We simplify away the complicated rule in LMR for "non-checking captures
likely to be bad", as it seems not to bring any strength anymore.
STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 55256 W: 4972 L: 4897 D: 45387
Ptnml(0-2): 177, 3976, 19234, 4077, 164
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/
609adf3b3a33eb67a844f842
LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 10344 W: 437 L: 353 D: 9554
Ptnml(0-2): 1, 322, 4449, 392, 8
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/
609b3dfa3a33eb67a844f88e
--
While at it, we also update the Elo estimate of the previous rule in LMR
(see https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/
609af2a63a33eb67a844f867).
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3460
Bench:
3840688
&& thisThread->bestMoveChanges <= 2)
r++;
- // Decrease reduction if opponent's move count is high (~5 Elo)
+ // Decrease reduction if opponent's move count is high (~1 Elo)
if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 13)
r--;
if (singularQuietLMR)
r--;
- if (captureOrPromotion)
- {
- // Increase reduction for non-checking captures likely to be bad
- if ( !givesCheck
- && ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] + 210 * depth <= alpha)
- r++;
- }
- else
+ if (!captureOrPromotion)
{
// Increase reduction if ttMove is a capture (~3 Elo)
if (ttCapture)