X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=654efb3265f453caf9e8cfe398e04c625abc0b08;hp=b538897944ba7d174e17fdded262d8ddb719f0f4;hb=52bbf372bb4956595e730f4dba05ee6b78305ad0;hpb=69de6703539384b546dd38dda4da5dd33e84ec98 diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index b5388979..654efb32 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -574,31 +574,17 @@ namespace { // Step 5. Evaluate the position statically and update parent's gain statistics if (inCheck) ss->staticEval = ss->evalMargin = eval = VALUE_NONE; - - else if (tte) + else { - // Following asserts are valid only in single thread condition because - // TT access is always racy and its contents cannot be trusted. - assert(tte->static_value() != VALUE_NONE || Threads.size() > 1); - assert(ttValue != VALUE_NONE || tte->type() == BOUND_NONE || Threads.size() > 1); - - ss->staticEval = eval = tte->static_value(); - ss->evalMargin = tte->static_value_margin(); - - if (eval == VALUE_NONE || ss->evalMargin == VALUE_NONE) // Due to a race - eval = ss->staticEval = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin); + eval = ss->staticEval = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin); // Can ttValue be used as a better position evaluation? - if (ttValue != VALUE_NONE) + if (tte && ttValue != VALUE_NONE) + { if ( ((tte->type() & BOUND_LOWER) && ttValue > eval) || ((tte->type() & BOUND_UPPER) && ttValue < eval)) eval = ttValue; - } - else - { - eval = ss->staticEval = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin); - TT.store(posKey, VALUE_NONE, BOUND_NONE, DEPTH_NONE, MOVE_NONE, - ss->staticEval, ss->evalMargin); + } } // Update gain for the parent non-capture move given the static position @@ -1017,9 +1003,10 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // Step 19. Check for splitting the search if ( !SpNode && depth >= Threads.min_split_depth() - && bestValue < beta && Threads.available_slave_exists(thisThread)) { + assert(bestValue < beta); + bestValue = Threads.split(pos, ss, alpha, beta, bestValue, &bestMove, depth, threatMove, moveCount, mp, NT); if (bestValue >= beta) @@ -1051,8 +1038,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (bestValue >= beta) // Failed high { - TT.store(posKey, value_to_tt(bestValue, ss->ply), BOUND_LOWER, depth, - bestMove, ss->staticEval, ss->evalMargin); + TT.store(posKey, value_to_tt(bestValue, ss->ply), BOUND_LOWER, depth, bestMove); if (!pos.is_capture_or_promotion(bestMove) && !inCheck) { @@ -1077,7 +1063,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here else // Failed low or PV search TT.store(posKey, value_to_tt(bestValue, ss->ply), PvNode && bestMove != MOVE_NONE ? BOUND_EXACT : BOUND_UPPER, - depth, bestMove, ss->staticEval, ss->evalMargin); + depth, bestMove); assert(bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && bestValue < VALUE_INFINITE); @@ -1105,7 +1091,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here Key posKey; Move ttMove, move, bestMove; Value bestValue, value, ttValue, futilityValue, futilityBase, oldAlpha; - bool givesCheck, enoughMaterial, evasionPrunable; + bool givesCheck, enoughMaterial, evasionPrunable, fromNull; Depth ttDepth; // To flag BOUND_EXACT a node with eval above alpha and no available moves @@ -1114,6 +1100,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here ss->currentMove = bestMove = MOVE_NONE; ss->ply = (ss-1)->ply + 1; + fromNull = (ss-1)->currentMove == MOVE_NULL; // Check for an instant draw or maximum ply reached if (pos.is_draw() || ss->ply > MAX_PLY) @@ -1151,15 +1138,11 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here } else { - if (tte) + if (fromNull) { - assert(tte->static_value() != VALUE_NONE || Threads.size() > 1); - - ss->staticEval = bestValue = tte->static_value(); - ss->evalMargin = tte->static_value_margin(); - - if (ss->staticEval == VALUE_NONE || ss->evalMargin == VALUE_NONE) // Due to a race - ss->staticEval = bestValue = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin); + // Approximated score. Real one is slightly higher due to tempo + ss->staticEval = bestValue = -(ss-1)->staticEval; + ss->evalMargin = VALUE_ZERO; } else ss->staticEval = bestValue = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin); @@ -1168,8 +1151,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (bestValue >= beta) { if (!tte) - TT.store(pos.key(), value_to_tt(bestValue, ss->ply), BOUND_LOWER, - DEPTH_NONE, MOVE_NONE, ss->staticEval, ss->evalMargin); + TT.store(pos.key(), value_to_tt(bestValue, ss->ply), BOUND_LOWER, DEPTH_NONE, MOVE_NONE); return bestValue; } @@ -1198,6 +1180,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // Futility pruning if ( !PvNode && !InCheck + && !fromNull && !givesCheck && move != ttMove && enoughMaterial @@ -1277,9 +1260,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here } else // Fail high { - TT.store(posKey, value_to_tt(value, ss->ply), BOUND_LOWER, - ttDepth, move, ss->staticEval, ss->evalMargin); - + TT.store(posKey, value_to_tt(value, ss->ply), BOUND_LOWER, ttDepth, move); return value; } } @@ -1293,7 +1274,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here TT.store(posKey, value_to_tt(bestValue, ss->ply), PvNode && bestValue > oldAlpha ? BOUND_EXACT : BOUND_UPPER, - ttDepth, bestMove, ss->staticEval, ss->evalMargin); + ttDepth, bestMove); assert(bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && bestValue < VALUE_INFINITE); @@ -1584,20 +1565,12 @@ void RootMove::insert_pv_in_tt(Position& pos) { StateInfo state[MAX_PLY_PLUS_2], *st = state; TTEntry* tte; int ply = 0; - Value v, m; do { tte = TT.probe(pos.key()); if (!tte || tte->move() != pv[ply]) // Don't overwrite correct entries - { - if (pos.in_check()) - v = m = VALUE_NONE; - else - v = evaluate(pos, m); - - TT.store(pos.key(), VALUE_NONE, BOUND_NONE, DEPTH_NONE, pv[ply], v, m); - } + TT.store(pos.key(), VALUE_NONE, BOUND_NONE, DEPTH_NONE, pv[ply]); assert(pos.move_is_legal(pv[ply])); pos.do_move(pv[ply++], *st++);