macroblock_analyse: simplify cost comparisons. (cosmetic)

[x264] / encoder / me.c

diff --git a/encoder/me.c b/encoder/me.c
index 46b0548b611fbd5a9538d67fb66db8e9b273690c..d343b2ac2cdfcb5d39ccc7e71daed5586de8447f 100644 (file)
--- a/encoder/me.c
+++ b/encoder/me.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void x264_me_search_ref( x264_t *h, x264_me_t *m, int (*mvc)[2], int i_mvc, int
      * them yourself */
     bmx = x264_clip3( ( m->mvp[0] + 2 ) >> 2, mv_x_min, mv_x_max );
     bmy = x264_clip3( ( m->mvp[1] + 2 ) >> 2, mv_y_min, mv_y_max );
-    bcost = 1<<30;
+    bcost = COST_MAX;
     COST_MV( bmx, bmy );
     /* I don't know why this helps */
     bcost -= p_cost_mvx[ bmx<<2 ] + p_cost_mvy[ bmy<<2 ];
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void refine_subpel( x264_t *h, x264_me_t *m, int hpel_iters, int qpel_ite
     {
        for( i = step>1 ? hpel_iters : qpel_iters; i > 0; i-- )
         {
-            int bcost = 1<<30;
+            int bcost = COST_MAX;
             int bdir = 0;
             COST_MV( bmx, bmy - step, 0 );
             COST_MV( bmx, bmy + step, 1 );