From: Eelco de Groot Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 20:50:32 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Fix check for bishop pair in material imbalance X-Git-Url: https://git.sesse.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=679c2ea2275d6a978cea10e4260ee0598e044c82;p=stockfish Fix check for bishop pair in material imbalance Prefer pos.bishop_pair() to pos.count(WHITE) > 1 because the first checks that the two bishops are on different color squares. Although the change seems to kick in only in very rare cases, quite surprisingly it was able to pass SPRT test at short TC. LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) Total: 39818 W: 8174 L: 7956 D: 23688 bench: 3453941 --- diff --git a/src/material.cpp b/src/material.cpp index 0f1e19b9..88882959 100644 --- a/src/material.cpp +++ b/src/material.cpp @@ -263,14 +263,14 @@ Entry* probe(const Position& pos, Table& entries, Endgames& endgames) { e->spaceWeight = make_score(minorPieceCount * minorPieceCount, 0); } - // Evaluate the material imbalance. We use PIECE_TYPE_NONE as a place holder + // Evaluate the material imbalance. We use NO_PIECE_TYPE as a place holder // for the bishop pair "extended piece", this allow us to be more flexible // in defining bishop pair bonuses. const int pieceCount[COLOR_NB][PIECE_TYPE_NB] = { - { pos.count(WHITE) > 1, pos.count(WHITE), pos.count(WHITE), - pos.count(WHITE) , pos.count(WHITE), pos.count(WHITE) }, - { pos.count(BLACK) > 1, pos.count(BLACK), pos.count(BLACK), - pos.count(BLACK) , pos.count(BLACK), pos.count(BLACK) } }; + { pos.bishop_pair(WHITE) , pos.count(WHITE), pos.count(WHITE), + pos.count(WHITE), pos.count(WHITE), pos.count(WHITE) }, + { pos.bishop_pair(BLACK) , pos.count(BLACK), pos.count(BLACK), + pos.count(BLACK), pos.count(BLACK), pos.count(BLACK) } }; e->value = (int16_t)((imbalance(pieceCount) - imbalance(pieceCount)) / 16); return e;