X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=fc3ecae4d87e5c56230aec04a8bb6aacbee50cc0;hp=ec457609fedb9b2997c7f88c8a420c20941e88c9;hb=db322e6a63459bc3dfdf7fd537d42234b854fb76;hpb=f69c185e02b4ab33d19cea6e143ad0beac05c7c7 diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index ec457609..fc3ecae4 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* Stockfish, a UCI chess playing engine derived from Glaurung 2.1 Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tord Romstad (Glaurung author) - Copyright (C) 2008-2012 Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski, Tord Romstad + Copyright (C) 2008-2013 Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski, Tord Romstad Stockfish is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ void Search::think() { static PolyglotBook book; // Defined static to initialize the PRNG only once RootColor = RootPos.side_to_move(); - TimeMgr.init(Limits, RootPos.startpos_ply_counter(), RootColor); + TimeMgr.init(Limits, RootPos.game_ply(), RootColor); if (RootMoves.empty()) { @@ -293,7 +293,6 @@ namespace { Stack ss[MAX_PLY_PLUS_2]; int depth, prevBestMoveChanges; Value bestValue, alpha, beta, delta; - bool bestMoveNeverChanged = true; memset(ss, 0, 4 * sizeof(Stack)); depth = BestMoveChanges = 0; @@ -354,7 +353,7 @@ namespace { // we want to keep the same order for all the moves but the new // PV that goes to the front. Note that in case of MultiPV search // the already searched PV lines are preserved. - sort(RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx, RootMoves.end()); + std::stable_sort(RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx, RootMoves.end()); // Write PV back to transposition table in case the relevant // entries have been overwritten during the search. @@ -399,7 +398,7 @@ namespace { } // Sort the PV lines searched so far and update the GUI - sort(RootMoves.begin(), RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx + 1); + std::stable_sort(RootMoves.begin(), RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx + 1); if (PVIdx + 1 == PVSize || Time::now() - SearchTime > 3000) sync_cout << uci_pv(pos, depth, alpha, beta) << sync_endl; @@ -416,10 +415,6 @@ namespace { << std::endl; } - // Filter out startup noise when monitoring best move stability - if (depth > 2 && BestMoveChanges) - bestMoveNeverChanged = false; - // Do we have found a "mate in x"? if ( Limits.mate && bestValue >= VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY @@ -445,8 +440,8 @@ namespace { if ( depth >= 12 && !stop && PVSize == 1 - && ( (bestMoveNeverChanged && pos.captured_piece_type()) - || Time::now() - SearchTime > (TimeMgr.available_time() * 40) / 100)) + && ( RootMoves.size() == 1 + || Time::now() - SearchTime > (TimeMgr.available_time() * 20) / 100)) { Value rBeta = bestValue - 2 * PawnValueMg; (ss+1)->excludedMove = RootMoves[0].pv[0]; @@ -494,7 +489,7 @@ namespace { Move movesSearched[64]; StateInfo st; const TTEntry *tte; - SplitPoint* sp; + SplitPoint* splitPoint; Key posKey; Move ttMove, move, excludedMove, bestMove, threatMove; Depth ext, newDepth; @@ -511,15 +506,15 @@ namespace { if (SpNode) { - sp = ss->sp; - bestMove = sp->bestMove; - threatMove = sp->threatMove; - bestValue = sp->bestValue; + splitPoint = ss->splitPoint; + bestMove = splitPoint->bestMove; + threatMove = splitPoint->threatMove; + bestValue = splitPoint->bestValue; tte = NULL; ttMove = excludedMove = MOVE_NONE; ttValue = VALUE_NONE; - assert(sp->bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && sp->moveCount > 0); + assert(splitPoint->bestValue > -VALUE_INFINITE && splitPoint->moveCount > 0); goto split_point_start; } @@ -594,8 +589,8 @@ namespace { else if (tte) { // Never assume anything on values stored in TT - if ( (ss->staticEval = eval = tte->static_value()) == VALUE_NONE - ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->static_value_margin()) == VALUE_NONE) + if ( (ss->staticEval = eval = tte->eval_value()) == VALUE_NONE + ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->eval_margin()) == VALUE_NONE) eval = ss->staticEval = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin); // Can ttValue be used as a better position evaluation? @@ -794,8 +789,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (!pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, ci.pinned)) continue; - moveCount = ++sp->moveCount; - sp->mutex.unlock(); + moveCount = ++splitPoint->moveCount; + splitPoint->mutex.unlock(); } else moveCount++; @@ -857,21 +852,19 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here newDepth = depth - ONE_PLY + ext; // Step 13. Futility pruning (is omitted in PV nodes) - if ( !PvNode - && !captureOrPromotion + if ( !captureOrPromotion && !inCheck && !dangerous - && move != ttMove - && (bestValue > VALUE_MATED_IN_MAX_PLY || ( bestValue == -VALUE_INFINITE - && alpha > VALUE_MATED_IN_MAX_PLY))) + && move != ttMove) { // Move count based pruning - if ( depth < 16 * ONE_PLY + if ( !PvNode + && depth < 16 * ONE_PLY && moveCount >= FutilityMoveCounts[depth] && (!threatMove || !refutes(pos, move, threatMove))) { if (SpNode) - sp->mutex.lock(); + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); continue; } @@ -883,10 +876,10 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here futilityValue = ss->staticEval + ss->evalMargin + futility_margin(predictedDepth, moveCount) + Gain[pos.piece_moved(move)][to_sq(move)]; - if (futilityValue < beta) + if (!PvNode && futilityValue < beta) { if (SpNode) - sp->mutex.lock(); + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); continue; } @@ -896,7 +889,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here && pos.see_sign(move) < 0) { if (SpNode) - sp->mutex.lock(); + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); continue; } @@ -929,7 +922,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here { ss->reduction = reduction(depth, moveCount); Depth d = std::max(newDepth - ss->reduction, ONE_PLY); - alpha = SpNode ? sp->alpha : alpha; + if (SpNode) + alpha = splitPoint->alpha; value = -search(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, d); @@ -942,7 +936,9 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // Step 16. Full depth search, when LMR is skipped or fails high if (doFullDepthSearch) { - alpha = SpNode ? sp->alpha : alpha; + if (SpNode) + alpha = splitPoint->alpha; + value = newDepth < ONE_PLY ? givesCheck ? -qsearch(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, DEPTH_ZERO) : -qsearch(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, DEPTH_ZERO) @@ -965,9 +961,9 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // Step 18. Check for new best move if (SpNode) { - sp->mutex.lock(); - bestValue = sp->bestValue; - alpha = sp->alpha; + splitPoint->mutex.lock(); + bestValue = splitPoint->bestValue; + alpha = splitPoint->alpha; } // Finished searching the move. If Signals.stop is true, the search @@ -1002,20 +998,20 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (value > bestValue) { - bestValue = SpNode ? sp->bestValue = value : value; + bestValue = SpNode ? splitPoint->bestValue = value : value; if (value > alpha) { - bestMove = SpNode ? sp->bestMove = move : move; + bestMove = SpNode ? splitPoint->bestMove = move : move; if (PvNode && value < beta) // Update alpha! Always alpha < beta - alpha = SpNode ? sp->alpha = value : value; + alpha = SpNode ? splitPoint->alpha = value : value; else { assert(value >= beta); // Fail high if (SpNode) - sp->cutoff = true; + splitPoint->cutoff = true; break; } @@ -1025,7 +1021,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here // Step 19. Check for splitting the search if ( !SpNode && depth >= Threads.minimumSplitDepth - && Threads.slave_available(thisThread) + && Threads.available_slave(thisThread) && thisThread->splitPointsSize < MAX_SPLITPOINTS_PER_THREAD) { assert(bestValue < beta); @@ -1164,8 +1160,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here if (tte) { // Never assume anything on values stored in TT - if ( (ss->staticEval = bestValue = tte->static_value()) == VALUE_NONE - ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->static_value_margin()) == VALUE_NONE) + if ( (ss->staticEval = bestValue = tte->eval_value()) == VALUE_NONE + ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->eval_margin()) == VALUE_NONE) ss->staticEval = bestValue = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin); } else @@ -1614,13 +1610,11 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { // Pointer 'this_sp' is not null only if we are called from split(), and not // at the thread creation. So it means we are the split point's master. - const SplitPoint* this_sp = splitPointsSize ? activeSplitPoint : NULL; + SplitPoint* this_sp = splitPointsSize ? activeSplitPoint : NULL; assert(!this_sp || (this_sp->masterThread == this && searching)); - // If this thread is the master of a split point and all slaves have finished - // their work at this split point, return from the idle loop. - while (!this_sp || this_sp->slavesMask) + while (true) { // If we are not searching, wait for a condition to be signaled instead of // wasting CPU time polling for work. @@ -1668,13 +1662,13 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { Position pos(*sp->pos, this); memcpy(ss, sp->ss - 1, 4 * sizeof(Stack)); - (ss+1)->sp = sp; + (ss+1)->splitPoint = sp; sp->mutex.lock(); - assert(sp->slavesPositions[idx] == NULL); + assert(activePosition == NULL); - sp->slavesPositions[idx] = &pos; + activePosition = &pos; switch (sp->nodeType) { case Root: @@ -1693,7 +1687,7 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { assert(searching); searching = false; - sp->slavesPositions[idx] = NULL; + activePosition = NULL; sp->slavesMask &= ~(1ULL << idx); sp->nodes += pos.nodes_searched(); @@ -1713,6 +1707,17 @@ void Thread::idle_loop() { // unsafe because if we are exiting there is a chance are already freed. sp->mutex.unlock(); } + + // If this thread is the master of a split point and all slaves have finished + // their work at this split point, return from the idle loop. + if (this_sp && !this_sp->slavesMask) + { + this_sp->mutex.lock(); + bool finished = !this_sp->slavesMask; // Retest under lock protection + this_sp->mutex.unlock(); + if (finished) + return; + } } } @@ -1742,7 +1747,7 @@ void check_time() { nodes = RootPos.nodes_searched(); // Loop across all split points and sum accumulated SplitPoint nodes plus - // all the currently active slaves positions. + // all the currently active positions nodes. for (size_t i = 0; i < Threads.size(); i++) for (int j = 0; j < Threads[i]->splitPointsSize; j++) { @@ -1754,8 +1759,9 @@ void check_time() { Bitboard sm = sp.slavesMask; while (sm) { - Position* pos = sp.slavesPositions[pop_lsb(&sm)]; - nodes += pos ? pos->nodes_searched() : 0; + Position* pos = Threads[pop_lsb(&sm)]->activePosition; + if (pos) + nodes += pos->nodes_searched(); } sp.mutex.unlock();