Almost no change, but it is in sync with what we do in search
and in any case the ELO difference is very small (because the
events when the intermediate research triggers are very rare),
too small to be measured, we just verify we don't have any
unexpected regressions.
After 802 games at 1+0 full QUAD
Mod vs Orig +114 =581 -107 +3 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
ss->reduction = reduction<PV>(depth, i - MultiPV + 2);
if (ss->reduction)
{
ss->reduction = reduction<PV>(depth, i - MultiPV + 2);
if (ss->reduction)
{
+ assert(newDepth-ss->reduction >= OnePly);
+
// Reduced depth non-pv search using alpha as upperbound
value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth-ss->reduction);
doFullDepthSearch = (value > alpha);
}
// Reduced depth non-pv search using alpha as upperbound
value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth-ss->reduction);
doFullDepthSearch = (value > alpha);
}
+
+ // The move failed high, but if reduction is very big we could
+ // face a false positive, retry with a less aggressive reduction,
+ // if the move fails high again then go with full depth search.
+ if (doFullDepthSearch && ss->reduction > 2 * OnePly)
+ {
+ assert(newDepth - OnePly >= OnePly);
+
+ ss->reduction = OnePly;
+ value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth-ss->reduction);
+ doFullDepthSearch = (value > alpha);
+ }
+ ss->reduction = Depth(0); // Restore original reduction
}
// Step 15. Full depth search
if (doFullDepthSearch)
{
// Full depth non-pv search using alpha as upperbound
}
// Step 15. Full depth search
if (doFullDepthSearch)
{
// Full depth non-pv search using alpha as upperbound
- ss->reduction = Depth(0);
value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth);
// If we are above alpha then research at same depth but as PV
value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth);
// If we are above alpha then research at same depth but as PV