From d72e862a5b4bc65f04c4f40f9005042d0e9eee9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joona Kiiski Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:29:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Remove one hack caused by misunderstanding No functional change Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba --- src/search.cpp | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp index ed15902d..36ed82f2 100644 --- a/src/search.cpp +++ b/src/search.cpp @@ -804,8 +804,8 @@ namespace { beta = *betaPtr; isCheck = pos.is_check(); - // Step 1. Initialize node and poll (omitted at root, but I can see no good reason for this, FIXME) - // Step 2. Check for aborted search (omitted at root, because we do not initialize root node) + // Step 1. Initialize node and poll (omitted at root, init_ss_array() has already initialized root node) + // Step 2. Check for aborted search (omitted at root) // Step 3. Mate distance pruning (omitted at root) // Step 4. Transposition table lookup (omitted at root) @@ -813,8 +813,6 @@ namespace { // At root we do this only to get reference value for child nodes if (!isCheck) ss[0].eval = evaluate(pos, ei, 0); - else - ss[0].eval = VALUE_NONE; // HACK because we do not initialize root node // Step 6. Razoring (omitted at root) // Step 7. Static null move pruning (omitted at root) -- 2.39.2