From 4064ee540649cb46ad4cc4a6080bd4ef41314cb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marco Costalba Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 01:45:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Simplify captures ordering A big simplification and removing of useless code. Finished at 50% both at short TC (with SPRT) than at long TC at fixed number of games: ELO: -0.14 +-3.4 (95%) LOS: 46.8% Total: 15206 W: 2836 L: 2842 D: 9528 bench: 5059948 --- src/movepick.cpp | 19 +++---------------- src/movepick.h | 2 +- src/search.cpp | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/movepick.cpp b/src/movepick.cpp index 8445260b..4f2fa01e 100644 --- a/src/movepick.cpp +++ b/src/movepick.cpp @@ -70,12 +70,11 @@ namespace { /// search captures, promotions and some checks) and about how important good /// move ordering is at the current node. -MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, Depth d, const HistoryStats& h, Move* cm, - Search::Stack* s, Value beta) : pos(p), history(h), depth(d) { +MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, Depth d, const HistoryStats& h, + Move* cm, Search::Stack* s) : pos(p), history(h), depth(d) { assert(d > DEPTH_ZERO); - captureThreshold = 0; cur = end = moves; endBadCaptures = moves + MAX_MOVES - 1; countermoves = cm; @@ -85,18 +84,8 @@ MovePicker::MovePicker(const Position& p, Move ttm, Depth d, const HistoryStats& stage = EVASION; else - { stage = MAIN_SEARCH; - // Consider sligtly negative captures as good if at low depth and far from beta - if (ss->staticEval < beta - PawnValueMg && d < 3 * ONE_PLY) - captureThreshold = -PawnValueMg; - - // Consider negative captures as good if still enough to reach beta - else if (ss->staticEval > beta) - captureThreshold = beta - ss->staticEval; - } - ttMove = (ttm && pos.is_pseudo_legal(ttm) ? ttm : MOVE_NONE); end += (ttMove != MOVE_NONE); } @@ -317,9 +306,7 @@ Move MovePicker::next_move() { move = pick_best(cur++, end)->move; if (move != ttMove) { - assert(captureThreshold <= 0); // Otherwise we cannot use see_sign() - - if (pos.see_sign(move) >= captureThreshold) + if (pos.see_sign(move) >= 0) return move; // Losing capture, move it to the tail of the array diff --git a/src/movepick.h b/src/movepick.h index 363b1a1b..572025f2 100644 --- a/src/movepick.h +++ b/src/movepick.h @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class MovePicker { public: MovePicker(const Position&, Move, Depth, const HistoryStats&, Square); MovePicker(const Position&, Move, const HistoryStats&, PieceType); - MovePicker(const Position&, Move, Depth, const HistoryStats&, Move*, Search::Stack*, Value); + MovePicker(const Position&, Move, Depth, const HistoryStats&, Move*, Search::Stack*); template Move next_move(); diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index 3985ad30..c6bc8e37 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check and at SpNode search starts from here Move countermoves[] = { Countermoves[pos.piece_on(prevMoveSq)][prevMoveSq].first, Countermoves[pos.piece_on(prevMoveSq)][prevMoveSq].second }; - MovePicker mp(pos, ttMove, depth, History, countermoves, ss, PvNode ? -VALUE_INFINITE : beta); + MovePicker mp(pos, ttMove, depth, History, countermoves, ss); CheckInfo ci(pos); value = bestValue; // Workaround a bogus 'uninitialized' warning under gcc singularExtensionNode = !RootNode -- 2.39.2