Parameter Tweaks

[stockfish] / src / evaluate.cpp

diff --git a/src/evaluate.cpp b/src/evaluate.cpp
index 3b6cbbcd8a644d47fb599107a44a565e7276533d..d5cda3d80e86ef9a9f779abc1aa6b39c2bb7108e 100644 (file)
--- a/src/evaluate.cpp
+++ b/src/evaluate.cpp
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos, int* complexity) {
   // We use the much less accurate but faster Classical eval when the NNUE
   // option is set to false. Otherwise we use the NNUE eval unless the
   // PSQ advantage is decisive and several pieces remain. (~3 Elo)
-  bool useClassical = !useNNUE || (pos.count<ALL_PIECES>() > 7 && abs(psq) > 1760);
+  bool useClassical = !useNNUE || (pos.count<ALL_PIECES>() > 7 && abs(psq) > 1781);
 
   if (useClassical)
       v = Evaluation<NO_TRACE>(pos).value();
@@ -1071,8 +1071,8 @@ Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos, int* complexity) {
       Value nnue = NNUE::evaluate(pos, true, &nnueComplexity);
 
       // Blend nnue complexity with (semi)classical complexity
-      nnueComplexity = (  412 * nnueComplexity
-                        + 428 * abs(psq - nnue)
+      nnueComplexity = (  406 * nnueComplexity
+                        + 424 * abs(psq - nnue)
                         + (optimism  > 0 ? int(optimism) * int(psq - nnue) : 0)
                         ) / 1024;
 
@@ -1080,12 +1080,12 @@ Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos, int* complexity) {
       if (complexity)
           *complexity = nnueComplexity;
 
-      optimism = optimism * (278 + nnueComplexity) / 256;
-      v = (nnue * scale + optimism * (scale - 755)) / 1024;
+      optimism = optimism * (272 + nnueComplexity) / 256;
+      v = (nnue * scale + optimism * (scale - 748)) / 1024;
   }
 
   // Damp down the evaluation linearly when shuffling
-  v = v * (197 - pos.rule50_count()) / 214;
+  v = v * (200 - pos.rule50_count()) / 214;
 
   // Guarantee evaluation does not hit the tablebase range
   v = std::clamp(v, VALUE_TB_LOSS_IN_MAX_PLY + 1, VALUE_TB_WIN_IN_MAX_PLY - 1);