X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fsearch.cpp;h=fba9e53559f5b883f0cd479923ac2abe7a88ab78;hb=141410f177c2514493f40d21a426490047cf97de;hp=791cbc6fb580901a567296d23a0eeed08f892969;hpb=b366c7dc38145278a00c51a560a4f7b6e03a0b2a;p=stockfish

diff --git a/src/search.cpp b/src/search.cpp
index 791cbc6f..fba9e535 100644
--- a/src/search.cpp
+++ b/src/search.cpp
@@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ namespace {
   Value value_to_tt(Value v, int ply);
   Value value_from_tt(Value v, int ply);
   bool ok_to_use_TT(const TTEntry* tte, Depth depth, Value beta, int ply);
-  bool ok_to_use_TT_PV(const TTEntry* tte, Depth depth, Value alpha, Value beta, int ply);
   bool connected_threat(const Position& pos, Move m, Move threat);
   Value refine_eval(const TTEntry* tte, Value defaultEval, int ply);
   void update_history(const Position& pos, Move move, Depth depth, Move movesSearched[], int moveCount);
@@ -658,7 +657,7 @@ namespace {
             int prevDelta1 = bestValues[iteration - 1] - bestValues[iteration - 2];
             int prevDelta2 = bestValues[iteration - 2] - bestValues[iteration - 3];
 
-            aspirationDelta = Max(abs(prevDelta1) + abs(prevDelta2) / 2, 16);
+            aspirationDelta = Min(Max(abs(prevDelta1) + abs(prevDelta2) / 2, 16), 24);
             aspirationDelta = (aspirationDelta + 7) / 8 * 8; // Round to match grainSize
 
             alpha = Max(bestValues[iteration - 1] - aspirationDelta, -VALUE_INFINITE);
@@ -839,10 +838,13 @@ namespace {
     tte = TT.retrieve(posKey);
     ttMove = tte ? tte->move() : MOVE_NONE;
 
-    // At PV nodes we check for exact scores within (alha, beta) range, while
-    // at non-PV nodes we check for and return a fail high/low. Biggest advantage
-    // at probing at PV nodes is to have a smooth experience in analysis mode.
-    if (!Root && tte && (PvNode ? ok_to_use_TT_PV(tte, depth, alpha, beta, ply) : ok_to_use_TT(tte, depth, beta, ply)))
+    // At PV nodes we check for exact scores, while at non-PV nodes we check for
+    // and return a fail high/low. Biggest advantage at probing at PV nodes is
+    // to have a smooth experience in analysis mode.
+    if (   !Root
+        && tte
+        && (PvNode ? tte->depth() >= depth && tte->type() == VALUE_TYPE_EXACT
+                   : ok_to_use_TT(tte, depth, beta, ply)))
     {
         TT.refresh(tte);
         ss->bestMove = ttMove; // Can be MOVE_NONE
@@ -1794,9 +1796,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
 
 
   // ok_to_use_TT() returns true if a transposition table score
-  // can be used at a given point in search. There are two versions
-  // one to be used in non-PV nodes and one in PV nodes where we look
-  // for an exact score that falls between (alha, beta) boundaries.
+  // can be used at a given point in search.
 
   bool ok_to_use_TT(const TTEntry* tte, Depth depth, Value beta, int ply) {
 
@@ -1810,17 +1810,6 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
               || ((tte->type() & VALUE_TYPE_UPPER) && v < beta));
   }
 
-  bool ok_to_use_TT_PV(const TTEntry* tte, Depth depth, Value alpha, Value beta, int ply) {
-
-    Value v = value_from_tt(tte->value(), ply);
-
-     return   tte->depth() >= depth
-           && tte->type() == VALUE_TYPE_EXACT
-           && tte->move() != MOVE_NONE
-           && v < beta
-           && v > alpha;
-  }
-
 
   // refine_eval() returns the transposition table score if
   // possible otherwise falls back on static position evaluation.