X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=fef1b518160abf00e7e6e4ac14a7e656d2ed4046;hp=5306bb9a0084b2ee50ae7b4fc83cbd7324ba2bd0;hb=d558f8a673b56b32ab6da8050f41b9e02fe1758b;hpb=785b70809783430ff1e0bf856dac3b9bfa6fe826

diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp
index 5306bb9a..fef1b518 100644
--- a/src/search.cpp
+++ b/src/search.cpp
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ namespace {
 void Search::init() {
 
   for (int i = 1; i < MAX_MOVES; ++i)
-      Reductions[i] = int(21.3 * std::log(i + 0.25 * std::log(i)));
+      Reductions[i] = int(21.9 * std::log(i));
 }
 
 
@@ -312,19 +312,7 @@ void Thread::search() {
   multiPV = std::min(multiPV, rootMoves.size());
   ttHitAverage = TtHitAverageWindow * TtHitAverageResolution / 2;
 
-  int ct = int(Options["Contempt"]) * PawnValueEg / 100; // From centipawns
-
-  // In analysis mode, adjust contempt in accordance with user preference
-  if (Limits.infinite || Options["UCI_AnalyseMode"])
-      ct =  Options["Analysis Contempt"] == "Off"  ? 0
-          : Options["Analysis Contempt"] == "Both" ? ct
-          : Options["Analysis Contempt"] == "White" && us == BLACK ? -ct
-          : Options["Analysis Contempt"] == "Black" && us == WHITE ? -ct
-          : ct;
-
-  // Evaluation score is from the white point of view
-  contempt = (us == WHITE ?  make_score(ct, ct / 2)
-                          : -make_score(ct, ct / 2));
+  trend = SCORE_ZERO;
 
   int searchAgainCounter = 0;
 
@@ -370,11 +358,11 @@ void Thread::search() {
               alpha = std::max(prev - delta,-VALUE_INFINITE);
               beta  = std::min(prev + delta, VALUE_INFINITE);
 
-              // Adjust contempt based on root move's previousScore (dynamic contempt)
-              int dct = ct + (113 - ct / 2) * prev / (abs(prev) + 147);
+              // Adjust trend based on root move's previousScore (dynamic contempt)
+              int tr = 113 * prev / (abs(prev) + 147);
 
-              contempt = (us == WHITE ?  make_score(dct, dct / 2)
-                                      : -make_score(dct, dct / 2));
+              trend = (us == WHITE ?  make_score(tr, tr / 2)
+                                   : -make_score(tr, tr / 2));
           }
 
           // Start with a small aspiration window and, in the case of a fail
@@ -610,10 +598,11 @@ namespace {
 
     assert(0 <= ss->ply && ss->ply < MAX_PLY);
 
-    (ss+1)->ttPv = false;
+    (ss+1)->ttPv         = false;
     (ss+1)->excludedMove = bestMove = MOVE_NONE;
-    (ss+2)->killers[0] = (ss+2)->killers[1] = MOVE_NONE;
-    Square prevSq = to_sq((ss-1)->currentMove);
+    (ss+2)->killers[0]   = (ss+2)->killers[1] = MOVE_NONE;
+    ss->doubleExtensions = (ss-1)->doubleExtensions;
+    Square prevSq        = to_sq((ss-1)->currentMove);
 
     // Initialize statScore to zero for the grandchildren of the current position.
     // So statScore is shared between all grandchildren and only the first grandchild
@@ -771,6 +760,7 @@ namespace {
             ss->staticEval = eval = -(ss-1)->staticEval;
 
         // Save static evaluation into transposition table
+        if(!excludedMove)
         tte->save(posKey, VALUE_NONE, ss->ttPv, BOUND_NONE, DEPTH_NONE, MOVE_NONE, eval);
     }
 
@@ -791,7 +781,6 @@ namespace {
 
     // Step 7. Futility pruning: child node (~50 Elo)
     if (   !PvNode
-        &&  depth < 9
         &&  eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) >= beta
         &&  eval < VALUE_KNOWN_WIN) // Do not return unproven wins
         return eval;
@@ -953,6 +942,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
 
     value = bestValue;
     singularQuietLMR = moveCountPruning = false;
+    bool doubleExtension = false;
 
     // Indicate PvNodes that will probably fail low if the node was searched
     // at a depth equal or greater than the current depth, and the result of this search was a fail low.
@@ -1032,8 +1022,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
                   continue;
 
               // Futility pruning: parent node (~5 Elo)
-              if (   lmrDepth < 7
-                  && !ss->inCheck
+              if (   !ss->inCheck
                   && ss->staticEval + 174 + 157 * lmrDepth <= alpha
                   &&  (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
                     + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
@@ -1074,8 +1063,15 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
           {
               extension = 1;
               singularQuietLMR = !ttCapture;
-              if (!PvNode && value < singularBeta - 93)
+
+              // Avoid search explosion by limiting the number of double extensions to at most 3
+              if (   !PvNode
+                  && value < singularBeta - 93
+                  && ss->doubleExtensions < 3)
+              {
                   extension = 2;
+                  doubleExtension = true;
+              }
           }
 
           // Multi-cut pruning
@@ -1105,6 +1101,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
 
       // Add extension to new depth
       newDepth += extension;
+      ss->doubleExtensions = (ss-1)->doubleExtensions + (extension == 2);
 
       // Speculative prefetch as early as possible
       prefetch(TT.first_entry(pos.key_after(move)));
@@ -1147,7 +1144,6 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
 
           // Increase reduction at root and non-PV nodes when the best move does not change frequently
           if (   (rootNode || !PvNode)
-              && thisThread->rootDepth > 10
               && thisThread->bestMoveChanges <= 2)
               r++;
 
@@ -1160,8 +1156,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
               r--;
 
           // Increase reduction for cut nodes (~3 Elo)
-          if (cutNode)
-              r += 1 + !captureOrPromotion;
+          if (cutNode && move != ss->killers[0])
+              r += 2;
 
           if (!captureOrPromotion)
           {
@@ -1182,8 +1178,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
 
           // In general we want to cap the LMR depth search at newDepth. But if
           // reductions are really negative and movecount is low, we allow this move
-          // to be searched deeper than the first move.
-          Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth + (r < -1 && moveCount <= 5));
+          // to be searched deeper than the first move, unless ttMove was extended by 2.
+          Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth + (r < -1 && moveCount <= 5 && !doubleExtension));
 
           value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, d, true);