Updated documentation: Tell about recursion in internal ls; tell that we have Debian...

[betaftpd] / doc / RFC-COMPLIANCE

diff --git a/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE b/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE
index 0884e597a82a496bcbf39ddc1d5ed8d5849d2802..1213aa6b7c5599ef496c013805e00d674d2f5eca 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE
+++ b/doc/RFC-COMPLIANCE
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ this could be a problem in today's FTP world.
 
 These commands are believed to be fully compliant with RFC959 and RFC1123:
 PORT, PASV, USER, PASS, CWD, CDUP, QUIT, DELE, PWD, SYST, NOOP, STOR, APPE,
-ABOR, RNFR, RNTO, MKD, RMD, ALLO, REIN, ACCT, HELP and STAT.
+ABOR, RNFR, RNTO, MKD, RMD, ALLO, REIN, ACCT, HELP, STAT and MODE.
 
 These commands are not implemented at all: SMNT, STOU and SITE.
 
@@ -30,24 +30,20 @@ binary mode. RFC959 violation, but RFC1123 excuses the missing ASCII mode.
 RFC1123-compliant.)
 
 STRU:
-The STRU command is included, but it ignores its argument and always uses
-file structure (if you really need record structure, mail me; when I'm done
+The STRU command is included, but only file structure is supported (all other
+modes are refused; if you really need record structure, mail me; when I'm done
 laughing, I will consider implementing it). RFC959 violation, but RFC1123
 excuses the missing record structure.
 
-MODE:
-The MODE command is included, but it ignores its argument and always uses
-stream mode (the other two are never used anyway). RFC959 violation, it
-requires all other modes to be refused. 
-
 RETR:
 The RETR command is believed to be compliant with RFC959. (There is no default
 data port, though -- I'm unsure about this.)
 
 LIST/NLST:
-The LIST and NLST commands ignore some flags (like `-R') given to them. (This
-is much better than it was before, though.) The RFCs say nothing about
-directory listing formats anyway, but I guess this is a violation of GNU ls :-)
+The LIST and NLST commands ignore some flags (like `-1') given to them. (This
+is much better than it was before, though, even recursive listings should work
+now.) The RFCs say nothing about directory listing formats anyway, but I guess
+this is a violation of GNU ls :-)
 
 REST:
 The REST command is implemented, but it doesn't check that its argument really