From: Marco Costalba Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:11:52 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Small optimization in generate_evasions() X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=commitdiff_plain;h=4573d618e44056006683401cb3cc7b09a11f2bca Small optimization in generate_evasions() Find squares attacked by slider checkers, we will remove them from king evasions set so to avoid a couple of cycles in the slow king evasions legality check loop. Not a biggie, but now generate_evasions() is faster then generate_non_captures(), before was slower. Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba --- diff --git a/src/movegen.cpp b/src/movegen.cpp index 5917c9e4..198a36c5 100644 --- a/src/movegen.cpp +++ b/src/movegen.cpp @@ -249,34 +249,51 @@ int generate_evasions(const Position& pos, MoveStack* mlist) { assert(pos.piece_on(ksq) == king_of_color(us)); - // Generate evasions for king - Bitboard b1 = pos.piece_attacks(ksq) & ~pos.pieces_of_color(us); + // The bitboard of occupied pieces without our king Bitboard b2 = pos.occupied_squares(); clear_bit(&b2, ksq); + // Find squares attacked by slider checkers, we will + // remove them from king evasions set so to avoid a couple + // of cycles in the slow king evasions legality check loop. + Bitboard checkers = pos.checkers(); + Bitboard checkersAttacks = EmptyBoardBB; + Bitboard b = checkers & (pos.queens() | pos.bishops()); + while (b) + { + from = pop_1st_bit(&b); + checkersAttacks |= bishop_attacks_bb(from, b2); + } + + b = checkers & (pos.queens() | pos.rooks()); + while (b) + { + from = pop_1st_bit(&b); + checkersAttacks |= rook_attacks_bb(from, b2); + } + + // Generate evasions for king + Bitboard b1 = pos.piece_attacks(ksq) & ~pos.pieces_of_color(us) & ~checkersAttacks; while (b1) { - to = pop_1st_bit(&b1); - - // Make sure 'to' is not attacked by the other side. This is a bit ugly, - // because we can't use Position::square_is_attacked. Instead we use - // the low-level bishop_attacks_bb and rook_attacks_bb with the bitboard - // b2 (the occupied squares with the king removed) in order to test whether - // the king will remain in check on the destination square. - if (!( (pos.piece_attacks(to) & pos.knights(them)) - || (pos.pawn_attacks(us, to) & pos.pawns(them)) - || (bishop_attacks_bb(to, b2) & pos.bishops_and_queens(them)) - || (rook_attacks_bb(to, b2) & pos.rooks_and_queens(them)) - || (pos.piece_attacks(to) & pos.kings(them)))) - - (*mlist++).move = make_move(ksq, to); + to = pop_1st_bit(&b1); + + // Make sure 'to' is not attacked by the other side. This is a bit ugly, + // because we can't use Position::square_is_attacked. Instead we use + // the low-level bishop_attacks_bb and rook_attacks_bb with the bitboard + // b2 (the occupied squares with the king removed) in order to test whether + // the king will remain in check on the destination square. + if (!( (pos.piece_attacks(to) & pos.knights(them)) + || (pos.pawn_attacks(us, to) & pos.pawns(them)) + || (bishop_attacks_bb(to, b2) & pos.bishops_and_queens(them)) + || (rook_attacks_bb(to, b2) & pos.rooks_and_queens(them)) + || (pos.piece_attacks(to) & pos.kings(them)))) + (*mlist++).move = make_move(ksq, to); } // Generate evasions for other pieces only if not double check. We use a // simple bit twiddling hack here rather than calling count_1s in order to // save some time (we know that pos.checkers() has at most two nonzero bits). - Bitboard checkers = pos.checkers(); - if (!(checkers & (checkers - 1))) // Only one bit set? { Square checksq = first_1(checkers);