepth < 4 * ONE_PLY && pos.see_sign(move) < VALUE_ZERO) { if (SpNode) splitPoint->mutex.lock(); @@ -907,7 +860,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here // Step 14. Make the move pos.do_move(move, st, ci, givesCheck); - // Step 15. Reduced depth search (LMR). If the move fails high will be + // Step 15. Reduced depth search (LMR). If the move fails high it will be // re-searched at full depth. if ( depth >= 3 * ONE_PLY && !pvMove @@ -933,6 +886,13 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here value = -search(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, d, true); + // Research at intermediate depth if reduction is very high + if (value > alpha && ss->reduction >= 4 * ONE_PLY) + { + Depth d2 = std::max(newDepth - 2 * ONE_PLY, ONE_PLY); + value = -search(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, d2, true); + } + doFullDepthSearch = (value > alpha && ss->reduction != DEPTH_ZERO); ss->reduction = DEPTH_ZERO; } @@ -1033,7 +993,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here assert(bestValue < beta); thisThread->split(pos, ss, alpha, beta, &bestValue, &bestMove, - depth, threatMove, moveCount, &mp, NT, cutNode); + depth, moveCount, &mp, NT, cutNode); if (bestValue >= beta) break; } @@ -1048,7 +1008,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here // case of Signals.stop or thread.cutoff_occurred() are set, but this is // harmless because return value is discarded anyhow in the parent nodes. // If we are in a singular extension search then return a fail low score. - // A split node has at least one move - the one tried before to be splitted. + // A split node has at least one move - the one tried before to be split. if (!moveCount) return excludedMove ? alpha : inCheck ? mated_in(ss->ply) : DrawValue[pos.side_to_move()]; @@ -1062,30 +1022,9 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here PvNode && bestMove ? BOUND_EXACT : BOUND_UPPER, depth, bestMove, ss->staticEval); - // Quiet best move: update killers, history and countermoves - if ( bestValue >= beta - && !pos.capture_or_promotion(bestMove) - && !inCheck) - { - if (ss->killers[0] != bestMove) - { - ss->killers[1] = ss->killers[0]; - ss->killers[0] = bestMove; - } - - // Increase history value of the cut-off move and decrease all the other - // played non-capture moves. - Value bonus = Value(int(depth) * int(depth)); - History.update(pos.moved_piece(bestMove), to_sq(bestMove), bonus); - for (int i = 0; i < quietCount - 1; ++i) - { - Move m = quietsSearched[i]; - History.update(pos.moved_piece(m), to_sq(m), -bonus); - } - - if (is_ok((ss-1)->currentMove)) - Countermoves.update(pos.piece_on(prevMoveSq), prevMoveSq, bestMove); - } + // Quiet best move: update killers, history, countermoves and followupmoves + if (bestValue >= beta && !pos.capture_or_promotion(bestMove) && !inCheck) + update_stats(pos, ss, bestMove, depth, quietsSearched, quietCount - 1); assert(bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && bestValue < VALUE_INFINITE); @@ -1125,7 +1064,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here // Check for an instant draw or if the maximum ply has been reached if (pos.is_draw() || ss->ply > MAX_PLY) - return DrawValue[pos.side_to_move()]; + return ss->ply > MAX_PLY && !InCheck ? evaluate(pos) : DrawValue[pos.side_to_move()]; // Decide whether or not to include checks: this fixes also the type of // TT entry depth that we are going to use. Note that in qsearch we use @@ -1200,7 +1139,9 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here { assert(is_ok(move)); - givesCheck = pos.gives_check(move, ci); + givesCheck = type_of(move) == NORMAL && !ci.dcCandidates + ? ci.checkSq[type_of(pos.piece_on(from_sq(move)))] & to_sq(move) + : pos.gives_check(move, ci); // Futility pruning if ( !PvNode @@ -1220,10 +1161,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here continue; } - // Prune moves with negative or equal SEE and also moves with positive - // SEE where capturing piece loses a tempo and SEE < beta - futilityBase. - if ( futilityBase < beta - && pos.see(move, beta - futilityBase) <= 0) + if (futilityBase < beta && pos.see(move) <= VALUE_ZERO) { bestValue = std::max(bestValue, futilityBase); continue; @@ -1241,7 +1179,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here && (!InCheck || evasionPrunable) && move != ttMove && type_of(move) != PROMOTION - && pos.see_sign(move) < 0) + && pos.see_sign(move) < VALUE_ZERO) continue; // Check for legality just before making the move @@ -1321,96 +1259,38 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here } - // allows() tests whether the 'first' move at previous ply somehow makes the - // 'second' move possible e.g. if the moving piece is the same in both moves. - // Normally the second move is the threat (the best move returned from a null - // search that fails low). - - bool allows(const Position& pos, Move first, Move second) { - - assert(is_ok(first)); - assert(is_ok(second)); - assert(color_of(pos.piece_on(from_sq(second))) == ~pos.side_to_move()); - assert(type_of(first) == CASTLING || color_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(first))) == ~pos.side_to_move()); - - Square m1from = from_sq(first); - Square m2from = from_sq(second); - Square m1to = to_sq(first); - Square m2to = to_sq(second); - - // The piece is the same or second's destination was vacated by the first move. - // We exclude the trivial case where a sliding piece does in two moves what - // it could do in one move: eg. Ra1a2, Ra2a3. - if ( m2to == m1from - || (m1to == m2from && !aligned(m1from, m2from, m2to))) - return true; + // update_stats() updates killers, history, countermoves and followupmoves stats after a fail-high + // of a quiet move. - // Second one moves through the square vacated by first one - if (between_bb(m2from, m2to) & m1from) - return true; + void update_stats(Position& pos, Stack* ss, Move move, Depth depth, Move* quiets, int quietsCnt) { - // Second's destination is defended by the first move's piece - Bitboard m1att = attacks_bb(pos.piece_on(m1to), m1to, pos.pieces() ^ m2from); - if (m1att & m2to) - return true; - - // Second move gives a discovered check through the first's checking piece - if (m1att & pos.king_square(pos.side_to_move())) + if (ss->killers[0] != move) { - assert(between_bb(m1to, pos.king_square(pos.side_to_move())) & m2from); - return true; + ss->killers[1] = ss->killers[0]; + ss->killers[0] = move; } - return false; - } - - - // refutes() tests whether a 'first' move is able to defend against a 'second' - // opponent's move. In this case will not be pruned. Normally the second move - // is the threat (the best move returned from a null search that fails low). - - bool refutes(const Position& pos, Move first, Move second) { - - assert(is_ok(first)); - assert(is_ok(second)); - - Square m1from = from_sq(first); - Square m2from = from_sq(second); - Square m1to = to_sq(first); - Square m2to = to_sq(second); - - // Don't prune moves of the threatened piece - if (m1from == m2to) - return true; - - // If the threatened piece has a value less than or equal to the value of - // the threat piece, don't prune moves which defend it. - if ( pos.capture(second) - && ( PieceValue[MG][pos.piece_on(m2from)] >= PieceValue[MG][pos.piece_on(m2to)] - || type_of(pos.piece_on(m2from)) == KING)) + // Increase history value of the cut-off move and decrease all the other + // played quiet moves. + Value bonus = Value(int(depth) * int(depth)); + History.update(pos.moved_piece(move), to_sq(move), bonus); + for (int i = 0; i < quietsCnt; ++i) { - // Update occupancy as if the piece and the threat are moving - Bitboard occ = pos.pieces() ^ m1from ^ m1to ^ m2from; - Piece pc = pos.piece_on(m1from); - - // Does the moved piece attack the square 'm2to' ? - if (attacks_bb(pc, m1to, occ) & m2to) - return true; - - // Scan for possible X-ray attackers behind the moved piece - Bitboard xray = (attacks_bb< ROOK>(m2to, occ) & pos.pieces(color_of(pc), QUEEN, ROOK)) - | (attacks_bb(m2to, occ) & pos.pieces(color_of(pc), QUEEN, BISHOP)); - - // Verify attackers are triggered by our move and not already exist - if (unlikely(xray) && (xray & ~pos.attacks_from(m2to))) - return true; + Move m = quiets[i]; + History.update(pos.moved_piece(m), to_sq(m), -bonus); } - // Don't prune safe moves which block the threat path - if ((between_bb(m2from, m2to) & m1to) && pos.see_sign(first) >= 0) - return true; + if (is_ok((ss-1)->currentMove)) + { + Square prevMoveSq = to_sq((ss-1)->currentMove); + Countermoves.update(pos.piece_on(prevMoveSq), prevMoveSq, move); + } - return false; + if (is_ok((ss-2)->currentMove) && (ss-1)->currentMove == (ss-1)->ttMove) + { + Square prevOwnMoveSq = to_sq((ss-2)->currentMove); + Followupmoves.update(pos.piece_on(prevOwnMoveSq), prevOwnMoveSq, move); + } } @@ -1426,7 +1306,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here rk.rand(); // RootMoves are already sorted by score in descending order - int variance = std::min(RootMoves[0].score - RootMoves[PVSize - 1].score, PawnValueMg); + int variance = std::min(RootMoves[0].score - RootMoves[MultiPV - 1].score, PawnValueMg); int weakness = 120 - 2 * level; int max_s = -VALUE_INFINITE; best = MOVE_NONE; @@ -1434,7 +1314,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here // Choose best move. For each move score we add two terms both dependent on // weakness. One deterministic and bigger for weaker moves, and one random, // then we choose the move with the resulting highest score. - for (size_t i = 0; i < PVSize; ++i) + for (size_t i = 0; i < MultiPV; ++i) { int s = RootMoves[i].score; @@ -1589,7 +1469,7 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { mutex.lock(); // If we are master and all slaves have finished then exit idle_loop - if (this_sp && !this_sp->slavesMask) + if (this_sp && this_sp->slavesMask.none()) { mutex.unlock(); break; @@ -1648,14 +1528,14 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { searching = false; activePosition = NULL; - sp->slavesMask &= ~(1ULL << idx); + sp->slavesMask.reset(idx); sp->nodes += pos.nodes_searched(); // Wake up the master thread so to allow it to return from the idle // loop in case we are the last slave of the split point. if ( Threads.sleepWhileIdle && this != sp->masterThread - && !sp->slavesMask) + && sp->slavesMask.none()) { assert(!sp->masterThread->searching); sp->masterThread->notify_one(); @@ -1670,10 +1550,10 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { // If this thread is the master of a split point and all slaves have finished // their work at this split point, return from the idle loop. - if (this_sp && !this_sp->slavesMask) + if (this_sp && this_sp->slavesMask.none()) { this_sp->mutex.lock(); - bool finished = !this_sp->slavesMask; // Retest under lock protection + bool finished = this_sp->slavesMask.none(); // Retest under lock protection this_sp->mutex.unlock(); if (finished) return; @@ -1716,13 +1596,10 @@ void check_time() { sp.mutex.lock(); nodes += sp.nodes; - Bitboard sm = sp.slavesMask; - while (sm) - { - Position* pos = Threads[pop_lsb(&sm)]->activePosition; - if (pos) - nodes += pos->nodes_searched(); - } + + for (size_t idx = 0; idx < Threads.size(); ++idx) + if (sp.slavesMask.test(idx) && Threads[idx]->activePosition) + nodes += Threads[idx]->activePosition->nodes_searched(); sp.mutex.unlock(); } @@ -1733,7 +1610,7 @@ void check_time() { Time::point elapsed = Time::now() - SearchTime; bool stillAtFirstMove = Signals.firstRootMove && !Signals.failedLowAtRoot - && elapsed > TimeMgr.available_time(); + && elapsed > TimeMgr.available_time() * 75 / 100; bool noMoreTime = elapsed > TimeMgr.maximum_time() - 2 * TimerThread::Resolution || stillAtFirstMove;