Use move not ttMove in exclude search

If we arrive until the exclusion search call then
we know that move == ttMove == tte->move()

But using ttMove in search call while, during excluded search
conditions we have used tte->Move()could be a little bit suboptimal.
On the other side using tte->move() also in search call is a bit ugly
so opt for the third choice that is the most clean becasue from the
conditions the reader easily understands that we are talking of ttMove
and that we ant to exclude the move we are evaluating in that moment.

Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>

diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp
index 7ffdadcf9c96d8e82e4665fb02b2fa8232f23fa6..8f85e124aa8617b5b05de8903eb343598ee3aad3 100644 (file)
--- a/src/search.cpp
+++ b/src/search.cpp
@@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ namespace {
 
           if (abs(ttValue) < VALUE_KNOWN_WIN)
           {
-              Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, ttMove);
+              Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, move);
 
               // If search result is well below the foreseen score of the ttMove then we
               // assume ttMove is the only one realistically playable and we extend it.
@@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ namespace {
 
           if (abs(ttValue) < VALUE_KNOWN_WIN)
           {
-              Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, ttMove);
+              Value excValue = search(pos, ss, ttValue - SingleReplyMargin, depth / 2, ply, false, threadID, move);
 
               // If search result is well below the foreseen score of the ttMove then we
               // assume ttMove is the only one realistically playable and we extend it.