X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fevaluate.cpp;h=d5844593fe45a67ce417085012eab41054613e9f;hb=d6b6360ff5dcdffa141f50d0a81d0be7c6324c71;hp=9e3eaba512c5e1de107d9e2f438f1a0e954abd80;hpb=18389e269d43af69c96521f3fe9d85e6b7ed073c;p=stockfish diff --git a/src/evaluate.cpp b/src/evaluate.cpp index 9e3eaba5..d5844593 100644 --- a/src/evaluate.cpp +++ b/src/evaluate.cpp @@ -1051,36 +1051,37 @@ make_v: Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos, int* complexity) { Value v; - Color stm = pos.side_to_move(); Value psq = pos.psq_eg_stm(); - // Deciding between classical and NNUE eval (~10 Elo): for high PSQ imbalance we use classical, - // but we switch to NNUE during long shuffling or with high material on the board. - bool useClassical = (pos.count() > 7) - && abs(psq) * 5 > (856 + pos.non_pawn_material() / 64) * (10 + pos.rule50_count()); - - // Deciding between classical and NNUE eval (~10 Elo): for high PSQ imbalance we use classical, - // but we switch to NNUE during long shuffling or with high material on the board. - if (!useNNUE || useClassical) - { - v = Evaluation(pos).value(); - useClassical = abs(v) >= 297; - } - // If result of a classical evaluation is much lower than threshold fall back to NNUE - if (useNNUE && !useClassical) + // We use the much less accurate but faster Classical eval when the NNUE + // option is set to false. Otherwise we use the NNUE eval unless the + // PSQ advantage is decisive and several pieces remain. (~3 Elo) + bool useClassical = !useNNUE || (pos.count() > 7 && abs(psq) > 1760); + + if (useClassical) + v = Evaluation(pos).value(); + else { - int nnueComplexity; - int scale = 1064 + 106 * pos.non_pawn_material() / 5120; - Value optimism = pos.this_thread()->optimism[stm]; - - Value nnue = NNUE::evaluate(pos, true, &nnueComplexity); - // Blend nnue complexity with (semi)classical complexity - nnueComplexity = (104 * nnueComplexity + 131 * abs(nnue - psq)) / 256; - if (complexity) // Return hybrid NNUE complexity to caller - *complexity = nnueComplexity; - - optimism = optimism * (269 + nnueComplexity) / 256; - v = (nnue * scale + optimism * (scale - 754)) / 1024; + int nnueComplexity; + int scale = 1064 + 106 * pos.non_pawn_material() / 5120; + + Color stm = pos.side_to_move(); + Value optimism = pos.this_thread()->optimism[stm]; + + Value nnue = NNUE::evaluate(pos, true, &nnueComplexity); + + // Blend nnue complexity with (semi)classical complexity + nnueComplexity = ( 416 * nnueComplexity + + 424 * abs(psq - nnue) + + (optimism > 0 ? int(optimism) * int(psq - nnue) : 0) + ) / 1024; + + // Return hybrid NNUE complexity to caller + if (complexity) + *complexity = nnueComplexity; + + optimism = optimism * (269 + nnueComplexity) / 256; + v = (nnue * scale + optimism * (scale - 754)) / 1024; } // Damp down the evaluation linearly when shuffling @@ -1091,7 +1092,7 @@ Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos, int* complexity) { // When not using NNUE, return classical complexity to caller if (complexity && (!useNNUE || useClassical)) - *complexity = abs(v - psq); + *complexity = abs(v - psq); return v; } @@ -1114,7 +1115,6 @@ std::string Eval::trace(Position& pos) { std::memset(scores, 0, sizeof(scores)); // Reset any global variable used in eval - pos.this_thread()->depth = 0; pos.this_thread()->trend = SCORE_ZERO; pos.this_thread()->bestValue = VALUE_ZERO; pos.this_thread()->optimism[WHITE] = VALUE_ZERO;