// we want to keep the same order for all the moves but the new
// PV that goes to the front. Note that in case of MultiPV search
// the already searched PV lines are preserved.
- sort<RootMove>(RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx, RootMoves.end());
+ std::stable_sort(RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx, RootMoves.end());
// Write PV back to transposition table in case the relevant
// entries have been overwritten during the search.
}
// Sort the PV lines searched so far and update the GUI
- sort<RootMove>(RootMoves.begin(), RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx + 1);
+ std::stable_sort(RootMoves.begin(), RootMoves.begin() + PVIdx + 1);
if (PVIdx + 1 == PVSize || Time::now() - SearchTime > 3000)
sync_cout << uci_pv(pos, depth, alpha, beta) << sync_endl;
else if (tte)
{
// Never assume anything on values stored in TT
- if ( (ss->staticEval = eval = tte->static_value()) == VALUE_NONE
- ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->static_value_margin()) == VALUE_NONE)
+ if ( (ss->staticEval = eval = tte->eval_value()) == VALUE_NONE
+ ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->eval_margin()) == VALUE_NONE)
eval = ss->staticEval = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin);
// Can ttValue be used as a better position evaluation?
if (tte)
{
// Never assume anything on values stored in TT
- if ( (ss->staticEval = bestValue = tte->static_value()) == VALUE_NONE
- ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->static_value_margin()) == VALUE_NONE)
+ if ( (ss->staticEval = bestValue = tte->eval_value()) == VALUE_NONE
+ ||(ss->evalMargin = tte->eval_margin()) == VALUE_NONE)
ss->staticEval = bestValue = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin);
}
else