Small syntactic tweak.

[nageru] / densify.vert

diff --git a/densify.vert b/densify.vert
index e4db8fba94789e57145d7da20f1ccae455342290..0572afbdd54e015e82afd5ef2140330925fbdc2d 100644 (file)
--- a/densify.vert
+++ b/densify.vert
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 in vec2 position;
 out vec2 image_pos;
 flat out vec2 flow_du;
+flat out float mean_diff;
 
 uniform int width_patches;
 uniform vec2 patch_size;  // In 0..1 coordinates.
@@ -14,12 +15,23 @@ void main()
        int patch_x = gl_InstanceID % width_patches;
        int patch_y = gl_InstanceID / width_patches;
 
-       // TODO: Lock the bottom left of the patch to an integer number of pixels?
+       // Increase the patch size a bit; since patch spacing is not necessarily
+       // an integer number of pixels, and we don't use conservative rasterization,
+       // we could be missing the outer edges of the patch. And it seemingly helps
+       // a little bit in general to have some more candidates as well -- although
+       // this is measured without variational refinement, so it might be moot
+       // with it.
+       //
+       // This maps [0.0,1.0] to [-0.25,1.25], ie. extends the patch by 25% in
+       // all directions.
+       vec2 grown_pos = (position * 1.5) - 0.25;
 
-       image_pos = patch_spacing * ivec2(patch_x, patch_y) + patch_size * position;
+       image_pos = patch_spacing * ivec2(patch_x, patch_y) + patch_size * grown_pos;
 
        // Find the flow value for this patch, and send it on to the fragment shader.
-       flow_du = texelFetch(flow_tex, ivec2(patch_x, patch_y), 0).xy;
+       vec3 flow_du_and_mean_diff = texelFetch(flow_tex, ivec2(patch_x, patch_y), 0).xyz;
+       flow_du = flow_du_and_mean_diff.xy;
+       mean_diff = flow_du_and_mean_diff.z;
 
        // The result of glOrtho(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0) is:
        //