/*
Stockfish, a UCI chess playing engine derived from Glaurung 2.1
Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tord Romstad (Glaurung author)
- Copyright (C) 2008-2009 Marco Costalba
+ Copyright (C) 2008-2010 Marco Costalba, Joona Kiiski, Tord Romstad
Stockfish is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
/// attacking side a bonus for driving the defending king towards the edge
/// of the board, and for keeping the distance between the two kings small.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KXK>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KXK>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(weakerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.piece_count(weakerSide, PAWN) == Value(0));
/// Mate with KBN vs K. This is similar to KX vs K, but we have to drive the
/// defending king towards a corner square of the right color.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KBNK>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KBNK>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(weakerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.piece_count(weakerSide, PAWN) == Value(0));
/// KP vs K. This endgame is evaluated with the help of a bitbase.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KPK>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KPK>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(weakerSide) == Value(0));
/// far advanced with support of the king, while the attacking king is far
/// away.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KRKP>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KRKP>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
/// KR vs KB. This is very simple, and always returns drawish scores. The
/// score is slightly bigger when the defending king is close to the edge.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KRKB>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KRKB>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
/// KR vs KN. The attacking side has slightly better winning chances than
/// in KR vs KB, particularly if the king and the knight are far apart.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KRKN>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KRKN>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
/// for the defending side in the search, this is usually sufficient to be
/// able to win KQ vs KR.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KQKR>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KQKR>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == QueenValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
}
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KBBKN>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KBBKN>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, BISHOP) == 2);
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == 2*BishopValueMidgame);
result += Value(square_distance(bksq, nsq) * 32);
// Bonus for restricting the knight's mobility
- result += Value((8 - count_1s_max_15(pos.piece_attacks_from<KNIGHT>(nsq))) * 8);
+ result += Value((8 - count_1s_max_15(pos.attacks_from<KNIGHT>(nsq))) * 8);
return (strongerSide == pos.side_to_move() ? result : -result);
}
/// K and two minors vs K and one or two minors or K and two knights against
/// king alone are always draw.
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KmmKm>::apply(const Position&) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KmmKm>::apply(const Position&) const {
return Value(0);
}
template<>
-Value EvaluationFunction<KNNK>::apply(const Position&) {
+Value EvaluationFunction<KNNK>::apply(const Position&) const {
return Value(0);
}
/// returned. If not, the return value is SCALE_FACTOR_NONE, i.e. no scaling
/// will be used.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPsK>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPsK>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == BishopValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, BISHOP) == 1);
/// It tests for fortress draws with a rook on the third rank defended by
/// a pawn.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KQKRPs>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KQKRPs>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == QueenValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, QUEEN) == 1);
&& relative_rank(weakerSide, pos.king_square(strongerSide)) >= RANK_4
&& (pos.pieces(ROOK, weakerSide) & relative_rank_bb(weakerSide, RANK_3))
&& (pos.pieces(PAWN, weakerSide) & relative_rank_bb(weakerSide, RANK_2))
- && (pos.piece_attacks_from<KING>(kingSq) & pos.pieces(PAWN, weakerSide)))
+ && (pos.attacks_from<KING>(kingSq) & pos.pieces(PAWN, weakerSide)))
{
Square rsq = pos.piece_list(weakerSide, ROOK, 0);
- if (pos.pawn_attacks_from(rsq, strongerSide) & pos.pieces(PAWN, weakerSide))
+ if (pos.attacks_from<PAWN>(rsq, strongerSide) & pos.pieces(PAWN, weakerSide))
return ScaleFactor(0);
}
return SCALE_FACTOR_NONE;
/// It would also be nice to rewrite the actual code for this function,
/// which is mostly copied from Glaurung 1.x, and not very pretty.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KRPKR>::apply(const Position &pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KRPKR>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 1);
/// single pattern: If the stronger side has no pawns and the defending king
/// is actively placed, the position is drawish.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KRPPKRP>::apply(const Position &pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KRPPKRP>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 2);
/// against king. There is just a single rule here: If all pawns are on
/// the same rook file and are blocked by the defending king, it's a draw.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KPsK>::apply(const Position &pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KPsK>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) >= 2);
/// it's a draw. If the two bishops have opposite color, it's almost always
/// a draw.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPKB>::apply(const Position &pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPKB>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == BishopValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, BISHOP) == 1);
Bitboard ray = ray_bb(pawnSq, (strongerSide == WHITE)? SIGNED_DIR_N : SIGNED_DIR_S);
if (ray & pos.pieces(KING, weakerSide))
return ScaleFactor(0);
- if( (pos.piece_attacks_from<BISHOP>(weakerBishopSq) & ray)
+ if( (pos.attacks_from<BISHOP>(weakerBishopSq) & ray)
&& square_distance(weakerBishopSq, pawnSq) >= 3)
return ScaleFactor(0);
}
/// KBPPKBScalingFunction scales KBPP vs KB endgames. It detects a few basic
/// draws with opposite-colored bishops.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPPKB>::apply(const Position& pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPPKB>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == BishopValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, BISHOP) == 1);
if ( ksq == blockSq1
&& square_color(ksq) != square_color(wbsq)
&& ( bbsq == blockSq2
- || (pos.piece_attacks_from<BISHOP>(blockSq2) & pos.pieces(BISHOP, weakerSide))
+ || (pos.attacks_from<BISHOP>(blockSq2) & pos.pieces(BISHOP, weakerSide))
|| rank_distance(r1, r2) >= 2))
return ScaleFactor(0);
else if ( ksq == blockSq2
&& square_color(ksq) != square_color(wbsq)
&& ( bbsq == blockSq1
- || (pos.piece_attacks_from<BISHOP>(blockSq1) & pos.pieces(BISHOP, weakerSide))))
+ || (pos.attacks_from<BISHOP>(blockSq1) & pos.pieces(BISHOP, weakerSide))))
return ScaleFactor(0);
else
return SCALE_FACTOR_NONE;
/// square of the king is not of the same color as the stronger side's bishop,
/// it's a draw.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPKN>::apply(const Position &pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KBPKN>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == BishopValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, BISHOP) == 1);
/// If the pawn is a rook pawn on the 7th rank and the defending king prevents
/// the pawn from advancing, the position is drawn.
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KNPK>::apply(const Position &pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KNPK>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == KnightValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, KNIGHT) == 1);
/// advanced and not on a rook file; in this case it is often possible to win
/// (e.g. 8/4k3/3p4/3P4/6K1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1).
template<>
-ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KPKP>::apply(const Position &pos) {
+ScaleFactor ScalingFunction<KPKP>::apply(const Position& pos) const {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(weakerSide) == Value(0));