From 995ee4b31105ad8c7976cc68c11fabfdc5108e63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: xoto10 Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 21:50:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Retuned values after eval quantize patch. The last search tune patch was tested before the implementation of #2733 which presumably changed the search characteristics noticeably. Another tuning run was done, see https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee5b434ca6c451633a9a08c and the updated values passed these tests: STC: LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50} Total: 34352 W: 6600 L: 6360 D: 21392 Ptnml(0-2): 581, 3947, 7914, 4119, 615 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee62f05ca6c451633a9a15f LTC 60+0.6 th 1 : LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75} Total: 11176 W: 1499 L: 1304 D: 8373 Ptnml(0-2): 69, 933, 3403, 1100, 83 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee6205bca6c451633a9a147 SMP LTC 20+0.2 th 8 : LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75} Total: 54032 W: 6126 L: 5826 D: 42080 Ptnml(0-2): 278, 4454, 17280, 4698, 306 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee62f25ca6c451633a9a162 Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2742 Bench 4957812 --- src/search.cpp | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index 5ad650d2..cf89a892 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ namespace { constexpr uint64_t TtHitAverageResolution = 1024; // Razor and futility margins - constexpr int RazorMargin = 516; + constexpr int RazorMargin = 527; Value futility_margin(Depth d, bool improving) { - return Value(224 * (d - improving)); + return Value(227 * (d - improving)); } // Reductions lookup table, initialized at startup @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ namespace { Depth reduction(bool i, Depth d, int mn) { int r = Reductions[d] * Reductions[mn]; - return (r + 529) / 1024 + (!i && r > 1050); + return (r + 570) / 1024 + (!i && r > 1018); } constexpr int futility_move_count(bool improving, Depth depth) { @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ namespace { // History and stats update bonus, based on depth int stat_bonus(Depth d) { - return d > 15 ? 28 : 19 * d * d + 135 * d - 136; + return d > 15 ? 27 : 17 * d * d + 133 * d - 134; } // Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3fold-blindness @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ namespace { void Search::init() { for (int i = 1; i < MAX_MOVES; ++i) - Reductions[i] = int((24.9 + std::log(Threads.size())) * std::log(i)); + Reductions[i] = int((24.8 + std::log(Threads.size())) * std::log(i)); } @@ -403,12 +403,12 @@ void Thread::search() { if (rootDepth >= 4) { Value prev = rootMoves[pvIdx].previousScore; - delta = Value(21); + delta = Value(19); alpha = std::max(prev - delta,-VALUE_INFINITE); beta = std::min(prev + delta, VALUE_INFINITE); // Adjust contempt based on root move's previousScore (dynamic contempt) - int dct = ct + (104 - ct / 2) * prev / (abs(prev) + 143); + int dct = ct + (110 - ct / 2) * prev / (abs(prev) + 140); contempt = (us == WHITE ? make_score(dct, dct / 2) : -make_score(dct, dct / 2)); @@ -506,13 +506,13 @@ void Thread::search() { && !Threads.stop && !mainThread->stopOnPonderhit) { - double fallingEval = (293 + 6 * (mainThread->bestPreviousScore - bestValue) - + 6 * (mainThread->iterValue[iterIdx] - bestValue)) / 742.0; + double fallingEval = (296 + 6 * (mainThread->bestPreviousScore - bestValue) + + 6 * (mainThread->iterValue[iterIdx] - bestValue)) / 725.0; fallingEval = Utility::clamp(fallingEval, 0.5, 1.5); // If the bestMove is stable over several iterations, reduce time accordingly - timeReduction = lastBestMoveDepth + 10 < completedDepth ? 1.93 : 0.96; - double reduction = (1.36 + mainThread->previousTimeReduction) / (2.21 * timeReduction); + timeReduction = lastBestMoveDepth + 10 < completedDepth ? 1.92 : 0.95; + double reduction = (1.47 + mainThread->previousTimeReduction) / (2.22 * timeReduction); // Use part of the gained time from a previous stable move for the current move for (Thread* th : Threads) @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ void Thread::search() { } else if ( Threads.increaseDepth && !mainThread->ponder - && Time.elapsed() > totalTime * 0.57) + && Time.elapsed() > totalTime * 0.56) Threads.increaseDepth = false; else Threads.increaseDepth = true; @@ -819,10 +819,10 @@ namespace { // Step 9. Null move search with verification search (~40 Elo) if ( !PvNode && (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL - && (ss-1)->statScore < 24714 + && (ss-1)->statScore < 23824 && eval >= beta && eval >= ss->staticEval - && ss->staticEval >= beta - 29 * depth - 31 * improving + 119 * ttPv + 299 + && ss->staticEval >= beta - 33 * depth - 33 * improving + 112 * ttPv + 311 && !excludedMove && pos.non_pawn_material(us) && (ss->ply >= thisThread->nmpMinPly || us != thisThread->nmpColor)) @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ namespace { assert(eval - beta >= 0); // Null move dynamic reduction based on depth and value - Depth R = (793 + 70 * depth) / 252 + std::min(int(eval - beta) / 192, 3); + Depth R = (737 + 77 * depth) / 246 + std::min(int(eval - beta) / 192, 3); ss->currentMove = MOVE_NULL; ss->continuationHistory = &thisThread->continuationHistory[0][0][NO_PIECE][0]; @@ -870,10 +870,10 @@ namespace { // If we have a good enough capture and a reduced search returns a value // much above beta, we can (almost) safely prune the previous move. if ( !PvNode - && depth > 5 + && depth > 4 && abs(beta) < VALUE_TB_WIN_IN_MAX_PLY) { - Value raisedBeta = beta + 182 - 48 * improving; + Value raisedBeta = beta + 176 - 49 * improving; assert(raisedBeta < VALUE_INFINITE); MovePicker mp(pos, ttMove, raisedBeta - ss->staticEval, &captureHistory); int probCutCount = 0; @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ namespace { // If the qsearch held, perform the regular search if (value >= raisedBeta) - value = -search(pos, ss+1, -raisedBeta, -raisedBeta+1, depth - 5, !cutNode); + value = -search(pos, ss+1, -raisedBeta, -raisedBeta+1, depth - 4, !cutNode); pos.undo_move(move); @@ -1003,15 +1003,15 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here // Futility pruning: parent node (~5 Elo) if ( lmrDepth < 6 && !ss->inCheck - && ss->staticEval + 252 + 176 * lmrDepth <= alpha + && ss->staticEval + 284 + 188 * lmrDepth <= alpha && (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - + (*contHist[5])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] / 2 < 30251) + + (*contHist[5])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] / 2 < 28388) continue; // Prune moves with negative SEE (~20 Elo) - if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-(31 - std::min(lmrDepth, 18)) * lmrDepth * lmrDepth))) + if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-(29 - std::min(lmrDepth, 17)) * lmrDepth * lmrDepth))) continue; } else @@ -1027,11 +1027,11 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here && lmrDepth < 6 && !(PvNode && abs(bestValue) < 2) && !ss->inCheck - && ss->staticEval + 264 + 397 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[MG][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] <= alpha) + && ss->staticEval + 267 + 391 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[MG][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] <= alpha) continue; // See based pruning - if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-192) * depth)) // (~25 Elo) + if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-202) * depth)) // (~25 Elo) continue; } } @@ -1144,12 +1144,12 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here || moveCountPruning || ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] <= alpha || cutNode - || thisThread->ttHitAverage < 399 * TtHitAverageResolution * TtHitAverageWindow / 1024)) + || thisThread->ttHitAverage < 415 * TtHitAverageResolution * TtHitAverageWindow / 1024)) { Depth r = reduction(improving, depth, moveCount); // Decrease reduction if the ttHit running average is large - if (thisThread->ttHitAverage > 492 * TtHitAverageResolution * TtHitAverageWindow / 1024) + if (thisThread->ttHitAverage > 473 * TtHitAverageResolution * TtHitAverageWindow / 1024) r--; // Reduction if other threads are searching this position. @@ -1164,7 +1164,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here r++; // Decrease reduction if opponent's move count is high (~5 Elo) - if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 14) + if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 13) r--; // Decrease reduction if ttMove has been singularly extended (~3 Elo) @@ -1192,17 +1192,17 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here + (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - - 4926; + - 4826; // Decrease/increase reduction by comparing opponent's stat score (~10 Elo) - if (ss->statScore >= -99 && (ss-1)->statScore < -116) + if (ss->statScore >= -100 && (ss-1)->statScore < -112) r--; - else if ((ss-1)->statScore >= -117 && ss->statScore < -150) + else if ((ss-1)->statScore >= -125 && ss->statScore < -138) r++; // Decrease/increase reduction for moves with a good/bad history (~30 Elo) - r -= ss->statScore / 15896; + r -= ss->statScore / 14615; } else { @@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here // Unless giving check, this capture is likely bad if ( !givesCheck - && ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] + 200 * depth <= alpha) + && ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] + 211 * depth <= alpha) r++; } @@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here if (PvNode && bestValue > alpha) alpha = bestValue; - futilityBase = bestValue + 138; + futilityBase = bestValue + 141; } const PieceToHistory* contHist[] = { (ss-1)->continuationHistory, (ss-2)->continuationHistory, @@ -1724,8 +1724,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here thisThread->counterMoves[pos.piece_on(prevSq)][prevSq] = move; } - if (depth > 12 && ss->ply < MAX_LPH) - thisThread->lowPlyHistory[ss->ply][from_to(move)] << stat_bonus(depth - 7); + if (depth > 11 && ss->ply < MAX_LPH) + thisThread->lowPlyHistory[ss->ply][from_to(move)] << stat_bonus(depth - 6); } // When playing with strength handicap, choose best move among a set of RootMoves -- 2.39.2