easy reviewable that again leads us to:
* use of a revision control system like git
* separation of cosmetic from non-cosmetic changes (this is almost entirely
- ignored by mentors and students in soc 2006 which might lead to a suprise
+ ignored by mentors and students in soc 2006 which might lead to a surprise
when the code will be reviewed at the end before a possible inclusion in
FFmpeg, individual changes were generally not reviewable due to cosmetics).
* frequent commits, so that comments can be provided early