X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=5ff23ad0fd894791c7b5e8ac625246c40343e1e5;hp=b235a1e6384d98b56d86be13148334b43d43acb2;hb=36c82b751ce227c05bfb;hpb=bc38efd1288c8cb25179935998cfa3dc6c9f4410 diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index b235a1e6..5ff23ad0 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -293,7 +293,6 @@ namespace { Stack ss[MAX_PLY_PLUS_2]; int depth, prevBestMoveChanges; Value bestValue, alpha, beta, delta; - bool bestMoveNeverChanged = true; memset(ss, 0, 4 * sizeof(Stack)); depth = BestMoveChanges = 0; @@ -416,10 +415,6 @@ namespace { << std::endl; } - // Filter out startup noise when monitoring best move stability - if (depth > 2 && BestMoveChanges) - bestMoveNeverChanged = false; - // Do we have found a "mate in x"? if ( Limits.mate && bestValue >= VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY @@ -445,8 +440,8 @@ namespace { if ( depth >= 12 && !stop && PVSize == 1 - && ( (bestMoveNeverChanged && pos.captured_piece_type()) - || Time::now() - SearchTime > (TimeMgr.available_time() * 40) / 100)) + && ( RootMoves.size() == 1 + || Time::now() - SearchTime > (TimeMgr.available_time() * 20) / 100)) { Value rBeta = bestValue - 2 * PawnValueMg; (ss+1)->excludedMove = RootMoves[0].pv[0]; @@ -494,7 +489,7 @@ namespace { Move movesSearched[64]; StateInfo st; const TTEntry *tte; - SplitPoint* sp; + SplitPoint* splitPoint; Key posKey; Move ttMove, move, excludedMove, bestMove, threatMove; Depth ext, newDepth; @@ -511,15 +506,15 @@ namespace { if (SpNode) { - sp = ss->sp; - bestMove = sp->bestMove; - threatMove = sp->threatMove; - bestValue = sp->bestValue; + splitPoint = ss->splitPoint; + bestMove = splitPoint->bestMove; + threatMove = splitPoint->threatMove; + bestValue = splitPoint->bestValue; tte = NULL; ttMove = excludedMove = MOVE_NONE; ttValue = VALUE_NONE; - assert(sp->bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && sp->moveCount > 0); + assert(splitPoint->bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && splitPoint->moveCount > 0); goto split_point_start; } @@ -750,7 +745,7 @@ namespace { && ttMove == MOVE_NONE && (PvNode || (!inCheck && ss->staticEval + Value(256) >= beta))) { - Depth d = (PvNode ? depth - 2 * ONE_PLY : depth / 2); + Depth d = depth - 2 * ONE_PLY - (PvNode ? DEPTH_ZERO : depth / 4); ss->skipNullMove = true; search(pos, ss, alpha, beta, d); @@ -794,8 +789,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (!pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, ci.pinned)) continue; - moveCount = ++sp->moveCount; - sp->mutex.unlock(); + moveCount = ++splitPoint->moveCount; + splitPoint->mutex.unlock(); } else moveCount++; @@ -857,19 +852,20 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here newDepth = depth - ONE_PLY + ext; // Step 13. Futility pruning (is omitted in PV nodes) - if ( !captureOrPromotion + if ( !PvNode + && !captureOrPromotion && !inCheck && !dangerous - && move != ttMove) + && move != ttMove + && bestValue > VALUE_MATED_IN_MAX_PLY) { // Move count based pruning - if ( !PvNode - && depth < 16 * ONE_PLY + if ( depth < 16 * ONE_PLY && moveCount >= FutilityMoveCounts[depth] && (!threatMove || !refutes(pos, move, threatMove))) { if (SpNode) - sp->mutex.lock(); + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); continue; } @@ -879,22 +875,27 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // but fixing this made program slightly weaker. Depth predictedDepth = newDepth - reduction(depth, moveCount); futilityValue = ss->staticEval + ss->evalMargin + futility_margin(predictedDepth, moveCount) - + Gain[pos.piece_moved(move)][to_sq(move)]; + + 2 * Gain[pos.piece_moved(move)][to_sq(move)]; - if (!PvNode && futilityValue < beta) + if (futilityValue < beta) { - if (SpNode) - sp->mutex.lock(); + bestValue = std::max(bestValue, futilityValue); + if (SpNode) + { + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); + if (bestValue > splitPoint->bestValue) + splitPoint->bestValue = bestValue; + } continue; } // Prune moves with negative SEE at low depths - if ( predictedDepth < 2 * ONE_PLY + if ( predictedDepth < 4 * ONE_PLY && pos.see_sign(move) < 0) { if (SpNode) - sp->mutex.lock(); + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); continue; } @@ -927,7 +928,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here { ss->reduction = reduction(depth, moveCount); Depth d = std::max(newDepth - ss->reduction, ONE_PLY); - alpha = SpNode ? sp->alpha : alpha; + if (SpNode) + alpha = splitPoint->alpha; value = -search(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, d); @@ -940,7 +942,9 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // Step 16. Full depth search, when LMR is skipped or fails high if (doFullDepthSearch) { - alpha = SpNode ? sp->alpha : alpha; + if (SpNode) + alpha = splitPoint->alpha; + value = newDepth < ONE_PLY ? givesCheck ? -qsearch(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, DEPTH_ZERO) : -qsearch(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, DEPTH_ZERO) @@ -963,9 +967,9 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // Step 18. Check for new best move if (SpNode) { - sp->mutex.lock(); - bestValue = sp->bestValue; - alpha = sp->alpha; + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); + bestValue = splitPoint->bestValue; + alpha = splitPoint->alpha; } // Finished searching the move. If Signals.stop is true, the search @@ -1000,20 +1004,20 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (value > bestValue) { - bestValue = SpNode ? sp->bestValue = value : value; + bestValue = SpNode ? splitPoint->bestValue = value : value; if (value > alpha) { - bestMove = SpNode ? sp->bestMove = move : move; + bestMove = SpNode ? splitPoint->bestMove = move : move; if (PvNode && value < beta) // Update alpha! Always alpha < beta - alpha = SpNode ? sp->alpha = value : value; + alpha = SpNode ? splitPoint->alpha = value : value; else { assert(value >= beta); // Fail high if (SpNode) - sp->cutoff = true; + splitPoint->cutoff = true; break; } @@ -1127,6 +1131,12 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (pos.is_draw() || ss->ply > MAX_PLY) return DrawValue[pos.side_to_move()]; + // Decide whether or not to include checks, this fixes also the type of + // TT entry depth that we are going to use. Note that in qsearch we use + // only two types of depth in TT: DEPTH_QS_CHECKS or DEPTH_QS_NO_CHECKS. + ttDepth = InCheck || depth >= DEPTH_QS_CHECKS ? DEPTH_QS_CHECKS + : DEPTH_QS_NO_CHECKS; + // Transposition table lookup. At PV nodes, we don't use the TT for // pruning, but only for move ordering. posKey = pos.key(); @@ -1134,11 +1144,6 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here ttMove = tte ? tte->move() : MOVE_NONE; ttValue = tte ? value_from_tt(tte->value(),ss->ply) : VALUE_NONE; - // Decide whether or not to include checks, this fixes also the type of - // TT entry depth that we are going to use. Note that in qsearch we use - // only two types of depth in TT: DEPTH_QS_CHECKS or DEPTH_QS_NO_CHECKS. - ttDepth = InCheck || depth >= DEPTH_QS_CHECKS ? DEPTH_QS_CHECKS - : DEPTH_QS_NO_CHECKS; if ( tte && tte->depth() >= ttDepth && ttValue != VALUE_NONE // Only in case of TT access race @@ -1612,13 +1617,11 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { // Pointer 'this_sp' is not null only if we are called from split(), and not // at the thread creation. So it means we are the split point's master. - const SplitPoint* this_sp = splitPointsSize ? activeSplitPoint : NULL; + SplitPoint* this_sp = splitPointsSize ? activeSplitPoint : NULL; assert(!this_sp || (this_sp->masterThread == this && searching)); - // If this thread is the master of a split point and all slaves have finished - // their work at this split point, return from the idle loop. - while (!this_sp || this_sp->slavesMask) + while (true) { // If we are not searching, wait for a condition to be signaled instead of // wasting CPU time polling for work. @@ -1666,7 +1669,7 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { Position pos(*sp->pos, this); memcpy(ss, sp->ss - 1, 4 * sizeof(Stack)); - (ss+1)->sp = sp; + (ss+1)->splitPoint = sp; sp->mutex.lock(); @@ -1711,6 +1714,17 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { // unsafe because if we are exiting there is a chance are already freed. sp->mutex.unlock(); } + + // If this thread is the master of a split point and all slaves have finished + // their work at this split point, return from the idle loop. + if (this_sp && !this_sp->slavesMask) + { + this_sp->mutex.lock(); + bool finished = !this_sp->slavesMask; // Retest under lock protection + this_sp->mutex.unlock(); + if (finished) + return; + } } }