Use SSE intrinsics instead of asm() for vertical SSE, finally offloading the register...

[qscale] / README

diff --git a/README b/README
index 98b88c3f406aba47113484f73520ebdf7cd11d41..be6feb972d34f9ede69615b1eb5059712ebeb6b0 100644 (file)
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ The following optimizations are possible but not done (yet?):
    filter kernel is large (ie. large amounts of scaling).
  - qscale does not use multiple processors or cores (although different cores 
    can of course work on different images at the same time).
    filter kernel is large (ie. large amounts of scaling).
  - qscale does not use multiple processors or cores (although different cores 
    can of course work on different images at the same time).

- - qscale does not make very good use of the extra eight SSE registers found
-   on 64-bit x86-compatible (usually called amd64 or x86-64) machines. In
-   fact, out of the box it might not even compile on such machines.

 
 Finally, a word of advice: Even the fastest scaler can never be as fast as not
 scaling. If you can do less work, or move it to a time where it is less user
 
 Finally, a word of advice: Even the fastest scaler can never be as fast as not
 scaling. If you can do less work, or move it to a time where it is less user