- // En passant capture with check? We have already handled the case
- // of direct checks and ordinary discovered check, so the only case we
- // need to handle is the unusual case of a discovered check through
- // the captured pawn.
+ // En passant capture with check? We have already handled the case of direct
+ // checks and ordinary discovered check, so the only case we need to handle
+ // is the unusual case of a discovered check through the captured pawn.