From: Marco Costalba Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:42:55 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Movepicker: take move's loop out of switch statement X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?p=stockfish;a=commitdiff_plain;h=607ac0687a53c764ad548932d35e651c540f4764 Movepicker: take move's loop out of switch statement This not only cleans up the code but gives another speed boost of 1.8% From revision 595a90dfd0 we have increased pgo compiled binary speed of a whopping +5.2% without any functional change !! This is really awsome considering that we have also cut line count by 25 lines. Sometime we spend days for getting an extra 1% from move generation while instead the biggest optimizations come from anonymous and apparently dull parts of the code. Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba --- diff --git a/src/movepick.cpp b/src/movepick.cpp index 6b7483eb..7120ba0c 100644 --- a/src/movepick.cpp +++ b/src/movepick.cpp @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ void MovePicker::go_next_phase() { return; case PH_STOP: + lastMove = curMove + 1; // hack to be friendly for get_next_move() return; default: @@ -247,24 +248,23 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() { assert(!pos.is_check() || *phasePtr == PH_EVASIONS || *phasePtr == PH_STOP); assert( pos.is_check() || *phasePtr != PH_EVASIONS); + Move move; + while (true) { - switch (phase) { + while (curMove != lastMove) + { + move = (curMove++)->move; + + switch (phase) { - case PH_TT_MOVES: - while (curMove != lastMove) - { - Move move = (curMove++)->move; + case PH_TT_MOVES: if ( move != MOVE_NONE && move_is_legal(pos, move, pinned)) return move; - } - break; + break; - case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: - while (curMove != lastMove) - { - Move move = (curMove++)->move; + case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES: if ( move != ttMoves[0].move && move != ttMoves[1].move && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) @@ -280,59 +280,45 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() { badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures].move = move; badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures++].score = seeValue; } - } - break; + break; - case PH_KILLERS: - while (curMove != lastMove) - { - Move move = (curMove++)->move; + case PH_KILLERS: if ( move != MOVE_NONE && move != ttMoves[0].move && move != ttMoves[1].move && move_is_legal(pos, move, pinned) && !pos.move_is_capture(move)) return move; - } - break; + break; - case PH_NONCAPTURES: - while (curMove != lastMove) - { - Move move = (curMove++)->move; + case PH_NONCAPTURES: if ( move != ttMoves[0].move && move != ttMoves[1].move && move != killers[0].move && move != killers[1].move && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) return move; - } - break; - - case PH_EVASIONS: - case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: - if (curMove != lastMove) - return (curMove++)->move; - break; - - case PH_QCAPTURES: - case PH_QCHECKS: - while (curMove != lastMove) - { - Move move = (curMove++)->move; + break; + + case PH_EVASIONS: + case PH_BAD_CAPTURES: + return move; + + case PH_QCAPTURES: + case PH_QCHECKS: // Maybe postpone the legality check until after futility pruning? if ( move != ttMoves[0].move && pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned)) return move; - } - break; + break; - case PH_STOP: - return MOVE_NONE; + case PH_STOP: + return MOVE_NONE; - default: - assert(false); - break; + default: + assert(false); + break; + } } go_next_phase(); }