Simplify away two extra conditions in countermoves based pruning.
These conditions (both of them) were introduced quite a long time ago
via speculative LTCs and seem to no longer bring any benefit.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/
609e81f35085663412d08f31
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 28488 W: 2487 L: 2382 D: 23619
Ptnml(0-2): 87, 1919, 10123, 2032, 83
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/
609e9c085085663412d08f59
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 33176 W: 1219 L: 1155 D: 30802
Ptnml(0-2): 13, 1036, 14423, 1106, 10
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3468
Bench:
4749514
else
{
// Countermoves based pruning (~20 Elo)
else
{
// Countermoves based pruning (~20 Elo)
- if ( lmrDepth < 4 + ((ss-1)->statScore > 0 || (ss-1)->moveCount == 1)
&& (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] < CounterMovePruneThreshold
&& (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] < CounterMovePruneThreshold)
continue;
&& (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] < CounterMovePruneThreshold
&& (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] < CounterMovePruneThreshold)
continue;