X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=fa592a859947e09e1f30fcefb8bd276ccccec16f;hp=cdbccb4c0abbc395f27465a33e6675ba133817d6;hb=f3b296c2e2061951d366edfbd5287f336e865553;hpb=a88a38c3a91749181ffa5d6dc0af7314a70a1c41 diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index cdbccb4c..fa592a85 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* Stockfish, a UCI chess playing engine derived from Glaurung 2.1 - Copyright (C) 2004-2020 The Stockfish developers (see AUTHORS file) + Copyright (C) 2004-2021 The Stockfish developers (see AUTHORS file) Stockfish is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ #include "uci.h" #include "syzygy/tbprobe.h" +namespace Stockfish { + namespace Search { LimitsType Limits; @@ -62,8 +64,7 @@ namespace { constexpr uint64_t TtHitAverageWindow = 4096; constexpr uint64_t TtHitAverageResolution = 1024; - // Razor and futility margins - constexpr int RazorMargin = 510; + // Futility margin Value futility_margin(Depth d, bool improving) { return Value(234 * (d - improving)); } @@ -82,10 +83,10 @@ namespace { // History and stats update bonus, based on depth int stat_bonus(Depth d) { - return d > 13 ? 29 : 17 * d * d + 134 * d - 134; + return d > 14 ? 66 : 6 * d * d + 231 * d - 206; } - // Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3fold-blindness + // Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3-fold blindness Value value_draw(Thread* thisThread) { return VALUE_DRAW + Value(2 * (thisThread->nodes & 1) - 1); } @@ -423,7 +424,7 @@ void Thread::search() { while (true) { Depth adjustedDepth = std::max(1, rootDepth - failedHighCnt - searchAgainCounter); - bestValue = ::search(rootPos, ss, alpha, beta, adjustedDepth, false); + bestValue = Stockfish::search(rootPos, ss, alpha, beta, adjustedDepth, false); // Bring the best move to the front. It is critical that sorting // is done with a stable algorithm because all the values but the @@ -617,6 +618,7 @@ namespace { moveCount = captureCount = quietCount = ss->moveCount = 0; bestValue = -VALUE_INFINITE; maxValue = VALUE_INFINITE; + ss->distanceFromPv = (PvNode ? 0 : ss->distanceFromPv); // Check for the available remaining time if (thisThread == Threads.main()) @@ -815,18 +817,13 @@ namespace { tte->save(posKey, VALUE_NONE, ss->ttPv, BOUND_NONE, DEPTH_NONE, MOVE_NONE, eval); } - if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 1 && is_ok((ss-1)->currentMove) && !(ss-1)->inCheck && !priorCapture && depth < 7) + // Use static evaluation difference to improve quiet move ordering + if (is_ok((ss-1)->currentMove) && !(ss-1)->inCheck && !priorCapture) { - int bonus = std::clamp(- (depth+1) * 2 * int((ss-1)->staticEval + ss->staticEval - 2 * Tempo), -1000, 1000); + int bonus = std::clamp(-depth * 4 * int((ss-1)->staticEval + ss->staticEval - 2 * Tempo), -1000, 1000); thisThread->mainHistory[~us][from_to((ss-1)->currentMove)] << bonus; } - // Step 7. Razoring (~1 Elo) - if ( !rootNode // The required rootNode PV handling is not available in qsearch - && depth == 1 - && eval <= alpha - RazorMargin) - return qsearch(pos, ss, alpha, beta); - // Set up improving flag that is used in various pruning heuristics // We define position as improving if static evaluation of position is better // Than the previous static evaluation at our turn @@ -835,20 +832,20 @@ namespace { ? ss->staticEval > (ss-4)->staticEval || (ss-4)->staticEval == VALUE_NONE : ss->staticEval > (ss-2)->staticEval; - // Step 8. Futility pruning: child node (~50 Elo) + // Step 7. Futility pruning: child node (~50 Elo) if ( !PvNode - && depth < 8 + && depth < 9 && eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) >= beta && eval < VALUE_KNOWN_WIN) // Do not return unproven wins return eval; - // Step 9. Null move search with verification search (~40 Elo) + // Step 8. Null move search with verification search (~40 Elo) if ( !PvNode && (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL - && (ss-1)->statScore < 22977 + && (ss-1)->statScore < 24185 && eval >= beta && eval >= ss->staticEval - && ss->staticEval >= beta - 30 * depth - 28 * improving + 84 * ss->ttPv + 168 + && ss->staticEval >= beta - 24 * depth - 34 * improving + 162 * ss->ttPv + 159 && !excludedMove && pos.non_pawn_material(us) && (ss->ply >= thisThread->nmpMinPly || us != thisThread->nmpColor)) @@ -856,7 +853,7 @@ namespace { assert(eval - beta >= 0); // Null move dynamic reduction based on depth and value - Depth R = (1015 + 85 * depth) / 256 + std::min(int(eval - beta) / 191, 3); + Depth R = (1062 + 68 * depth) / 256 + std::min(int(eval - beta) / 190, 3); ss->currentMove = MOVE_NULL; ss->continuationHistory = &thisThread->continuationHistory[0][0][NO_PIECE][0]; @@ -892,9 +889,9 @@ namespace { } } - probCutBeta = beta + 183 - 49 * improving; + probCutBeta = beta + 209 - 44 * improving; - // Step 10. ProbCut (~10 Elo) + // Step 9. ProbCut (~10 Elo) // If we have a good enough capture and a reduced search returns a value // much above beta, we can (almost) safely prune the previous move. if ( !PvNode @@ -967,7 +964,7 @@ namespace { ss->ttPv = ttPv; } - // Step 11. If the position is not in TT, decrease depth by 2 + // Step 10. If the position is not in TT, decrease depth by 2 if ( PvNode && depth >= 6 && !ttMove) @@ -975,6 +972,23 @@ namespace { moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here + ttCapture = ttMove && pos.capture_or_promotion(ttMove); + + // Step 11. A small Probcut idea, when we are in check + probCutBeta = beta + 400; + if ( ss->inCheck + && !PvNode + && depth >= 4 + && ttCapture + && (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER) + && tte->depth() >= depth - 3 + && ttValue >= probCutBeta + && abs(ttValue) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN + && abs(beta) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN + ) + return probCutBeta; + + const PieceToHistory* contHist[] = { (ss-1)->continuationHistory, (ss-2)->continuationHistory, nullptr , (ss-4)->continuationHistory, nullptr , (ss-6)->continuationHistory }; @@ -991,7 +1005,6 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here value = bestValue; singularQuietLMR = moveCountPruning = false; - ttCapture = ttMove && pos.capture_or_promotion(ttMove); // Mark this node as being searched ThreadHolding th(thisThread, posKey, ss->ply); @@ -1031,6 +1044,14 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here movedPiece = pos.moved_piece(move); givesCheck = pos.gives_check(move); + // Indicate PvNodes that will probably fail low if node was searched with non-PV search + // at depth equal or greater to current depth and result of this search was far below alpha + bool likelyFailLow = PvNode + && ttMove + && (tte->bound() & BOUND_UPPER) + && ttValue < alpha + 200 + 100 * depth + && tte->depth() >= depth; + // Calculate new depth for this move newDepth = depth - 1; @@ -1045,8 +1066,20 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here // Reduced depth of the next LMR search int lmrDepth = std::max(newDepth - reduction(improving, depth, moveCount), 0); - if ( !captureOrPromotion - && !givesCheck) + if ( captureOrPromotion + || givesCheck) + { + // Capture history based pruning when the move doesn't give check + if ( !givesCheck + && lmrDepth < 1 + && captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] < 0) + continue; + + // SEE based pruning + if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-218) * depth)) // (~25 Elo) + continue; + } + else { // Countermoves based pruning (~20 Elo) if ( lmrDepth < 4 + ((ss-1)->statScore > 0 || (ss-1)->moveCount == 1) @@ -1057,29 +1090,17 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here // Futility pruning: parent node (~5 Elo) if ( lmrDepth < 7 && !ss->inCheck - && ss->staticEval + 266 + 170 * lmrDepth <= alpha + && ss->staticEval + 174 + 157 * lmrDepth <= alpha && (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - + (*contHist[5])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] / 2 < 27376) + + (*contHist[5])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] / 3 < 28255) continue; // Prune moves with negative SEE (~20 Elo) if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-(30 - std::min(lmrDepth, 18)) * lmrDepth * lmrDepth))) continue; } - else - { - // Capture history based pruning when the move doesn't give check - if ( !givesCheck - && lmrDepth < 1 - && captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] < 0) - continue; - - // SEE based pruning - if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-213) * depth)) // (~25 Elo) - continue; - } } // Step 14. Extensions (~75 Elo) @@ -1133,7 +1154,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here // Check extension (~2 Elo) else if ( givesCheck - && (pos.is_discovery_check_on_king(~us, move) || pos.see_ge(move))) + && (pos.is_discovered_check_on_king(~us, move) || pos.see_ge(move))) extension = 1; // Last captures extension @@ -1141,12 +1162,6 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here && pos.non_pawn_material() <= 2 * RookValueMg) extension = 1; - // Late irreversible move extension - if ( move == ttMove - && pos.rule50_count() > 80 - && (captureOrPromotion || type_of(movedPiece) == PAWN)) - extension = 2; - // Add extension to new depth newDepth += extension; @@ -1163,14 +1178,19 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here // Step 15. Make the move pos.do_move(move, st, givesCheck); - // Step 16. Reduced depth search (LMR, ~200 Elo). If the move fails high it will be - // re-searched at full depth. + (ss+1)->distanceFromPv = ss->distanceFromPv + moveCount - 1; + + // Step 16. Late moves reduction / extension (LMR, ~200 Elo) + // We use various heuristics for the sons of a node after the first son has + // been searched. In general we would like to reduce them, but there are many + // cases where we extend a son if it has good chances to be "interesting". if ( depth >= 3 && moveCount > 1 + 2 * rootNode && ( !captureOrPromotion || moveCountPruning || ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] <= alpha || cutNode + || (!PvNode && !formerPv && captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.captured_piece())] < 3678) || thisThread->ttHitAverage < 432 * TtHitAverageResolution * TtHitAverageWindow / 1024)) { Depth r = reduction(improving, depth, moveCount); @@ -1183,8 +1203,9 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here if (th.marked()) r++; - // Decrease reduction if position is or has been on the PV (~10 Elo) - if (ss->ttPv) + // Decrease reduction if position is or has been on the PV + // and node is not likely to fail low. (~10 Elo) + if (ss->ttPv && !likelyFailLow) r -= 2; // Increase reduction at root and non-PV nodes when the best move does not change frequently @@ -1203,7 +1224,14 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here if (singularQuietLMR) r--; - if (!captureOrPromotion) + if (captureOrPromotion) + { + // Unless giving check, this capture is likely bad + if ( !givesCheck + && ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] + 210 * depth <= alpha) + r++; + } + else { // Increase reduction if ttMove is a capture (~5 Elo) if (ttCapture) @@ -1227,38 +1255,39 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here + (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - - 5287; + - 4741; // Decrease/increase reduction by comparing opponent's stat score (~10 Elo) - if (ss->statScore >= -105 && (ss-1)->statScore < -103) + if (ss->statScore >= -89 && (ss-1)->statScore < -116) r--; - else if ((ss-1)->statScore >= -122 && ss->statScore < -129) + else if ((ss-1)->statScore >= -112 && ss->statScore < -100) r++; // Decrease/increase reduction for moves with a good/bad history (~30 Elo) - r -= ss->statScore / 14884; - } - else - { - // Unless giving check, this capture is likely bad - if ( !givesCheck - && ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] + 210 * depth <= alpha) - r++; + // If we are not in check use statScore, but if we are in check we use + // the sum of main history and first continuation history with an offset. + if (ss->inCheck) + r -= (thisThread->mainHistory[us][from_to(move)] + + (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - 3833) / 16384; + else + r -= ss->statScore / 14790; } - Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth); + // In general we want to cap the LMR depth search at newDepth. But for nodes + // close to the principal variation the cap is at (newDepth + 1), which will + // allow these nodes to be searched deeper than the pv (up to 4 plies deeper). + Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth + ((ss+1)->distanceFromPv <= 4)); value = -search(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, d, true); - doFullDepthSearch = value > alpha && d != newDepth; - + // If the son is reduced and fails high it will be re-searched at full depth + doFullDepthSearch = value > alpha && d < newDepth; didLMR = true; } else { doFullDepthSearch = !PvNode || moveCount > 1; - didLMR = false; } @@ -1546,15 +1575,13 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here moveCount++; - // Futility pruning + // Futility pruning and moveCount pruning if ( bestValue > VALUE_TB_LOSS_IN_MAX_PLY && !givesCheck && futilityBase > -VALUE_KNOWN_WIN && !pos.advanced_pawn_push(move)) { - assert(type_of(move) != ENPASSANT); // Due to !pos.advanced_pawn_push - // moveCount pruning if (moveCount > 2) continue; @@ -1716,8 +1743,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here PieceType captured = type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(bestMove))); bonus1 = stat_bonus(depth + 1); - bonus2 = bestValue > beta + PawnValueMg ? bonus1 // larger bonus - : stat_bonus(depth); // smaller bonus + bonus2 = bestValue > beta + PawnValueMg ? bonus1 // larger bonus + : std::min(bonus1, stat_bonus(depth)); // smaller bonus if (!pos.capture_or_promotion(bestMove)) { @@ -2007,3 +2034,5 @@ void Tablebases::rank_root_moves(Position& pos, Search::RootMoves& rootMoves) { m.tbRank = 0; } } + +} // namespace Stockfish