From: mstembera Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:33:53 +0000 (+0800) Subject: Tuned version of TT replacement policy X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=commitdiff_plain;h=51330414c4a773a9c3d1dd562fdc8536344a67b8 Tuned version of TT replacement policy If the used multiplier of 8 was any number larger than DEPTH_MAX this would be a non functional patch. STC 2MB LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50] Total: 16353 W: 3216 L: 3066 D: 10071 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/55a6d0630ebc590abbe1babd LTC 8MB LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00] Total: 134618 W: 21276 L: 20716 D: 92626 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/55a74d760ebc590abbe1bad6 STC 16MB LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-4.00,0.00] Total: 22549 W: 4257 L: 4178 D: 14114 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/55a9a2f90ebc590abbe1bb16 Bench: 7372460 Resolves #380 --- diff --git a/src/tt.cpp b/src/tt.cpp index c94dae53..5ebd10d2 100644 --- a/src/tt.cpp +++ b/src/tt.cpp @@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ void TranspositionTable::clear() { /// TranspositionTable::probe() looks up the current position in the transposition /// table. It returns true and a pointer to the TTEntry if the position is found. /// Otherwise, it returns false and a pointer to an empty or least valuable TTEntry -/// to be replaced later. A TTEntry t1 is considered to be more valuable than a -/// TTEntry t2 if t1 is from the current search and t2 is from a previous search, -/// or if the depth of t1 is bigger than the depth of t2. +/// to be replaced later. TTEntry t1 is considered more valuable than TTEntry t2 if +/// both are from the current search and the depth of t1 is greater than the depth of t2, +/// or if t1 is from a previous search but its depth is at least 8 ply deeper than t2. TTEntry* TranspositionTable::probe(const Key key, bool& found) const { @@ -87,9 +87,8 @@ TTEntry* TranspositionTable::probe(const Key key, bool& found) const { // Find an entry to be replaced according to the replacement strategy TTEntry* replace = tte; for (int i = 1; i < ClusterSize; ++i) - if ( (( tte[i].genBound8 & 0xFC) == generation8) - - ((replace->genBound8 & 0xFC) == generation8) - - (tte[i].depth8 < replace->depth8) < 0) + if ( (( tte[i].genBound8 & 0xFC) == generation8) * 8 * ONE_PLY + tte[i].depth8 + < ((replace->genBound8 & 0xFC) == generation8) * 8 * ONE_PLY + replace->depth8) replace = &tte[i]; return found = false, replace;