X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=bda4c4c508afa206d38d8ab6d6862a5b7be02bdb;hp=b34d4ae7c108abfb2040a1dac2eb2da8bff632e1;hb=28543cddc647771658d5521398b725881a839c1c;hpb=41cc4eb953b2574ea8858c6d52f09fb1574179c8

diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp
index b34d4ae7..bda4c4c5 100644
--- a/src/search.cpp
+++ b/src/search.cpp
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ namespace {
     Key posKey;
     Move ttMove, move, excludedMove, bestMove;
     Depth extension, newDepth;
-    Value bestValue, value, ttValue, eval, maxValue;
+    Value bestValue, value, ttValue, eval, maxValue, pureStaticEval;
     bool ttHit, inCheck, givesCheck, improving;
     bool captureOrPromotion, doFullDepthSearch, moveCountPruning, skipQuiets, ttCapture, pvExact;
     Piece movedPiece;
@@ -584,7 +584,8 @@ namespace {
         if (   Threads.stop.load(std::memory_order_relaxed)
             || pos.is_draw(ss->ply)
             || ss->ply >= MAX_PLY)
-            return (ss->ply >= MAX_PLY && !inCheck) ? evaluate(pos) : VALUE_DRAW;
+            return (ss->ply >= MAX_PLY && !inCheck) ? evaluate(pos) - 10 * ((ss-1)->statScore > 0)
+                                                    : VALUE_DRAW;
 
         // Step 3. Mate distance pruning. Even if we mate at the next move our score
         // would be at best mate_in(ss->ply+1), but if alpha is already bigger because
@@ -704,15 +705,15 @@ namespace {
     // Step 6. Static evaluation of the position
     if (inCheck)
     {
-        ss->staticEval = eval = VALUE_NONE;
+        ss->staticEval = pureStaticEval = eval = VALUE_NONE;
         improving = false;
         goto moves_loop;  // Skip early pruning when in check
     }
     else if (ttHit)
     {
         // Never assume anything on values stored in TT
-        if ((ss->staticEval = eval = tte->eval()) == VALUE_NONE)
-            eval = ss->staticEval = evaluate(pos);
+        if ((ss->staticEval = pureStaticEval = eval = tte->eval()) == VALUE_NONE)
+            eval = ss->staticEval = (pureStaticEval = evaluate(pos)) - 10 * ((ss-1)->statScore > 0);
 
         // Can ttValue be used as a better position evaluation?
         if (    ttValue != VALUE_NONE
@@ -721,12 +722,14 @@ namespace {
     }
     else
     {
-        ss->staticEval = eval =
-        (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL ? evaluate(pos)
-                                         : -(ss-1)->staticEval + 2 * Eval::Tempo;
+        int p = (ss-1)->statScore;
+        int malus = p > 0 ? (p + 5000) / 1024 :
+                    p < 0 ? (p - 5000) / 1024 : 0;
 
-        tte->save(posKey, VALUE_NONE, BOUND_NONE, DEPTH_NONE, MOVE_NONE,
-                  ss->staticEval);
+        ss->staticEval = eval = (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL ? (pureStaticEval = evaluate(pos)) - malus
+                                                                 : (pureStaticEval = -(ss-1)->staticEval + 2 * Eval::Tempo);
+
+        tte->save(posKey, VALUE_NONE, BOUND_NONE, DEPTH_NONE, MOVE_NONE, pureStaticEval);
     }
 
     // Step 7. Razoring (~2 Elo)
@@ -1176,7 +1179,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
         tte->save(posKey, value_to_tt(bestValue, ss->ply),
                   bestValue >= beta ? BOUND_LOWER :
                   PvNode && bestMove ? BOUND_EXACT : BOUND_UPPER,
-                  depth, bestMove, ss->staticEval);
+                  depth, bestMove, pureStaticEval);
 
     assert(bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && bestValue < VALUE_INFINITE);