/// Evaluation functions
// Generic "mate lone king" eval
-KXKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKXK = KXKEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KXKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKKX = KXKEvaluationFunction(BLACK);
-
-// KBN vs K
-KBNKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKBNK = KBNKEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KBNKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKKBN = KBNKEvaluationFunction(BLACK);
-
-// KP vs K
-KPKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKPK = KPKEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KPKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKKP = KPKEvaluationFunction(BLACK);
-
-// KR vs KP
-KRKPEvaluationFunction EvaluateKRKP = KRKPEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KRKPEvaluationFunction EvaluateKPKR = KRKPEvaluationFunction(BLACK);
-
-// KR vs KB
-KRKBEvaluationFunction EvaluateKRKB = KRKBEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KRKBEvaluationFunction EvaluateKBKR = KRKBEvaluationFunction(BLACK);
-
-// KR vs KN
-KRKNEvaluationFunction EvaluateKRKN = KRKNEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KRKNEvaluationFunction EvaluateKNKR = KRKNEvaluationFunction(BLACK);
-
-// KQ vs KR
-KQKREvaluationFunction EvaluateKQKR = KQKREvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KQKREvaluationFunction EvaluateKRKQ = KQKREvaluationFunction(BLACK);
-
-// KBB vs KN
-KBBKNEvaluationFunction EvaluateKBBKN = KBBKNEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
-KBBKNEvaluationFunction EvaluateKNKBB = KBBKNEvaluationFunction(BLACK);
+EvaluationFunction<KXK> EvaluateKXK(WHITE), EvaluateKKX(BLACK);
// K and two minors vs K and one or two minors
-KmmKmEvaluationFunction EvaluateKmmKm = KmmKmEvaluationFunction(WHITE);
+EvaluationFunction<KmmKm> EvaluateKmmKm(WHITE);
+
+EvaluationFunction<KBNK> EvaluateKBNK(WHITE), EvaluateKKBN(BLACK); // KBN vs K
+EvaluationFunction<KPK> EvaluateKPK(WHITE), EvaluateKKP(BLACK); // KP vs K
+EvaluationFunction<KRKP> EvaluateKRKP(WHITE), EvaluateKPKR(BLACK); // KR vs KP
+EvaluationFunction<KRKB> EvaluateKRKB(WHITE), EvaluateKBKR(BLACK); // KR vs KB
+EvaluationFunction<KRKN> EvaluateKRKN(WHITE), EvaluateKNKR(BLACK); // KR vs KN
+EvaluationFunction<KQKR> EvaluateKQKR(WHITE), EvaluateKRKQ(BLACK); // KQ vs KR
+EvaluationFunction<KBBKN> EvaluateKBBKN(WHITE), EvaluateKNKBB(BLACK); // KBB vs KN
/// Scaling functions
weakerSide = opposite_color(strongerSide);
}
-KXKEvaluationFunction::KXKEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KBNKEvaluationFunction::KBNKEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KPKEvaluationFunction::KPKEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KRKPEvaluationFunction::KRKPEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KRKBEvaluationFunction::KRKBEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KRKNEvaluationFunction::KRKNEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KQKREvaluationFunction::KQKREvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KBBKNEvaluationFunction::KBBKNEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-KmmKmEvaluationFunction::KmmKmEvaluationFunction(Color c) : EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
-
-
ScalingFunction::ScalingFunction(Color c) : strongerSide(c) {
weakerSide = opposite_color(c);
}
/// King and plenty of material vs a lone king. It simply gives the
/// attacking side a bonus for driving the defending king towards the edge
/// of the board, and for keeping the distance between the two kings small.
-
-Value KXKEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KXK>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(weakerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.piece_count(weakerSide, PAWN) == Value(0));
/// Mate with KBN vs K. This is similar to KX vs K, but we have to drive the
/// defending king towards a corner square of the right color.
-
-Value KBNKEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KBNK>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(weakerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.piece_count(weakerSide, PAWN) == Value(0));
/// KP vs K. This endgame is evaluated with the help of a bitbase.
-
-Value KPKEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KPK>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == Value(0));
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(weakerSide) == Value(0));
/// a bitbase. The function below returns drawish scores when the pawn is
/// far advanced with support of the king, while the attacking king is far
/// away.
-
-Value KRKPEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KRKP>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
/// KR vs KB. This is very simple, and always returns drawish scores. The
/// score is slightly bigger when the defending king is close to the edge.
-
-Value KRKBEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KRKB>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
/// KR vs KN. The attacking side has slightly better winning chances than
/// in KR vs KB, particularly if the king and the knight are far apart.
-
-Value KRKNEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KRKN>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == RookValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
/// defending king towards the edge. If we also take care to avoid null move
/// for the defending side in the search, this is usually sufficient to be
/// able to win KQ vs KR.
-
-Value KQKREvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KQKR>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == QueenValueMidgame);
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, PAWN) == 0);
return (strongerSide == pos.side_to_move())? result : -result;
}
-
-Value KBBKNEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position& pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KBBKN>::apply(const Position& pos) {
assert(pos.piece_count(strongerSide, BISHOP) == 2);
assert(pos.non_pawn_material(strongerSide) == 2*BishopValueMidgame);
return (strongerSide == pos.side_to_move() ? result : -result);
}
-
-Value KmmKmEvaluationFunction::apply(const Position &pos) {
+template<>
+Value EvaluationFunction<KmmKm>::apply(const Position &pos) {
return Value(0);
}
//// Types
////
-/// Abstract base class for all special endgame evaluation functions:
+/// Abstract base class for all special endgame evaluation functions
class EndgameEvaluationFunction {
public:
EndgameEvaluationFunction(Color c);
virtual ~EndgameEvaluationFunction() { }
- virtual Value apply(const Position &pos) =0;
+ virtual Value apply(const Position &pos) = 0;
protected:
Color strongerSide, weakerSide;
};
-/// Subclasses for various concrete endgames:
-
-// Generic "mate lone king" eval:
-class KXKEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KXKEvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
-};
-
-// KBN vs K:
-class KBNKEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KBNKEvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
-};
-
-// KP vs K:
-class KPKEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KPKEvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
-};
-
-// KR vs KP:
-class KRKPEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KRKPEvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
-};
-
-// KR vs KB:
-class KRKBEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KRKBEvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
-};
+/// Template subclass for various concrete endgames
-// KR vs KN:
-class KRKNEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KRKNEvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
-};
-
-// KQ vs KR:
-class KQKREvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KQKREvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
+enum EndgameType {
+ KXK, // Generic "mate lone king" eval
+ KBNK, // KBN vs K
+ KPK, // KP vs K
+ KRKP, // KR vs KP
+ KRKB, // KR vs KB
+ KRKN, // KR vs KN
+ KQKR, // KQ vs KR
+ KBBKN, // KBB vs KN
+ KmmKm // K and two minors vs K and one or two minors
};
-// KBB vs KN:
-class KBBKNEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
+template<EndgameType>
+class EvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
public:
- KBBKNEvaluationFunction(Color C);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
+ explicit EvaluationFunction(Color c): EndgameEvaluationFunction(c) {}
+ Value apply(const Position& pos);
};
-// K and two minors vs K and one or two minors:
-class KmmKmEvaluationFunction : public EndgameEvaluationFunction {
-public:
- KmmKmEvaluationFunction(Color c);
- Value apply(const Position &pos);
-};
-
-
/// Abstract base class for all evaluation scaling functions:
class ScalingFunction {
//// Constants and variables
////
-// Generic "mate lone king" eval:
-extern KXKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKXK, EvaluateKKX;
-
-// KBN vs K:
-extern KBNKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKBNK, EvaluateKKBN;
-
-// KP vs K:
-extern KPKEvaluationFunction EvaluateKPK, EvaluateKKP;
-
-// KR vs KP:
-extern KRKPEvaluationFunction EvaluateKRKP, EvaluateKPKR;
-
-// KR vs KB:
-extern KRKBEvaluationFunction EvaluateKRKB, EvaluateKBKR;
-
-// KR vs KN:
-extern KRKNEvaluationFunction EvaluateKRKN, EvaluateKNKR;
-
-// KQ vs KR:
-extern KQKREvaluationFunction EvaluateKQKR, EvaluateKRKQ;
-
-// KBB vs KN:
-extern KBBKNEvaluationFunction EvaluateKBBKN, EvaluateKNKBB;
-
-// K and two minors vs K and one or two minors:
-extern KmmKmEvaluationFunction EvaluateKmmKm;
+extern EvaluationFunction<KXK> EvaluateKXK, EvaluateKKX; // Generic "mate lone king" eval
+extern EvaluationFunction<KBNK> EvaluateKBNK, EvaluateKKBN; // KBN vs K
+extern EvaluationFunction<KPK> EvaluateKPK, EvaluateKKP; // KP vs K
+extern EvaluationFunction<KRKP> EvaluateKRKP, EvaluateKPKR; // KR vs KP
+extern EvaluationFunction<KRKB> EvaluateKRKB, EvaluateKBKR; // KR vs KB
+extern EvaluationFunction<KRKN> EvaluateKRKN, EvaluateKNKR; // KR vs KN
+extern EvaluationFunction<KQKR> EvaluateKQKR, EvaluateKRKQ; // KQ vs KR
+extern EvaluationFunction<KBBKN> EvaluateKBBKN, EvaluateKNKBB; // KBB vs KN
+extern EvaluationFunction<KmmKm> EvaluateKmmKm; // K and two minors vs K and one or two minors:
// KBP vs K:
extern KBPKScalingFunction ScaleKBPK, ScaleKKBP;