Do not decrease reduction at pv-nodes which are likely to fail low.
The idea of this patch can be described as following: during the search, if a node
on the principal variation was re-searched in non-pv search and this re-search got
a value which was much lower than alpha, then we can assume that this pv-node is
likely to fail low again, and we can reduce more aggressively at this node.
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/
6023a5fa7f517a561bc49638
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 70288 W: 6443 L: 6223 D: 57622
Ptnml(0-2): 239, 5022, 24436, 5174, 273
Passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/
6023f2617f517a561bc49661
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 105656 W: 4048 L: 3748 D: 97860
Ptnml(0-2): 67, 3312, 45761, 3630, 58
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3349
Bench:
3766422
movedPiece = pos.moved_piece(move);
givesCheck = pos.gives_check(move);
+ // Indicate PvNodes that will probably fail low if node was searched with non-PV search
+ // at depth equal or greater to current depth and result of this search was far below alpha
+ bool likelyFailLow = PvNode
+ && ttMove
+ && (tte->bound() & BOUND_UPPER)
+ && ttValue < alpha + 200 + 100 * depth
+ && tte->depth() >= depth;
+
// Calculate new depth for this move
newDepth = depth - 1;
if (th.marked())
r++;
- // Decrease reduction if position is or has been on the PV (~10 Elo)
- if (ss->ttPv)
+ // Decrease reduction if position is or has been on the PV
+ // and node is not likely to fail low (~10 Elo)
+ if (ss->ttPv && !likelyFailLow)
r -= 2;
// Increase reduction at root and non-PV nodes when the best move does not change frequently