X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fucioption.cpp;h=fe98457546ec1e39df58a38b066d77992d97b04a;hp=3ee823e57d38cb7d9bfe9af2736b7e352696c6bf;hb=8008f784150d040497ac8bd5a5153d90ea0dbde6;hpb=5c8f571459fd4812543ead27d3644dcf46a5682d

diff --git a/src/ucioption.cpp b/src/ucioption.cpp
index 3ee823e5..fe984575 100644
--- a/src/ucioption.cpp
+++ b/src/ucioption.cpp
@@ -116,8 +116,6 @@ namespace {
     o["Passed Pawn Extension (non-PV nodes)"] = Option(0, 0, 2);
     o["Pawn Endgame Extension (PV nodes)"] = Option(2, 0, 2);
     o["Pawn Endgame Extension (non-PV nodes)"] = Option(2, 0, 2);
-    o["Full Depth Moves (PV nodes)"] = Option(10, 1, 100);
-    o["Full Depth Moves (non-PV nodes)"] = Option(3, 1, 100);
     o["Threat Depth"] = Option(5, 0, 100);
     o["Randomness"] = Option(0, 0, 10);
     o["Minimum Split Depth"] = Option(4, 4, 7);
@@ -196,15 +194,18 @@ void init_uci_options() {
 
   load_defaults(options);
 
-  // Limit the default value of "Threads" to 7 even if we have 8 CPU cores.
-  // According to Ken Dail's tests, Glaurung plays much better with 7 than
-  // with 8 threads.  This is weird, but it is probably difficult to find out
-  // why before I have a 8-core computer to experiment with myself.
+  // Set optimal value for parameter "Minimum Split Depth"
+  // according to number of available cores.
   assert(options.find("Threads") != options.end());
   assert(options.find("Minimum Split Depth") != options.end());
 
-  options["Threads"].defaultValue = stringify(Min(cpu_count(), 7));
-  options["Threads"].currentValue = stringify(Min(cpu_count(), 7));
+  Option& thr = options["Threads"];
+  Option& msd = options["Minimum Split Depth"];
+
+  thr.defaultValue = thr.currentValue = stringify(cpu_count());
+
+  if (cpu_count() >= 8)
+      msd.defaultValue = msd.currentValue = stringify(7);
 }
 
 
@@ -292,10 +293,28 @@ void set_option_value(const string& name, const string& value) {
   else if (v == "false")
       v = "0";
 
-  if (options.find(name) != options.end())
-      options[name].currentValue = v;
-  else
+  if (options.find(name) == options.end())
+  {
       std::cout << "No such option: " << name << std::endl;
+      return;
+  }
+
+  // Normally it's up to the GUI to check for option's limits,
+  // but we could receive the new value directly from the user
+  // by teminal window. So let's check the bounds anyway.
+  Option& opt = options[name];
+
+  if (opt.type == CHECK && v != "0" && v != "1")
+      return;
+
+  else if (opt.type == SPIN)
+  {
+      int val = atoi(v.c_str());
+      if (val < opt.minValue || val > opt.maxValue)
+          return;
+  }
+
+  opt.currentValue = v;
 }