expect_equal(expected_data, out_data, 3, 2);
}
+TEST(EffectChainTest, TopLeftOrigin) {
+ float data[] = {
+ 0.0f, 0.25f, 0.3f,
+ 0.75f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
+ };
+ // Note that EffectChainTester assumes bottom-left origin, so by setting
+ // top-left, we will get flipped data back.
+ float expected_data[6] = {
+ 0.75f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
+ 0.0f, 0.25f, 0.3f,
+ };
+ float out_data[6];
+ EffectChainTester tester(data, 3, 2, FORMAT_GRAYSCALE, COLORSPACE_sRGB, GAMMA_LINEAR);
+ tester.get_chain()->set_output_origin(OUTPUT_ORIGIN_TOP_LEFT);
+ tester.run(out_data, GL_RED, COLORSPACE_sRGB, GAMMA_LINEAR);
+
+ expect_equal(expected_data, out_data, 3, 2);
+}
+
// A dummy effect that inverts its input.
class InvertEffect : public Effect {
public:
expect_equal(data, out_data, size, size);
}
+// An effect that is like VirtualResizeEffect, but always has virtual and real
+// sizes the same (and promises this).
+class NonVirtualResizeEffect : public VirtualResizeEffect {
+public:
+ NonVirtualResizeEffect(int width, int height)
+ : VirtualResizeEffect(width, height, width, height) {}
+ virtual string effect_type_id() const { return "NonVirtualResizeEffect"; }
+ virtual bool sets_virtual_output_size() const { return false; }
+};
+
+// An effect that promises one-to-one sampling (unlike IdentityEffect).
+class OneToOneEffect : public Effect {
+public:
+ OneToOneEffect() {}
+ virtual string effect_type_id() const { return "OneToOneEffect"; }
+ string output_fragment_shader() { return read_file("identity.frag"); }
+ virtual bool one_to_one_sampling() const { return true; }
+};
+
+TEST(EffectChainTest, NoBounceWithOneToOneSampling) {
+ const int size = 2;
+ float data[size * size] = {
+ 1.0f, 0.0f,
+ 0.0f, 1.0f,
+ };
+ float out_data[size * size];
+
+ EffectChainTester tester(data, size, size, FORMAT_GRAYSCALE, COLORSPACE_sRGB, GAMMA_LINEAR);
+
+ RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect> *effect1 = new RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect>();
+ RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect> *effect2 = new RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect>();
+
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(new NonVirtualResizeEffect(size, size));
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(effect1);
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(effect2);
+ tester.run(out_data, GL_RED, COLORSPACE_sRGB, GAMMA_LINEAR);
+
+ expect_equal(data, out_data, size, size);
+
+ // The first OneToOneEffect should be in the same phase as its input.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, effect1->replaced_node->incoming_links.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(effect1->replaced_node->incoming_links[0]->containing_phase,
+ effect1->replaced_node->containing_phase);
+
+ // The second OneToOneEffect, too.
+ EXPECT_EQ(effect1->replaced_node->containing_phase,
+ effect2->replaced_node->containing_phase);
+}
+
+TEST(EffectChainTest, BounceWhenOneToOneIsBroken) {
+ const int size = 2;
+ float data[size * size] = {
+ 1.0f, 0.0f,
+ 0.0f, 1.0f,
+ };
+ float out_data[size * size];
+
+ EffectChainTester tester(data, size, size, FORMAT_GRAYSCALE, COLORSPACE_sRGB, GAMMA_LINEAR);
+
+ RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect> *effect1 = new RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect>();
+ RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect> *effect2 = new RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect>();
+ RewritingEffect<IdentityEffect> *effect3 = new RewritingEffect<IdentityEffect>();
+ RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect> *effect4 = new RewritingEffect<OneToOneEffect>();
+
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(new NonVirtualResizeEffect(size, size));
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(effect1);
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(effect2);
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(effect3);
+ tester.get_chain()->add_effect(effect4);
+ tester.run(out_data, GL_RED, COLORSPACE_sRGB, GAMMA_LINEAR);
+
+ expect_equal(data, out_data, size, size);
+
+ // The NonVirtualResizeEffect should be in a different phase from
+ // the IdentityEffect (since the latter is not one-to-one),
+ // ie., the chain should be broken somewhere between them, but exactly
+ // where doesn't matter.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, effect1->replaced_node->incoming_links.size());
+ EXPECT_NE(effect1->replaced_node->incoming_links[0]->containing_phase,
+ effect3->replaced_node->containing_phase);
+
+ // The last OneToOneEffect should also be in the same phase as the
+ // IdentityEffect (the phase was already broken).
+ EXPECT_EQ(effect3->replaced_node->containing_phase,
+ effect4->replaced_node->containing_phase);
+}
+
// Does not use EffectChainTest, so that it can construct an EffectChain without
// a shared ResourcePool (which is also properly destroyed afterwards).
// Also turns on debugging to test that code path.